News
Featured Image
 Tom Williams-Pool/Getty Images

WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews) – Intense outrage has erupted today condemning the illicit publication of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s majority draft opinion in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization case, and several prominent pro-life U.S. congressmen have added their voices to the din. 

“Leaking a draft opinion by the Supreme Court is unprecedented and reprehensible,” said Senator Steve Daines (R-MT), founder and chair of the Senate Pro-Life Caucus, in a press release. “There should be an immediate investigation into who is responsible as it is a clear attempt to intimidate the Court.” 

— Article continues below Petition —
Supreme Court: Publish decision to overturn Roe now!
  Show Petition Text
16643 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 17500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

SIGN this petition urging the Chief Justice and all the Associate Justices to PUBLISH the decision to overturn Roe now!

Don't allow pro-abortion leftists to pressure Supreme Court justices to change their vote to overturn Roe!

According to an initial leaked draft majority opinion allegedly written by Justice Samuel Alito and obtained by Politico, the U.S. Supreme Court has voted to overturn its nearly 50-year-old Roe v. Wade decision, which imposed abortion on demand across the country.

As reported by Politico, the opinion is “a full-throated, unflinching repudiation of the 1973 decision."

Of course, if this decision holds, this would be the best news in decades, thanks be to God!

However, leftists in Washington and in the media will stop at nothing to prevent Roe from being overturned.

But, intimidation and threats cannot be permitted to influence the Court, especially on this most fundamental human rights ruling.

That's why - right now - it's essential to urge the High Court to PUBLISH the ruling which overturns Roe.

SIGN this petition urging the Chief Justice and all the Associate Justices to PUBLISH the decision to overturn Roe now!

The leak of a drafted opinion is unprecedented in Supreme Court history and is sending shockwaves through the legal world.

Rumors are swirling about who could've leaked this seminal ruling, and what Chief Justice Roberts and the FBI will do about it.

But, this is a distraction from the real news which is that the Supreme Court is on the verge of righting one of the worst legal decisions ever made in the United States.

Over 60 million babies have been killed in the U.S. since the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling, a colossal evil that has been allowed to stand for too long.

That's why we need to tell the Members of the U.S. Supreme Court to stand strong and PUBLISH THE RULING NOW!

Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this urgent petition.

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'Is the leaked Roe v. Wade reversal opinion an attempt by the Left to pressure justices?' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/analysis-is-the-leaked-roe-reversal-opinion-an-attempt-by-the-left-to-pressure-justices

'Alleged leaked majority opinion shows Supreme Court will overturn Roe v. Wade' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-scotus-roe-leaked

'Pro-abortion protesters gather outside Supreme Court after reported ruling overturning Roe v. Wade' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pro-abortion-demonstrators-gather-outside-supreme-court-after-reported-ruling-overturning-roe-v-wade/

**Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

Despite a clear betrayal of institutional confidence with the leak, Daines’ acknowledged that Alito’s opinion, if allowed to stand, will right “an historic injustice” by the court, in addition to returning “the power to the American people and their elected officials to enact laws to protect unborn children and mothers.” 

Daines is joined by Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), who took to Twitter and Fox News to express similar sentiments: “In over two centuries in our nation’s history, this has never happened, and this is as corrosive and destructive to the Supreme Court as we have ever seen.” 

Cruz alleges that this tactic was orchestrated by the left in order to pressure the justices into protecting Roe. “Democrats have a lot to answer for,” he said. “The destruction that this wreaks in the court, because it will carry on potentially forever limiting the justices to do their solemn constitutional responsibility. It really is an outrage.”  

RELATED: Conservatives react to leaked Supreme Court opinion on Roe with joy, apprehension

U.S. Representative Chris Smith (R-NJ) also asserted in a formal statement that “the leak of Justice Alito’s February draft opinion on Dobbs is an egregious abuse of process and trust.”   

Like Daines, Smith contends that the document’s release bodes well for the unborn. “The U.S. Supreme Court seems poised to take a powerful step towards empowering elected representatives to protect the weakest and most vulnerable,” he said. “We are at the tipping point.

He concluded: “I join millions of Americans who are hopeful that government sanctioned violence against babies and the exploitation of women by abortion is nearing an end—although in a very real way, the struggle to defend children in the womb and offer tangible assistance to their mothers now enters a critically important new phase.” 

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

3 Comments

    Loading...