News

AUSTIN, January 13, 2003 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The Texas Supreme Court ruled on Dec. 31 that Texas Medicaid restrictions on funding for “medically necessary” abortions for poor women don’t violate the state constitution.

The 8-0 decision in Bell v. Low Income Women of Texas, et al. reverses a 3rd Court of Appeals ruling in December 2000 that the denial of funding for a poor woman to have an abortion when her health—but not necessarily her life—might be threatened by a pregnancy, violates the Texas Equal Rights Amendment.  The court has thus ruled constitutional a law that prefers childbearing over abortion. “The people of Texas never put the right to abortion funding in their constitution,” says Christopher Maska, an Austin attorney who helped write an amicus brief filed on behalf of 66 members of the state Legislature.  For newswire coverage see:  https://biz.yahoo.com/law/030106/0d89626676be29b8ee2250380f793aa8_1.html   For related coverage see:  NO FORCED PAYMENTS FOR ABORTION ON DEMAND IN TEXAS https://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/1998/mar/98032505.html

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.