Featured Image
Chief Scientific Adviser Sir Patrick Vallance gestures during a coronavirus briefing at Downing Street on January 4, 2022 in London, England. Jack Hill - WPA Pool / Getty Images

LONDON (LifeSiteNews) — Sir Patrick Vallance, the chief scientific adviser to the U.K. government, has warned of a potential COVID variant that could “escape immunity” and take the world by surprise and called for annual COVID-19 vaccines.

Speaking to the U.K.’s Science and Technology Committee on Wednesday, Vallance said that COVID “has not gone away,” and “[is] not going to go away.”

“It’s going to be a circulating human virus for as long as we can see forward,” he said.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Say 'No' to COVID 'Vaccine Passports'!
  Show Petition Text
217346 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 225000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Powerful nations of the world, including China, the UK, and Canada are discussing plans to require so-called 'vaccine passports' as a condition for travel, and possibly to restrict entry to shopping and entertainment venues.

Israel has already put in place a system to discriminate against those who choose not to take the COVID vaccine, and, in the United States, Joe Biden has signed a new executive order which could pave the way for the implementation of a 'vaccine passport' system. [See more below.]

This kind of medical dictatorship must be resisted, and therefore, we must act quickly before these authoritarian notions take root and spread!

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition to SAY NO to government 'vaccine passports.' Tell your legislators to respect your freedom not to vaccinate without fear of repercussion.

People should not have to live in fear of government retribution for refusing a vaccine which is being rushed to market by Big Pharma and their fellow-travelers in NGOs, like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

It would be intolerable and immoral for the government to coerce someone, and their family, to take a COVID vaccine against their will just so they can do their weekly grocery shopping, go to a high school soccer game, travel on public transport, or visit their relatives who live in a different part of the country, or overseas.

Medical freedom must be respected in principle and also in practice.

So, it is now time that our policy-makers listen to all voices involved in this vital conversation, and start to represent those who will not tolerate being punished, restricted, or tracked for refusing an experimental vaccine.

Simply put, legislatures must begin to act as legislatures again.

Questions must be asked. Hearings and investigations must be held. And, the legislatures of each state and country must return to the business of representing the people who voted for them, assuming their rightful place as the originator of legislation.

We will no longer accept the dictates of executive branches without question. And, neither can we accept the dictates of some doctors who seem detached from reality and from science.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition which asks national political leaders (as well as state and provincial legislators in the U.S. and Canada) to pledge to respect the rights of those who refuse a COVID vaccine, and NOT introduce 'vaccine passports,' or any other system which would discriminate on the basis of taking the COVID vaccine.


'Biden executive order directs government to evaluate ‘feasibility’ of vaccine passports' -

'China lobbies WHO to develop COVID vaccine passports for all nations' -

'UK advances plans for vaccine passports to travel, enter stores' -

'Canada’s health minister: Gov’t ‘working on the idea of vaccine passports’' -

'European Commission president plans to introduce vaccine passports' -

'Israel’s ‘Green Passport’ vaccination program has created a ‘medical Apartheid,’ distraught citizens say' -

'LA schools to track every kid using Microsoft’s ‘Daily Pass’ COVID app' -

  Hide Petition Text

Speaking to the Royal Society conference the next day, the chief scientific adviser also mentioned a potential new variant of COVID that could “escape immunity,” as well as “future pandemics” for which the world needs to prepare.

“The room for this virus to evolve remains very large, so we could be taken by surprise again with a variant that escapes immunity,” he said.

“We’ve got no idea what the next pandemic might be and it certainly won’t be the same as this one – whatever it is, the world needs to be ready to respond,” he added.

Ignoring natural immunity, which studies have shown provides effective and long-lasting protection against COVID, the U.K. chief scientific advisor advocated for a yearly vaccine campaign, but argued against administering COVID jabs every 16 weeks (four months). This is not a “credible” approach, he said.

“What we now need to think about is what gives you a durable response because what isn’t credible, is to start having vaccines every four months for everybody; that just is not a way that it works,” he said.

Instead, he suggested giving people a vaccine every year, which he compared to administering flu vaccines.

“I think it will probably look like we’ll be doing annual vaccines for a certain part of the population as we have for flu,” he said.

“We have to move to the sensible annual cycle in my view.”

The chief scientist also praised the experimental mRNA technology used in most COVID jabs, arguing that mRNA vaccines have been “unbelievably important” during COVID “because they’ve been quick to get off the ground.”

Ignoring millions of reports of adverse events and deaths in relation to mRNA COVID vaccines worldwide, the British physician did not rule them out as potential candidates for his yearly vaccination campaign.

“They may be the right ones to give annual vaccines they might not,” he said.

Commenting on the current relief in the pandemic, Sir Patrick insisted it has been “quite an unstable period.”

He opined that the virus is “changing very rapidly” and is still posing a danger.

“It’s not a foregone conclusion that evolution to increase growth and transmission — which is what the virus does, wants to do — [is] necessarily associated with reduced severity,” he said.

The British physician has been at the forefront of pushing for COVID restrictions and his known for his ambiguous statements on the experimental mRNA vaccines.

In December 2020, he announced that face masks could be required until the following winter based on not knowing “yet how good all the vaccines are going to be at preventing the transmission of the virus.”

And in July of last year, he argued that they were “very, very effective, but not 100%,”and asserted that 60% of those hospitalized with COVID were “fully vaccinated,” but later corrected his statement saying the figure was actually for those who are unvaccinated.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.