News
Featured Image
 Sahara Prince/Shutterstock

(LifeSiteNews) – On September 7, a federal judge in Texas ruled that a Christian business was exempt from the government mandate to cover certain HIV-preventive drugs for employees. 

Braidwood Management Inc., which is owned by Steven Hotze and oversees Hotze Health and Wellness Center, took legal action in 2020 against a part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) which requires coverage for contraceptives and PrEP drugs. Judge Reed O’Connor ruled in agreement with Hotze, stating that this provision violates the religious freedom of the Christian company. 

According to the court order, Braidwood brought up several complaints about the ACA mandates, including denying Braidwood “of the ability to choose whether and to what extent its insurance plan covers preventive care” and forcing the company “to underwrite coverage for services to which it holds sincere religious objections.” 

“Hotze wants Braidwood’s plan to exclude or limit coverage for the preventive care services,” the report states. “But Braidwood cannot exclude coverage for those services without violating the law.” 

“Because Braidwood self-insures, Hotze believes that offering coverage is itself a tacit endorsement of the behaviors that he believes the services encourage,” it adds. 

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Supreme Court must defend religious liberty of Christians who refused to bake gay-wedding cake
  Show Petition Text
4114 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 5000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

SIGN: The Supreme Court must hear the appeal of Aaron and Melissa Klein as they seek to vindicate their right to decline baking cakes that violate their religious beliefs.

Oregon bakers Aaron and Melissa Klein have been through hell since 2013 when they were sued for refusing to bake a gay-wedding cake that violated their religious beliefs as Christians.

They hope the Supreme Court will hear their appeal against a ruling that ultimately put Sweet Cakes by Melissa out of business and resulted in a state-imposed fine of $135,000.

This persecution of Christians by liberal judges must be corrected by the Supreme Court.

SIGN: I stand with Aaron and Melissa Klein in their fight for justice.

Melissa was forced to bake from home with her husband and five children in September 2013 when a sustained hate campaign dried up business at the store and eventually forced them to fold in 2016.

The Kleins have been embroiled in a never-ending struggle since to uphold the right of all Christians to decline participating in events and messages that violate their faith.

It's time Christians and people of good-will brought this terrible injustice to light. 

SIGN: We demand the U.S. Supreme Court hear the appeal of Aaron and Melissa Klein.

First Liberty lawyers hope the Supreme Court will overturn an Oregon ruling that put the Kleins out of business.

A statement by First Liberty reads: Our attorneys argue that the Constitution protects the Kleins and all Americans from being forced to express a message with which they disagree. The brief states, “Forcing artists to design, create, and decorate custom products against their strongest beliefs abridges the freedom protected by the Free Speech Clause” of the First Amendment.

“Having to shut down the shop was devastating,” Melissa told First Liberty. “Watching something our family had worked so hard on for years to build just disappear in such a short time—it crushed me.”

Thankfully the $135,000 fine was reduced to $30,000 this July by the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, but the principle at play is much more valuable to the Kleins than money. 

SIGN: The Supreme Court MUST defend the Klein's First Amendment rights.

Please SHARE this petition after signing it, as this case deserves the urgent attention of every American.

Thank you.

  Hide Petition Text

Beyond the religious grounds of complaint, Hotze detailed the repercussions his company faces “for failing to comply with the mandates.” Braidwood must pay “$100 per day for each employee not covered in accordance with the ACA.” The combination of the complaints led the judge to rule that “requiring religious employers to choose between complying with a service coverage mandate and paying a penalty imposes a substantial burden on religious freedom, and an injury in fact.” 

O’Connor further stated that he found the “counterarguments … unpersuasive” because the ACA provision in question “requires Braidwood to cover services it does not wish to cover for both religious and non-religious reasons.” He dismissed the argument that the company “waived all claims of injury based on its religious objections” and declared that the “religious objections are legally protected interests.” 

The ruling has been met with backlash and criticism from those who promote pro-LGBT and anti-Christian views.  

“Today, a radical, Republican-appointed federal judge ruled that employers can deny coverage for PrEP: a drug proven to save lives from HIV/AIDS and a key strategy for ending the epidemic,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi posted on Twitter. “This disturbing decision amounts to open homophobia: unleashing unthinkable suffering and death specifically among the LGBTQ community.” 

READ: Nancy Pelosi calls abortion restrictions ‘sinful’ during ‘Women’s Equality Day’ event

The ACA has been challenged ever since its earliest days in effect. A year after the program was passed, 26 states joined together to fight the “unconstitutional” ruling. 

Last week’s decision was another victory for Christian organizations fighting the LGBT agenda. The ACA has sparked many lawsuits for religious freedom over the years, including the long-awaited victory of Dr. James Dobson, who won a case to refuse the requirement to insure abortion-inducing contraceptives through his nonprofit.  

RELATED:

Trump admin cuts Obamacare rule forcing abortion, sex-change coverage

‘HIV-phobia’: Gays shame people who refuse to sleep with HIV-positive partners

Why are the mainstream media and gov’t health agencies pushing a new AIDS scare?

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

7 Comments

    Loading...