Featured Image
Transgender symbolShutterstock

STOCKHOLM, Sweden, May 6, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — Sweden’s Karolinska University Hospital will no longer prescribe puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to children under 16. In a recent statement, the hospital explained why children being treated for gender dysphoria in its affiliated Tema Barn – Astrid Lindgren Children’s Hospital will no longer be given these drugs.

“In December 2019, the SBU (Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services) published an overview of the knowledge base which showed a lack of evidence for both the long-term consequences of the treatments, and the reasons for the large influx of patients in recent years,” the new Karolinska University Hospital policy reads.

“These treatments are potentially fraught with extensive and irreversible adverse consequences such as cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, infertility, increased cancer risk, and thrombosis,” it continues. “This makes it challenging to assess the risk / benefit for the individual patient, and even more challenging for the minors and their guardians to be in a position of an informed stance regarding these treatments.”

The new policy referred to the December 2020 U.K. High Court decision in the Keira Bell case, in which the court ruled that it was “highly unlikely that a child aged 13 or under would be competent to give consent to the administration of puberty blockers” and that it was “doubtful” that children age 14 or 15 could properly understand and appreciate the seriousness of the process.

“For individuals between the age of 16 and 18, the [U.K.] court considers it advisable to request court approval before starting hormonal treatment, since the treatment should be considered experimental,” the Swedish policy related.

“As a result of this ruling, the NHS [National Health Service] put an end to initiating hormonal treatments in new cases of individuals under 16, while recommending a thorough review of ongoing, actively treated cases. For patients between ages 16 and 18, it is recommended that the treating physician receives court approval before cross-sex hormones are initiated.”

The consequences of the Keira Bell case were far-reaching: Thanks in part to the U.K. High Court’s ruling, the Swedish hospital has decided to stop giving “hormonal treatments” to children under 16, and to be very careful in administering them to children between 16 and 18.

“The patient must receive comprehensive information about potential risks of the treatment, and a careful assessment of the patient’s maturity level must be conducted to determine if the patient is capable of evaluating, and consenting to, the treatment,” the new policy states.

Children who are already receiving puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones will be assessed individually to determine whether the treatment should continue. This will depend on the children’s “degree of maturity and ability to consent” as well as their capacity to understand the uncertainty of long-term effects, the known long-term effects, and the “potential risks.”

The Society for Evidence Based Gender Medicine (SEGM), which published the new policy in English, called its implementation “a watershed moment.”

“Sweden is the first country whose renowned hospital has explicitly stopped following the Dutch protocol, which allows for administration of puberty blockers at age 12 (and increasingly, as young as 8–9, at the early stage of puberty known as Tanner 2), and cross-sex hormones at the age of 16,” SEGM stated. “It also is the first country to officially deviate from WPATH [the World Professional Association for Transgender Health] guidance.”

Among other things, the WPATH advises that some children might be “eligible” for puberty-suppressing hormones from the age of nine.

According to SEGM, Finland has also recently changed its policies about treating gender dysphoria, prioritizing “psychological interventions and support rather than medical interventions, particularly for youth with no childhood history of gender dysphoria.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Biological males don't belong in girls' sports - #IStandWithSelina
  Show Petition Text
415472 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 450000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

UPDATE (1/29/21) - On day one of the new administration, Biden signed an Executive Order dismantling girls sports, and allowing biological boys back into girls locker-rooms.

The order declares: "Children should be able to learn without worrying about whether they will be denied access to the rest room, the locker room, or school sports. . . . All persons should receive equal treatment under the law, no matter their gender identity or sexual orientation."

This affront to reason effectively signals an end to girls' and women's sports, and diminishes their effort to compete on a level playing field.

Though this petition has already been delivered once, we will deliver new signatures to the US Dept of Education when restrictions permit, in honor of Selina Soule, who filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) in 2019.

UPDATE (5/29/20) - US Dep’t of Education: Letting males compete in girls’ sports violates female athletes’ civil rights

UPDATE (2/13/20) - Selina Soule and two other Connecticut high school girl track athletes, Alanna Smith and Chelsea Mitchell, have sued the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC) to stop boys who claim to be girls from competing in their sport.

Soule is the same high school girl who, last year, filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR). That complaint is still ongoing, as the OCR has not yet handed down its guidance ruling.

This also explains why this petition is still ongoing. Please SIGN and SHARE.

But, with another track season soon coming to an end, the girls' attorneys have asked the Court for an injunction that would stop the CIAC from implementing its current policy while the lawsuit proceeds.

Soule, Smith, and Mitchell will soon run in regional and state meets, competing for state championships. This year, they would like to have the opportunity to win, fair and square.

Please learn more about the latest news concerning this case, here:

Then, please SIGN this petition. Thank you!


Selina Soule is a female athlete who now must compete against biological males because of Connecticut's policy requiring that boys who identify as girls be admitted into girls' sports competitions.

But, when boys compete in girls' sports, they win because they have a natural advantage. It's scientifically proven, and it's also common sense.

This crushes the motivation of the biological girls who have worked hard to compete on a level playing field, only to enter into competitions which they can never win, despite all of their efforts.

It also puts girls into harm's way in contact sports, AND it deprives female athletes of their right to fairly compete for college scholarships and other accolades.

This is wrong! And, that's why this URGENT petition supports Selina and all the other female athletes out there, who have put in the hours on the track or on the court.

Please SIGN this common sense petition supporting Selina Soule's complaint to the Dept of Education's Office for Civil Rights, against Connecticut's discriminatory policy.


*Above photo credit: Michael Goodin / The Daily Signal

  Hide Petition Text

Dr. Michelle Cretella of the American College of Pediatricians told LifeSiteNews that the ideological Dutch Protocol is finally getting the criticism it deserves.

“The indiscriminate use of the Dutch Protocol, consisting of pubertal suppression and cross-sex hormone use in minors with gender identity issues, is finally receiving warranted critical scrutiny and media coverage in Europe,” she said via email.

Noting that the U.K. and the Swedish hospital have put on the breaks, Cretella stated that Finland, too, has begun to restrict hormonal treatment of minors.

“In addition to these entities concluding that risk outweighs any alleged benefit, Finland also restricted its use of blockers and cross-sex hormones in minors based on risk of harm from these interventions and the lack of scientific evidence for their safety and efficacy,” she said. “Finland also outright rejects surgery for minors with gender dysphoria.”

Cretella added that the American College of Pediatricians has argued since 2016 that “science and sound medical ethics” demand that the U.S., too, should stop the “uncritical use of blockers and cross-sex hormones in these emotionally vulnerable and often traumatized youth.”