News
Featured Image
Pablo RodriguezCanadian House of Commons

OTTAWA  (LifeSiteNews) – After thanking the mainstream media for their Freedom Convoy coverage, Trudeau’s Heritage Minister pledged more taxpayer money to state-funded outlets.

In a late-February webinar titled “The Future of News,” run by a Liberal Party affiliated think tank, Canada’s Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez told members of the left-leaning federally subsidized media that they will be receiving even more money from the state, while thanking them for the “role” they played in framing the public’s opinion of the Freedom Convoy protest in Ottawa.  

“Journalism is one of the pillars of democracy,” Rodriguez said during the webinar, which according to Blacklock’s Reporter consisted of Toronto Star executives and other subsidized outlets. “You guys are there to cover what happens in the society at all levels. Look at the role that the journalists played during what happened in the last few weeks in Ottawa and elsewhere.” 

He added: “I mean, trying to counter that disinformation, misinformation, telling things, how they are happening.”  

“I think there are even more things we should be able to do. We’re looking into that in the context of supporting the whole ecosystem.”

Despite Rodriguez’s insinuation that the mainstream media is “free and independent” in Canada, and has the mission of countering “disinformation” and “misinformation,” Canada’s most notable media outlet, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), is dependent on taxpayer funds, and at least one former employee has accused the company of forcing their employees to report with an extreme left-wing bias.  

“In a short period of time, the CBC went from being a trusted source of news to churning out clickbait that reads like a parody of the student press. Those of us on the inside know just how swiftly — and how dramatically — the politics of the public broadcaster have shifted,” Tara Henley, former CBC producer and journalist wrote in a column dated January 3 posted to Substack. 

“To work at the CBC in the current climate is to embrace cognitive dissonance and to abandon journalistic integrity… It is to sign on, enthusiastically, to a radical political agenda that originated on Ivy League campuses in the United States and spread through American social media platforms that monetize outrage and stoke societal divisions. It is to pretend that the ‘woke’ worldview is near universal — even if it is far from popular with those you know, and speak to, and interview, and read,” added the journalist. 

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Urge U.S. Senate to vote down abortion defender Ketanji Brown Jackson
  Show Petition Text
7748 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 9000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Joe Biden’s pick to replace the retiring Justice Stephen Breyer on the U.S. Supreme Court is abortion defender D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first black woman nominated to the nation's highest court ever.

By choosing Brown Jackson, Biden is fulfilling two campaign promises at the same time: first, to use every tool at his disposal to defend and promote the killing of the most innocent; and, second, to make the nation’s highest court more "diverse."

Of course, Biden could have achieved "diversity" by different means (and, as a "Catholic," he should have), but, as throughout the rest of tenure in office, he has chosen to pursue the deadly path of promoting abortion.

And, make no mistake: Planned Parenthood and NARAL are ecstatic about Brown Jackson.

SIGN and SHARE this petition which urges all U.S. Senators to reject abortion activist Brown Jackson's nomination to the Supreme Court.

Unlike most previous nominees to the Supreme Court, Brown Jackson has a judicial history of supporting abortion - which should be enough to cause Senators to reject her.

In the 1990s, she wrote an amicus brief defending a Massachusetts law that banned protests outside of abortion clinics. Thankfully, the law was ruled unconstitutional in 2000, but it shows how Brown Jackson intends to use the law to silence free speech so that the killing can continue without protest.

Pro-lifers are unanimous in their opposition to Brown Jackson, while the pro-abortionists are undivided in their zeal for her nomination.

SIGN and SHARE this petition which urges all U.S. Senators to reject abortion activist Brown Jackson's nomination to the Supreme Court.

Carrie Severino, president of the pro-life Judicial Crisis Network, warned of an imminent free speech threat, stating that in her "buffer-zone" amicus brief, Brown Jackson "repeatedly disparaged the peaceful and often prayerful clinic protesters as engaging in ‘in-your-face’ and ‘chaotic’ activity that somehow fell short of ‘pure speech.’"

And, Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the pro-life Susan B. Anthony List stated her organization's opposition to Brown Jackson's nomination, saying: "She is on record opposing the free speech rights of pro-life advocates pleading to save lives outside abortion centers and supporting the false claim that abortion is ‘health care.’"

But, the country's top abortion groups are celebrating Brown Jackson’s appointment.

Planned Parenthood CEO Alexis McGill Johnson wrote in a tweet addressed to Jackson: "We can’t wait to see the fantastic work you will do and will be here to support you along the way,"

And, NARAL Pro-Choice America President Mini Timmaraju agreed.

"Judge Jackson … has a demonstrated record of defending and upholding our constitutional rights and fundamental freedoms — including reproductive freedom," Timmaraju said. "We are confident that she will be a voice for justice, equity, and freedom on the Court in the decades to come."

Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition which urges all U.S. Senators to reject abortion activist Brown Jackson's nomination to the Supreme Court.

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'Biden announces Ketanji Brown Jackson to replace Stephen Breyer on Supreme Court' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/biden-announces-ketanji-brown-jackson-to-replace-stephen-breyer-on-supreme-court/

'Pro-life groups warn about Biden’s Supreme Court nominee' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pro-life-groups-warn-about-bidens-supreme-court-nominee/

'These Republicans could help Biden install his far-left Supreme Court pick' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/these-republicans-could-help-biden-his-left-wing-supreme-court-pick/

**Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

  Hide Petition Text

Rodriguez also stated in the webinar that the “first thing” a “dictatorship” does is shut down the press, something the Trudeau government was accused of during the Freedom Convoy protests, with two independent reporters alleging that they were violently assaulted by police while trying to cover the three-week long protest against COVID measures.  

Andrew Lawton of the True North Centre posted a picture to Twitter showing that he had been pepper-sprayed, allegedly by the police, while Rebel News reporter Alexa Lavoie posted video footage that appears to show a police officer aiming and shooting a tear-gas canister at her as she was beaten by police batons.  

“The internet has allowed for more misinformation and disinformation, more polarization than ever before… Just look at what happened over the past few weeks [of the Freedom Convoy] for compelling evidence of that,” stated Rodriguez.  

He added: “It also changed the way we make, how we find, how we consume content especially when it comes to news, and it sadly makes it so much easier for us all to be exposed to and hurt by unacceptable, hateful content… It’s time to act decisively, and Canadians expect it, and that’s what we’re doing.”    

In accord with his statements, Rodriguez is the minister behind Bill C-11, also known as the Online Streaming Act, which the Liberal government is currently trying to push through parliament.

Dr. Michael Geist, a law professor at the University of Ottawa and Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law, commented that Bill C-11 will allow for the government’s broadcast regulator, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunication Commission (CRTC), a “virtually limitless reach” in what is deemed acceptable or not for programming. 

It is feared that Bill C-11 might further infringe on freedom of expression and freedom of the press as it could be used to force websites under the CRTC – including YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook – to remove content deemed “harmful” within 24 hours.  

“Bill C-11, the online streaming act, opens the doors to government control of Canadians through the internet through their internet activity and speech,” said Conservative MP Leslyn Lewis in opposition to the bill.  

“A prime minister who can hardly tolerate differences of opinions within his own cabinet and party cannot be trusted to respect the different opinions and preferences of Canadians,” she added.  

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

6 Comments

    Loading...