News
Featured Image
Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger of IllinoisPhoto by Win McNamee/Getty Images

You’re invited! Join LifeSite in celebrating 25 years of pro-life and pro-family reporting at our anniversary Gala August 17th in Naples, Florida. Tickets and sponsorships can be purchased by clicking here. 

WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews) — Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives received help from three Republicans on Friday in passing legislation to expand access to abortion, including abortion-inducing drugs, even as pro-life states pass laws to protect the unborn.

On July 15, the the House voted 223-205 to pass the Ensuring Access to Abortion Act, which among other things would permit “the state-to-state transportation of abortion drugs that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration,” the Hill reported.

RELATED: Biden administration has opened the way for ‘abortion by mail on a massive scale’

Three Republicans voted in favor of the measure, despite GOP leadership recommendation that urged lawmakers to oppose it. The Republicans who signed onto the bill were Reps. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, Fred Upton of Michigan, and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania.

The pro-abortion measure, passed just three weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court rolled back the federal “right to abortion” established in Roe v. Wade (1973), would also “protect women who travel to a different state to receive an abortion if the state they are residing in” has outlawed abortion, the Hill noted.

The bill would additionally make it illegal for abortion clinics in pro-abortion states to refuse to abort the unborn babies women who have traveled from outside the state, and provide protections for people who help women travel out of state for abortion.

According to the language of the legislation, individuals may bring suit if a pro-life measure restricting abortion drugs or abortion-related travel has caused “emotional pain and suffering” or “economic losses.”

The Ensuring Access to Abortion act wasn’t the only radically pro-abortion measure advanced by Democrats on Friday.

House Democrats also voted 219-210 to pass the Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA), against full opposition from Republicans, LifeSiteNews previously reported.

The WHPA, which had failed in the Senate in May, would essentially codify Roe v. Wade by creating a federal “right” to abortion. It would also curtail a swath of pro-life measures like mandatory ultrasounds, waiting periods, and informed-consent requirements.

READ: Senate Democrats again fail to pass bill mandating unlimited abortion nationwide

In a Saturday tweet, radically pro-abortion Vice President Kamala Harris praised House lawmakers for passing the bills.

“I applaud members in the House for passing the Women’s Health Protection Act and Ensuring Access to Abortion Act,” she wrote, adding that “We must keep fighting to codify Roe into law and ensure women’s access to health care.”

Texas Republican Rep. Chip Roy told The Daily Wire on Friday that “Democrats are once again doubling down on their efforts to nationally enshrine abortion at the expense of democratically passed state laws, our Constitutional order, and the natural, pre-political right to one’s own life.”

According to Roy, this “aggressive action” is meant to “appease the most radical, profit-driven elements of the abortion industry.”

The legislative proposal to codify Roe v. Wade is expected to fail in the Senate. The Ensuring Access to Abortion Act is also likely to face stiff opposition from Senate Republicans.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

7 Comments

    Loading...