News
Featured Image
 Matthew Cavanaugh / Getty Images

BEXAR COUNTY, Texas, October 28, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Texas law enforcement will be looking into recent revelations from Project Veritas regarding a “ballot chasing” operation to essentially buy votes for Democrat candidates through various material rewards.

The conservative watchdog group’s undercover investigation followed Raquel Rodriguez, who “nominally” worked as a political consultant for Republican House candidate Mauro Garza but in practice was working to shift votes toward Democrats, via what Veritas chief James O’Keefe calls a “a mix of gifts and coercion to work down their list of targeted voters,” in violation of “both federal and state law.”

“Yeah, I'm getting the Biden vote out, but I mean I'm not going to do it for free – in other words, if they don’t pay me, I’m like excuse me?” Rodriguez told an undercover journalist. “I'm against Trump. OK. I'm with Biden and I’m with (MJ) Hegar. That's the truth. I've got three Democrats; three Republicans and the rest are Democrats.”

“My people are undercover because some of them are Republicans,” she added. “Some of them are Democrats. Some of them are just wanting to get the right people in office, so some of the Republicans are precinct chairs that cannot be known because they could get kicked out, but they want to help Biden – and so that's how they're helping me.”

“I can honestly say I'm bringing at least at least 7,000 votes to the polls,” Rodriguez boasted. For example, “if y’all are my seniors, I’m literally picking you up. I’m going to your house, you’re doing your ballot. I go throughout the entire city. If I have a bunch of them, what I do if I have a bunch of them, I'll take 20 (ballots) here, 30 (ballots) here, 40 (ballots) here.”

Project Veritas filmed one such encounter, in which Rodriguez told a woman, “you can vote for whoever you want, but our conversation that we had, you said you were voting for Hegar, ‘cause you were going straight Democrat. You said you're voting straight Democrat per our conversation, so that when you're voting for the straight Dem — ‘cause that's what you want to do, correct?”

She then coached the woman to cross out the line for Republican incumbent Sen. John Cornyn and place her initials next to it to denote an “accident,” then vote for his Democrat challenger, Hegar. Rodriguez then rewarded the woman with a new shawl.

The shawl is just one example of the rewards these ballot chasers use to induce the desired vote. Others include, by Rodriguez’s own admission, rosaries, diabetic socks, wallets, and even free meals.

“This coming Thursday at a bar, we’re going to feed 45 ex-felons that we registered because they’re going to all vote,” she explained. “I got some people to go to the bar and guess what? I had to f***ing take them beer. I was like, are y’all going to come and vote or not? And they were like we’re going to meet you right now. I said come meet me because when you get to the bar, I’m going to have a bucket of beer for all of y’all to drink.”

At one point, Rodriguez admits that “what I do, picking up those ballots when he was with me, that’s illegal. I could go to jail. I’m a little apprehensive to tell anybody what I’m f***ing doing, you know what I’m saying?”

All of this violates a variety of both state and federal laws, according to Project Veritas Chief Legal Officer Jered Ede.

“Rodriguez may qualify for a sentence enhancement under Texas Election Code §276.012, which increases the penalty for ballot harvesting if three or more people are involved,” he says. “Rodriguez boasts of having over a dozen ballot harvesters on her payroll – thus pushing these misdemeanors into state felonies, punishable by up to two years (…) Rodriguez is prohibited by Texas law to assist voters unless the voter does not read the language the ballot is written in or is otherwise unable to fill out the ballot on their own.”

The gifts, whether for votes themselves or even just for voter registration, “would be a violation of Texas Election Code §276.010 and federal law – 52 USC §10307(c) and 18 USC §597, which bar buying ballots or other voting material,” Ede explained. “If convicted, Rodriguez faces up to two years in prison for violating state law, and up to five years for violating federal law.”

Garza responded to the revelations by condemning his former employee’s alleged activities and declaring that he “welcome(s) any investigation and accountability to expose these outlandish allegations.”

At one point, Rodriguez names Renee Yanta, a Republican judicial candidate running for Texas’s Fourth District Court of Appeals, as “in my pocket” because she and Garza paid her “$3,500 to make sure that their name is on the ballot.” Yanta told Project Veritas that she only hired Rodriguez for routine campaign tasks such as running information tables at public events, and that she did not hire “Raquel Rodriguez or anyone else to chase ballots or for ballot harvesting.”

“What’s shown in the video is shocking and should alarm all Texans who care about election integrity,” Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in response to the undercover investigation. “We are aggressively investigating the serious allegations and potential crimes that Project Veritas’s documentary audio and video recordings shed light on today.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Urge the RCMP to launch independent investigation into the WE Charity contract deal
  Show Petition Text
6897 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 7500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Please SIGN this petition which asks the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) to launch an investigation into the controversial WE Charity contract deal.

Canadians deserve a corruption-free government, but allegations of impropriety are hanging over matters related to the WE Charity contract deal with the current government.

And, only the RCMP is positioned to launch an independent inquiry into the issues of whether or not any laws were broken, and or possible abuse of political office for personal or family gain.

Indeed, the WE Charity was criticized in June 2020 when the Canadian government selected the charity to administer the Canada Student Service Grant program, a $900 million program which would help students experiencing financial difficulties due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Of particular concern are revelations that WE Charity paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to members of the Trudeau family for past speaking engagements, and that the charity paid for Finance Minister Bill Morneau’s vacation (Morneau later repaid them).

These revelations obviously raise serious questions:

  • What is the connection between WE Charity and high-ranking government officials?
  • What, if anything, did either party stand to gain from this contract?
  • Why and how was the $43.53 M contract awarded to WE Charity without going through a competitive bidding process?
  • And, was the Lobbying Act violated?

The main concern is that the charity has deep connections with the Trudeau Family and other important government officials, and that serious conflicts of interests may have existed between members of government and the charity...and that laws may have been broken.

Although an investigation into the connection between the federal government and WE Charity was launched, questions have not been answered. Instead, more questions have been brought up.

Since the story broke, the Liberals have repeatedly delayed voting on the release of WE Charity documents.

And, just recently, a motion, which was sponsored by the Conservatives in the House of Commons and which called for an investigation into the relationships between WE Charity and the government and Ministers of the Crown and their families, was defeated.

But, the fact that the government and its political allies seem to be trying to bury this issue politically should not distract the attention of law enforcement who have a duty to ensure that government officials are held to account for serious breaches of conflict of interest.

No government leader or official should behave as though they are above the law.

Please SIGN this petition which calls on the RCMP to launch an independent investigation into the WE Charity controversy.

Then, please SHARE with your like-minded family, friends and relations.

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'Politician accuses Trudeau of redacting ‘damning information’ in released docs on WE Charity scandal'

'Conservative MP grills Trudeau on family’s enrichment in WE Charity scandal'

'Scandal-plagued WE Charity shuts down Canadian operations, will leave ‘endowment’'

Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

Ample evidence suggests that concerns about election integrity are very real, from former New York City elections commissioner Alan Schulkin (a Democrat) admitting in 2016 that vote fraud is widespread to a New Jersey judge vacating the results of a city council election over charges of election fraud last month.

In September, the New York Post published an interview with a former Democrat “fixer” who has helped manipulate mail-in ballots on a “grand scale” for “decades” in New Jersey. “An election that is swayed by 500 votes, 1,000 votes … could be enough to flip states,” he said. “This is a real thing. And there is going to be a f—— war coming November 3rd over this stuff.”

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.