News
Featured Image
Clouds are seen above The US Supreme Court building on May 17, 2021 in Washington, DC.Drew Angerer / Staff / Getty

WASHINGTON (LifeSiteNews) — Left-wing U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer declined Tuesday to intervene on behalf of Maine healthcare workers challenging the state’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate, delaying a final decision on whether the nation’s highest court will consider the matter until the end of the month.

Represented by Liberty Counsel (LC), more than 2,000 healthcare workers contend that the state mandate that they be vaccinated violates the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious freedom, as well as the federal government’s obligation to honor religious exemptions and accommodations under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

“All Plaintiffs seek in this lawsuit is to be able to continue to provide the health care they have provided to patients for their entire careers, and to do so under the same protective measures that have sufficed for them to be considered superheroes for the last 18 months,” they argue.

Judge Jon Levy of the Federal District Court in Maine sided with the Maine government last week, prompting an appeal to the Supreme Court. But the New York Times reports that Breyer denied their request, at least until either lower court weighs in or the enforcement deadline kicks in.

“Justice Breyer did not ask for a response to the workers’ application or refer it to the full Supreme Court,” the Times reports. “He said the workers could return to the Supreme Court after the federal appeals court rules on their appeal or if that court does not issue a decision by Oct. 29.”

Liberty Counsel signaled they were in good spirits about the decision in a Tuesday press release.

“We are pleased that the Supreme Court is ready to consider this case if we do not get relief at the First Circuit Court of Appeals or if the lower court does not rule by October 29,” LC founder and chairman Mat Staver said. “As of Monday, our case is now fully briefed at the court of appeals. We look forward to an expedited ruling. There is no question that Gov. Janet Mills cannot nullify federal law and the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.” 

Across the nation, significant concerns remain about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine, stemming largely from the fact that they were developed and released far faster than any previous vaccine.

Vaccine defenders note that the one-year development period was not starting from scratch, but rather relied on years of prior research into mRNA technology; and that one of the innovations of the Trump administration’s “Operation Warp Speed” was conducting various aspects of the development process concurrently rather than sequentially, eliminating delays unrelated to safety. However, those factors do not fully account for the condensing of clinical trial phases — each of which can take anywhere from 1–3 years on their own — to just three months apiece. 

While cases of severe harm reported to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) after taking COVID shots represent less than one percent of total doses administered in the United States, a 2010 report submitted to the US Department of Health & Human Services’ (HHS) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) warned that VAERS caught “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events.” May reporting from NBC News quotes several mainstream experts acknowledging “gaps” in federal vaccine monitoring.

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.