Featured Image
Washington Cardinal Donald Wuerl and Los Angeles Archbishop Jose Gomez walk into the hall for the Synod on the Family on Tuesday morning.Lianne Laurence / LifeSiteNews

OTTAWA, Ontario, November 7, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Leaked documents show the Canadian Forces under the government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau are looking at using the country’s military to create an organization to shape the “attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of audiences.”

In an October Ottawa Citizen report, the newspaper said it was able to obtain documents which they claim show a government plan on creating a new Defence Strategic Communication group.

The goal of the group would be to move forward “national interests by using defence activities to influence the attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of audiences.”

Target audiences for the new propaganda group would be Canadians as well as foreign nationals in places where the Canadian Forces operates.

John Carpay, president of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, told LifeSiteNews that in a democracy such as Canada, the military’s purpose is to defend the country from threats, not to try and influence people’s opinion.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Urge the RCMP to launch independent investigation into the WE Charity contract deal
  Show Petition Text
6904 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 7500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Please SIGN this petition which asks the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) to launch an investigation into the controversial WE Charity contract deal.

Canadians deserve a corruption-free government, but allegations of impropriety are hanging over matters related to the WE Charity contract deal with the current government.

And, only the RCMP is positioned to launch an independent inquiry into the issues of whether or not any laws were broken, and or possible abuse of political office for personal or family gain.

Indeed, the WE Charity was criticized in June 2020 when the Canadian government selected the charity to administer the Canada Student Service Grant program, a $900 million program which would help students experiencing financial difficulties due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Of particular concern are revelations that WE Charity paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to members of the Trudeau family for past speaking engagements, and that the charity paid for Finance Minister Bill Morneau’s vacation (Morneau later repaid them).

These revelations obviously raise serious questions:

  • What is the connection between WE Charity and high-ranking government officials?
  • What, if anything, did either party stand to gain from this contract?
  • Why and how was the $43.53 M contract awarded to WE Charity without going through a competitive bidding process?
  • And, was the Lobbying Act violated?

The main concern is that the charity has deep connections with the Trudeau Family and other important government officials, and that serious conflicts of interests may have existed between members of government and the charity...and that laws may have been broken.

Although an investigation into the connection between the federal government and WE Charity was launched, questions have not been answered. Instead, more questions have been brought up.

Since the story broke, the Liberals have repeatedly delayed voting on the release of WE Charity documents.

And, just recently, a motion, which was sponsored by the Conservatives in the House of Commons and which called for an investigation into the relationships between WE Charity and the government and Ministers of the Crown and their families, was defeated.

But, the fact that the government and its political allies seem to be trying to bury this issue politically should not distract the attention of law enforcement who have a duty to ensure that government officials are held to account for serious breaches of conflict of interest.

No government leader or official should behave as though they are above the law.

Please SIGN this petition which calls on the RCMP to launch an independent investigation into the WE Charity controversy.

Then, please SHARE with your like-minded family, friends and relations.


'Politician accuses Trudeau of redacting ‘damning information’ in released docs on WE Charity scandal'

'Conservative MP grills Trudeau on family’s enrichment in WE Charity scandal'

'Scandal-plagued WE Charity shuts down Canadian operations, will leave ‘endowment’'

Photo Credit:

  Hide Petition Text

“The military has no business trying to influence public opinion in any way shape or form, and in fact, no government body does,” Carpay told LifeSiteNews.

“In a democracy, the purpose of the military is to defend the country from external threats and possibly, potentially from internal violent rebellion.”

As an example, Carpay said he believes the government's job is to protect “a person on a public sidewalk holding a sign expressing a public opinion” from “violence or threats.”

“In that instance, the government's job is to protect those individuals from violence or threats,” Carpay told LifeSiteNews.

“What the government needs to do in relation to free speech is to be like a referee that establishes parameters, establishes a framework so the government should uphold everybody's free speech rights.”

According to the Citizen, some aspects of the documents – which are still in draft form – have already been carried out on the Canadian public.

The leaked documents obtained by the Ottawa Citizen come after an October report from the same newspaper which described how the Canadian Forces had spent over $1 million on “behaviour modification training” from the SCL Group, which is the parent firm of Cambridge Analytica.

In October, the Canadian Forces were compelled to publicly admit that they had already started propaganda initiatives on citizens. This came about after a letter sent to residents in the province of Nova Scotia warning them of a pack of wolves on the loose was deemed fake by the provincial government.

The “wolves” propaganda campaign was carried out by information warfare specialists from the Halifax Rifles reserve unit, who went as far as generating wolf sounds using speakers, along with forging the logo of the Wildlife Division of Nova Scotia’s Department of Lands and Forestry or their scheme.

The Nova Scotia government itself did not realize the military was behind the deception and had branded the letter as a fake. Ultimately the Canadian Forces announced they were behind the letter.

However, the Liberal government under Trudeau is denying such a plan is in play, despite the fact the “wolves” campaign points to the contrary.

The office of Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan told the Citizen that “No such plan has been approved, nor will it be,” regarding military propaganda campaigns.

Despite the Trudeau government’s denial, Emma Briant, a professor from Bard College, went as far to say that the Canadian military’s campaign was “way over the top.”

As for the government’s new propaganda initiative, according to the Citizen, the draft plan is also proposing to create a new way in which the military can research and analyze the social media accounts of the news media, industry, non-government organizations, and Canadians in general.

A Citizen report from July shows how a Canadian Forces intelligence unit was exposed to have been secretly collecting and monitoring citizens’ social media accounts in Ontario.

The unit had claimed that they had conducted the data mining to help troops deal with nursing home care during the coronavirus.

After concerned military personal contacted the Citizen about the data mining, the Canadian Forces admitted they were behind the operation, but claimed no laws were broken.

In another Citizen report from July, Canada’s top soldier, Chief of the Defence Staff Gen. Jon Vance ordered the stop of an information operations campaign which would have used propaganda aimed at “heading off civil disobedience by the public during the coronavirus pandemic.”

Vance called the document a “weaponization” of the military’s public affairs branch according to the Citizen.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.