News
Featured Image
Clouds are seen above The US Supreme Court building on May 17, 2021 in Washington, DC.Drew Angerer / Staff / Getty

LifeSiteNews is on the cutting edge of life and family news reporting. Support our Summer Campaign by giving a gift of support today: give.lifesitenews.com 

WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews) – The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 Thursday that the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) does not have broad authority to regulate carbon emissions from power plants.

This was a major blow to the federal government’s longstanding tradition of policymaking by unelected bureaucrats.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion in West Virginia v. EPA, which concerned the Biden administration’s efforts to force energy production away from coal and toward so-called “green” alternatives such as solar and wind under the powers delegated to the EPA by  the Clean Air Act, and how much of its own authority Congress can transfer elsewhere. 

“Capping carbon dioxide emissions at a level that will force a nationwide transition away from the use of coal to generate electricity may be a sensible ‘solution to the crisis of the day,’” Roberts wrote. “But it is not plausible that Congress gave EPA the authority to adopt on its own such a regulatory scheme […] A decision of such magnitude and consequence rests with Congress itself, or an agency acting pursuant to a clear delegation from that representative body.”

The ruling has drastic ramifications for environmental policy, for the federal government’s ability to impact the economy, and potentially for other policy areas in which Congress has delegated the responsibility for crafting policy to unelected agencies, which conservatives have long decried as a major contributor to the growth in the size and power of the federal government, its infringement on individual rights, and the relative inability of the people to change policies they disfavor.

— Article continues below Petition —
Petition
  Show Petition Text
1 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 2500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
  Hide Petition Text

The ruling has been met with outrage from Democrats and liberal activists, who have long claimed the federal government needs broad discretion to combat anthropogenic global warming, the phenomenon in which they claim human activity, rather than natural phenomena, is primarily responsible for Earth’s changing climate.

The ruling comes at the close of a Supreme Court session delivering several momentous conservative victories, most notably the long-awaited overturn of Roe v. Wade, which forced all fifty states to allow most abortions, and an affirmation of the Second Amendment right to bear arms.

Leftists have responded with anger, violence, and calls to defy or limit the Supreme Court.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

3 Comments

    Loading...