Just Decision was Highly Unlikely from Radical Feminist, Pro-homosexual Activist Judge
OTTAWA, Dec 7, 2000 (LSN.ca) – This morning the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to appeal to The Challenge Team, an abstinence-only educational group. The Challenge Team was refused charitable status by Revenue Canada since they refused to promote alternatives to chastity such as condoms and the abortifacient morning-after pill. Unbelievably, the denial of appeal included forcing the very low budget group to pay Revenue Canada court costs.
Harold Visser, the leader of the Challenge Team, who represented the group before the Federal Court of Appeal in March, told LifeSite that he was “disappointed” by the ruling but not surprised especially since he had heard that Supreme Court Justice Clair L’Heureux-Dube was one of the three Justices considering allowing the appeal.
Given that the court’s most prominent radical feminist and pro-homosexual activist judge was sitting in on the decision, the possibility of an objective legal decision was remote. L’Heureux-Dubé spoke at a homosexual conference in favour of legal recognition of homosexuals living together. “In failing to recognize and support partnerships, traditional and otherwise, are we not doing violence to the fabric of our community?” asked L’Heureux-Dube in her keynote talk given October 20 last year.
For the evidence of bias on Justice Dubé see: https://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/1999/nov/991011.html#2 https://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/1999/april/990409b.html https://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2000/nov/001113.html#1