OpinionTue Jun 19, 2012 - 3:14 pm EST
The cultural wars continue: a Catholic perspective
June 19, 2012 (HLIAmerica.org) - We are in the midst of a cultural war between modern secular proponents and Catholics who believe and accept the magisterial teachings of the church.
Many contemporary men and women have been formed through public schools and universities, through movies and television, through newspapers and magazines to accept as normal a whole set of conduct choices: abortion, mercy killing, in vitro fertilization, embryonic stem cell research, the homosexual lifestyle, same-sex “marriage,” use of contraceptives, premarital sex, and so on.
Each one of these actions is held as a part of the modern, contemporary world view, as a development and improvement of social mores.
The Catholic Church, on the other hand, believes that each one of these forms of conduct is sinful, offensive to God, contrary to true development of the person and harmful both to the individual and to society.
The battle rages. The media generally support the secular views.
It was interesting to see how President Barack Obama’s recent endorsement of same-sex “marriage” was viewed by The New York Times, which immediately produced editorials and op-ed pieces praising him for his stand.
Newsweek magazine carried a cover picture of the president with a rainbow halo over his head and the words: “The first gay president” (the title of an article by the Catholic writer Andrew Sullivan).
And so it was with innumerable other publications. A secular consensus was apparent. The voices of religious people — which were included in a few newspapers and magazines — were generally downplayed or ignored.
One of the great concerns for the church today is the number of Catholics who, for various reasons, accept the secular views in regard to at least some of the actions indicated. Numbers of Catholics resort to contraception and in vitro fertilization. Increasing numbers support “gay marriage.”
It seems Vice President Joe Biden, also a Catholic, precipitated President Obama’s announcement about “gay marriage” by declaring that he (Biden) had come to support it.
On May 10, Catholic Nancy Pelosi, U.S. House minority leader, announced that her faith compelled her to favor same-sex “marriage.” “My religion compels me,” she said, “to be against discrimination of any kind in our country, and I consider this (same-sex marriage) a form of discrimination.” She welcomed the president’s announcement.
The media carried reports of professors at Catholic universities who criticized the Church for opposing “gay marriage.” They argued that supporting traditional marriage is only one opinion among several found in Catholic circles.
According to LifeSiteNews, Daniel Maguire (a former priest) at Marquette University in Milwaukee, even opined that the bishops might be considered “in moral schism since most in the church have moved on to a more humane view on the rights of those whom God has made gay.” But the Catholic Church’s views are clear, definite and wise.
They are based upon the sacred Scriptures and constant theological teaching down through the centuries. “He who hears you, hears Me,” Our Lord said to his disciples: and these words apply to the official teachers of the Church. Change in manners or mores is not necessarily a step forward. What is the latest trend is not necessarily the wisest action.
Common sense itself is often a helpful judge as to the value of changes in conduct.
Recent scientific research has been cautioning people about the difficulties that occur with in vitro fertilization — the health problems of children born through the process, the immense challenge of what to do with the more than 400,000 frozen embryos (babies a few days old) in fertility clinics who will not be used by the parents/gamete providers.
In China, abortion and one-child per family law has now resulted in a situation in which millions of men will not be able to find brides, since so many girl babies have been aborted.
Acceptance of pre-marital sex — which Hollywood and TV programs have promoted for a long time in their productions — has brought about an epidemic of sexually transmitted diseases in our country.
And acceptance of same-sex “marriage” changes the very meaning of an institution upon which civilization has been built throughout the ages.
The cultural wars will continue. It would be a tragedy if Catholics in the United States sided with the wrong army.
CLICK ‘LIKE’ IF YOU ARE PRO-LIFE!
Father John A. Leies, SM, STD, is a Contributing Writer of HLI America. He is president emeritus of St. Mary’s University and formerly served as head of the Theology Department there. His recent writings may be found at HLI America’s Truth and Charity Forum. A version of this article originally appeared in Today’s Catholic, the newspaper of the Archdiocese of San Antonio.
