News
Featured Image
Andrew Cuomo, governor of New York.Scott Heins / Getty Images

NEW YORK, November 26, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – In a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court has ruled against New York Governor’s restrictions on places of worship, blocking the governor from enforcing the limits against religious buildings and places of worship. Newly appointed Justice Amy Coney Barrett is said to have cast the pivotal vote that made this case depart from previous cases.

In October, Governor Andrew Cuomo issued restrictions that severely affected places of worship, limiting the capacity to sometimes as little as ten people, no matter the size of the building. Cuomo decreed that places of religious worship would be fined $15,000 if they acted in violation of the new rules. 

Then, on November 9, the Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn filed an emergency application with the Supreme Court, fighting Cuomo’s order to limit the number of people present in houses of worship.

Two Orthodox Jewish synagogues and their parent organization also filed suit for the same reason.

The Diocese of Brooklyn stated in its papers that churches in the diocese, “have operated safely for months now, strictly adhering to existing government guidelines and unquestionably protecting their parishioners from any spread of COVID-19.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: No to mandatory vaccination for the coronavirus
  Show Petition Text
1077156 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 1100000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

People of goodwill can disagree about the safety, efficacy and religious implications of a new vaccine for the coronavirus.

But, everyone should agree on this point:

No government can force anyone who has reached legal adulthood to be vaccinated for the coronavirus. Equally, no government can vaccinate minors for the coronavirus against the will of their parents or guardians.

Please SIGN this urgent petition which urges policymakers at every level of government to reject calls for mandatory coronavirus vaccination.

Fear of a disease - which we know very little about, relative to other similar diseases - must not lead to knee-jerk reactions regarding public health, nor can it justify supporting the hidden agenda of governmental as well as non-governmental bodies that have apparent conflicts of interest in plans to restrict personal freedoms. 

The so-called "public health experts" have gotten it wrong many times during the current crisis. We should not, therefore, allow their opinions to rush decision-makers into policies regarding vaccination.

And, while some people, like Bill Gates, may have a lot of money, his opinion and that of his NGO (the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) - namely, that life will not return to normal till people are widely vaccinated - should not be permitted to influence policy decisions on a coronavirus vaccination program.

Finally, we must also not allow the rush by pharmaceutical companies to produce a new coronavirus vaccine to, itself, become an imperative for vaccination.

Unwitting citizens must not be used as guinea pigs for New World Order ideologues, or Big Pharma, in pursuit of a vaccine (and, profits) which may not even protect against future mutated strains of the coronavirus.

And it goes without saying that the production of vaccines using aborted babies for cell replication is a total non-starter, as the technique is gravely immoral.

However, if after sufficient study of the issue, a person who has reached the age of majority wishes to be vaccinated with a morally produced vaccine, along with his children, that is his business.

But we cannot and will not permit the government to make that decision for us.

Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition, urging policymakers at all levels of government to reject mandatory coronavirus vaccination.

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Bill Gates: Life won’t go back to ‘normal’ until population 'widely vaccinated' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bill-gates-life-wont-go-back-to-normal-until-population-widely-vaccinated

COVID-19 scare leads to more digital surveillance, talk of mandatory vaccine 'tattoos' for kids' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-19-scare-leads-to-more-digital-surveillance-talk-of-mandatory-vaccine-tattoos-for-kids

Trudeau says no return to ‘normal’ without vaccine: 'Could take 12 to 18 months' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-says-no-return-to-normal-without-vaccine-could-take-12-to-18-months

Trudeau mulls making coronavirus vaccine mandatory for Canadians - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-mulls-making-coronavirus-vaccine-mandatory-for-canadians

US bishop vows to ‘refuse’ COVID-19 vaccine if made from ‘aborted fetal tissue' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-bishop-vows-to-refuse-covid-19-vaccine-if-made-from-aborted-fetal-tissue

** While LifeSite opposes immorally-produced vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines, we do not have a position on any particular coronavirus vaccines produced without such moral problems. We realize many have general concerns about vaccines, but also recognize that millions of lives have been saved due to vaccines.

*** Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

It added, “the Governor’s new restrictions go way too far, infringe way too much, and have no legitimate basis, as applied to the Diocese’s churches,” noting that Cuomo himself had admitted that his laws would impact places of worship most.

The diocese mentioned that other “essential businesses can remain open without any capacity limitations whatsoever, and in the orange zones, even most non-essential businesses can remain open without any capacity limitation.” The term “essential business” is “a broad category that includes everything from grocery stores to pet shops to accounting and payroll offices.”

Such “express targeting of religious practice for unwarranted, disparate treatment – including the very ‘physical acts that constitute the free exercise of religion’,” constitutes a violation of the First Amendment, the Diocese of Brooklyn said.

However, in a ruling late last night, the Supreme Court blocked Cuomo’s limits of places of worship, stating that “the regulations cannot be viewed as neutral because they single out houses of worship for especially harsh treatment.”

Cuomo’s laws were described as: “far more restrictive than any COVID–related regulations that have previously come before the Court, much tighter than those adopted by many other jurisdictions hard-hit by the pandemic, and far more severe than has been shown to be required to prevent the spread of the virus at the applicants’ services.”

The ruling added that by violating the First Amendment rights, “There can be no question that the challenged restrictions, if enforced, will cause irreparable harm.”

“Even in a pandemic, the Constitution cannot be put away and forgotten,” wrote the Supreme Court. “The restrictions at issue here, by effectively barring many from attending religious services, strike at the very heart of the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious liberty.”

After the lawsuits were filed, Gov. Cuomo did in fact change the classification of the areas, so that churches and synagogues affected in the lawsuit could hold up to 50% of the maximum numbers. This moved Chief Justice Roberts to dissent and say that there was “simply no need” to grant injunctive relief at the current time. 

However, the majority ruled that “There is no justification for that proposed course of action. It is clear that this matter is not moot.”

The court ruled 5-4 in the matter, with Chief Justice Roberts, Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan dissenting.

Justice Sotomayor even suggested that the ruling in favour of the Diocese of Brooklyn, “will only exacerbate the nation’s suffering.”

RELATED

Religious New Yorkers take fight against New York Gov. Cuomo to Supreme Court

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.