‘Little miracles’: Mom gives birth to naturally-conceived quintuplets after refusing ‘selective reduction’
AUSTRALIA, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) -- A 26-year-old Australian mom has given birth to five healthy babies, all conceived naturally, after refusing the doctor’s advice that she must abort three of them in order to give the remaining two a better chance at life.
“After my initial ultrasound I was told I could consider the selection method to give 2 babies the best chance in life,” wrote mom Kim Tucci in a Facebook post last September.
“I watched a YouTube video on the procedure and I cried. I could never do that! Was I selfish for not giving two the chance of 100% survival? All I knew is that I already love them and that every heart beat I heard I connect with them more. For me life starts when a heart starts beating and all I know for sure is that I will do whatever it takes to bring them into this world healthy,” she wrote.
Last Thursday Kim and her husband Vaughn welcomed the five new members into their family — one boy and four girls —increasing the number of their children from 3 to 8. The babies were born at 30 weeks, 10 weeks early, due to insufficient space in Kim’s womb. They weighed on average about 2.5 pounds.
The quintuplets’ story began last March, after Kim and Vaughn had been trying for six months to conceive just one more child for their family. Due to health complications, Kim wondered if she would ever become a mother again.
After what she thought was an extra long cycle, she decided to take a pregnancy test.
“I was feeling tired and a little nauseated and thought I would take a pregnancy test just to get the ‘what if’ out of my head. To my shock and utter excitement it was positive,” she wrote on a Facebook post.
The parents got the shock of their lives when doctors confirmed in an ultrasound examination that there was not one baby, but five.
“After a long wait for the ultrasound we finally went in. The sonographer told me there were multiple gestational sacks, but she could only see a heart beat in two. I was so excited! Twins!”
“I was moved to another machine for a clearer view and had the head doctor come in and double check the findings. She started to count, one, two, three, four, five. Did i hear that correctly? Five? My legs start to shake uncontrollably and all i can do is laugh. The sonographer then told me the term for five is ‘quintuplets,’” Kim wrote.
Even though Kim began to feel stretched to the limit with all those human lives growing inside her, she chose to focus on her babies, and not herself, referring to them as “my five little miracles.”
“It's getting harder as each day passes to push through the pain, every part of my body aches and sleeping is becoming very painful. No amount of pillows are helping support my back and belly. Sometimes I get so upset that I just want to throw my hands up and give in.”
“Sometimes my pelvis becomes so stiff I can barely walk and my hips feel like they are grinding away constantly. I'm finding it hard to eat as I basically have no room left in my stomach, and the way it is positioned it's pushed all the way back with the babies leaning against it.”
“My skin on my belly is so stretched its painful and hot to touch. It literally feels like I have hives! No amount of cream helps relieve the discomfort. I have a lot of stretch marks now. Dealing with such a huge change in my body is hard.”
“Is it all worth it? Yes!!!! I will keep pushing through,” she wrote in one Facebook post days before the babies were born.
The newborns' names are Keith, Ali, Penelope, Tiffany, and Beatrix. They were born at King Edward Memorial Hospital in Subiaco, Western Australia. Mother and babies are reported to be doing well.
UN rights chief tells Catholic countries to legalize abortion over Zika virus: bishops and cardinal react
GENEVA, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) -- The United Nations, following the lead of international abortion activists, is now urging Latin American countries hit by the mosquito-borne Zika virus to lift restrictions on abortion for pregnant women who have contacted the virus and whose pre-born children may be at risk for birth defects, including having smaller than normal heads.
The UN human rights office said today that it is not enough for South American countries to urge women to postpone pregnancy without also offering them abortion as a final solution.
“How can they ask these women not to become pregnant, but not offer… the possibility to stop their pregnancies?” UN spokeswoman Cecile Pouilly told reporters.
UN human rights chief Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein said that governments should make available contraception and abortion services.
“Laws and policies that restrict (women’s) access to these services must be urgently reviewed in line with human rights obligations in order to ensure the right to health for all in practice,” he said.
But Brazil’s bishops strongly asserted yesterday that efforts should be made to eradicate the virus, not the people who may be infected by it.
The disease is “no justification whatsoever to promote abortion,” they said in a statement, adding that it is not morally acceptable to promote abortion “in the cases of microcephaly, as, unfortunately, some groups are proposing to the Supreme Federal Court, in a total lack of respect for the gift of life.”
Honduras Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga has also come out strongly against the notion of “therapeutic abortions” as a response to the problem. Unlike Brazil where abortion is legal in the case of rape or health of the mother, abortion remains entirely illegal in Honduras.
“We should never talk about ‘therapeutic’ abortion,” the cardinal said in a homily at a February 3 Mass in Suyap. “Therapeutic abortion doesn’t exist. Therapeutic means curing, and abortion cures nothing. It takes innocent lives,” he said.
While the World Health Organization (WHO) declared an international public health emergency February 1 on account of concerns over the virus, critics have pointed out, however, that not one death as resulted from the virus. Even on WHO’s own website the virus is described in mild terms.
“It causes mild fever and rash. Other symptoms include muscle pain, joint pain, headache, pain behind the eyes and conjunctivitis. Zika virus disease is usually mild, with symptoms lasting only a few days,” the website states. “To date, there have been no reported deaths associated with Zika virus,” it added.
Critics suspect that the crisis is being manipulated to advance an anti-human agenda on the pre-born.
“Is Zika, actually, a hideous virus that threatens to spread uncontrollably across the world creating an army of disabled children with tiny heads and low IQ’s? Or might this be a willful misinterpretation of the scarce data to manipulate public opinion and legislatures?” wrote pro-life critic Mei-Li Garcia earlier this week.
“It becomes very clear that the publicity surrounding this story has a very little to do with medicine and a lot to do with a convenient crisis that is being used by those pushing for the legalization of abortion around the world,” she wrote.
Hillary’s litmus test for Supreme Court picks: They must ‘preserve Roe v. Wade’
DERRY, NH, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) - Hillary Clinton has a litmus test for Supreme Court nominees - several, in fact. At a Democratic event on Wednesday, Clinton unveiled her criteria in selecting a judge for the nation's highest court.
“I do have a litmus test, I have a bunch of litmus tests," she said.
"We’ve got to make sure to preserve Roe v. Wade, not let it be nibbled away or repealed,” she said.
That echoes her recent call to arms speech before Planned Parenthood last month, when she stated that taxpayers must fund abortion-on-demand in order to uphold the "right" of choice.
“We have to preserve marriage equality,” Clinton said, referring to last summer's Obergefell v. Hodges case, a 5-4 ruling that redefined marriage nationwide. “We have to go further to end discrimination against the LGBT community."
Her views differentiate her from the Republican front runners. Ted Cruz has called the court's marriage ruling "fundamentally illegitimate," and Donald Trump told Fox News Sunday this week that he would "be very strong on putting certain judges on the bench that I think maybe could change things." Marco Rubio has said he won't "concede" the issue to the one-vote majority.
All Republican presidential hopefuls say they are pro-life and will defund Planned Parenthood.
Her husband, Bill Clinton, raised the makeup of the Supreme Court early last month in New Hampshire, saying it receives "almost no attention" as a campaign issue.
On Wednesday, Hillary said "the next president could get as many as three appointments. It’s one of the many reasons why we can’t turn the White House over to the Republicans again.”
Clinton said her judicial appointees must also reverse the Citizens United ruling on campaign finance and oppose a recent decision striking down a portion of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. In 2013's Shelby County v. Holder, justices struck down Section 4(b) of the act, which said that certain states and jurisdictions had to obtain permission from the federal government before changing their voting laws.
At one time, most politicians frowned upon any "litmus test" for judicial nominees, emphasizing the independence of the third branch of government. "I don't believe in litmus tests," Jeb Bush told Chuck Todd last November.
But with the rise of an activist judiciary in the middle of the 20th century, constitutionalists have sought to rein in the power of the bench.