News
Featured Image
Justin Trudeau on March 24 2022, at the NATO Extraordinary SUMMIT. Brussels, BelgiumGints Ivuskans/Shutterstock

OTTAWA (LifeSiteNews) – An internet censorship bill, blasted by many as allowing the government more control of free speech through potential new draconian web regulations, passed Canada’s House of Commons yesterday.

Bill C-11, which has been pushed by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government, passed by a vote of 208 for to 117 against, with the support of the socialist NDP party and separatist Bloc Québécois.

The only party to vote against the bill was the Conservative Party of Canada, which has criticized the bill since it was introduced. Conservative MP’s were joined by one Green Party MP and one independent MP.

Liberal Minister of Canadian Heritage Pablo Rodriguez introduced Bill C-11, An Act to Amend the Broadcasting Act and to Make Related and Consequential Amendments to other Acts, in February.

The bill is now before Canada’s Senate, which will have a second reading of the legislation on Thursday. It is anticipated that the Senate will take their time in studying Bill C-11, which could extend into the fall, before voting on it. Some senators have said they will vote against Bill C-11.

It is feared that Bill C-11 might force websites under the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) – including YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook – to remove content deemed “harmful” within 24 hours, and would compel services like Netflix to have more Canadian content.

Last week, Trudeau’s Liberal government voted to shut down debate on Bill C-11. The bill was rushed through the House of Commons with over 150 last-minute amendments added, which MPs were unable to question.

Bill C-11 is very similar to Bill C-10, a bill that last year failed to pass Canada’s senate before Trudeau called an election in the fall of 2021.

The popular Canadian commentator and former University of Toronto professor Dr. Jordan Peterson blasted Bill C-11 as turning Canada into “the most censorship-laden country in the developed world.”


Dr. Michael Geist, a law professor at the University of Ottawa where he holds the Canada research chair in internet and E-commerce law, commented that Bill C-11 will allow the government’s broadcast regulator, the CRTC, a “virtually limitless reach” in what is deemed acceptable or not for programming.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Trudeau must apologize for "mass grave" smear that led to church-burnings
  Show Petition Text
2935 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 4000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

This time last year, Justin Trudeau and his media allies were at the forefront of falsely accusing Catholic institutions of having buried Indigenous children in mass graves at various residential schools across Canada.

There was and is no credible evidence to support these wild accusations, but many Canadians are still unaware of the facts.

SIGN to demand an apology from Justin Trudeau for promoting the "mass grave" smear

The anger generated by the media at home and abroad saw over twenty Canadian churches burned, and extensive damage done to many more, but the record has never been set straight in what amounts to a disinformation campaign. 

Terry Glavin at the National Post recently wrote a masterful piece that may go down in history as the definitive “debunking” of the assertions about the mass graves that never were.

Glavin points out that “nothing new was added to the public record” concerning the history of residential schools in Canada.

“The legacy of the schools had already been exhaustively explored in the testimony of hundreds of elders and a series of inquiries, public hearings, criminal cases, settlements and federal investigations going back decades. Most important of these efforts were the widely publicized undertakings of the 2008-2015 Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC), and the content of its voluminous findings,” Glavin wrote.

“…[N]ot a single mass grave was discovered in Canada last year,” he added.

“The several sites of unmarked graves that captured international headlines were either already-known cemeteries, or they remain sites of speculation even now, unverified as genuine grave sites.”

“Not a single child” accounted for during the extensively researched commission “was located in any of these places,” Glavin underscored.

“In none of these places were any human remains unearthed.”

SIGN and SHARE the petition calling on Justin Trudeau to set the record straight.

Even Trudeau's kneeling at what was reported upon as a just-discovered residential school burial ground was a lie - it was actually a well-known Catholic cemetery, but the media didn't let these details get in the way of reinforcing their narrative.

Trudeau also called on Pope Francis to come to Canada and apologize for what had happened, as outlets like Reuters, the New York Times and scores more told the world that “nearly 1000 bodies” had been found in two mass graves. 

Those online articles were quietly edited from "mass graves" to "unmarked graves", but we still have the Twitter posts from major outlets like Reuters to prove the staggering level of misinformation. 

SIGN: Justin Trudeau must tell Canadians the truth - there were no mass graves

According to an extensive investigation by Professor Emeritus Jacques Rouillard from the Université de Montréal: “The ‘discovery’ was first reported last May 27 (2021) by Tk’emlúps te secwépemc First Nation Chief Rosanne Casimir after an anthropologist, Sarah Beaulieu, used ground-penetrating radar in a search for the remains of children alleged by some to be buried there.”

“Her preliminary report is actually based on depressions and abnormalities in the soil of an apple orchard near the school – not on exhumed remains.”

Professor Rouillard opined that the unverifiable narrative of what could have amounted to child-murder has led to the false assertion of genocide, an assertion without any supporting evidence.

“By never pointing out that it is only a matter of speculation or potentiality, and that no remains have yet been found, governments and the media are simply granting credence to what is really a thesis: the thesis of the ‘disappearance’ of children from residential schools,” Rouillard wrote.  

“And all of this is based only on soil abnormalities that could easily be caused by root movements, as the anthropologist herself cautioned in the July 15 press conference.”  

The vast majority of Canadians have been misled by the media and Mr. Trudeau, believing the most incredible smears imaginable, leading to scores of attacks on churches around the country. 

It's time we heard the truth.

Please sign the petition today.

We are also cc'ing Canada's Catholic bishops on this petition - they must also demand the record be corrected, lest Canadians continue believing the mainstream media's disinformation. 

For More Information: 

How the world's media got it wrong on residential school graves - National Post

Trudeau lied about the bogus mass grave story - LifeSiteNews

Trudeau's narrative was a hoax - LifeSiteNews

**Photo: St. Jean Baptiste Church in Morinville burned to the ground on June 30, 2021**

  Hide Petition Text

Yesterday, he wrote on Twitter that “given the multiple efforts to cut off debate and limit discussion of amendments,” it is “not a surprise” that the bill passed.


“Senate has signalled a real review in the fall,” added Geist.

Geist said that “Heritage Minister @pablorodriguez got Bill C-11 through House, but at what cost?”

“(Rodriguez) Ignored concerns of 1/3 of witnesses, didn’t hear from indigenous broadcasters, cut off debate multiple times, and leveraged an embarrassing clause-by-clause review,” added Geist.

A fatally flawed gateway to government censorship

In a new report released about the dangers of Bill C-11, the Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) noted that the legislation “undermines Canadians [sic] right to express themselves and watch what they want online and that makes it harder to hold the government to account.”

“The government is trying to ram through this dangerous legislation without proper debate or real consideration of the major accountability concerns associated with this bill,” added CTF Ontario Director Jay Goldberg.

Goldberg noted that the government has “consistently claimed that user generated content will not be regulated under Bill C-11, but the text of the bill and the chair of the CRTC both say otherwise.”

“Bill C-11 will hand unelected bureaucrats the power to influence what we say and see online, including on social media,” he added.

The CTF in its report highlighted how “Ultimately, C-11 will have an impact on the way all Canadians express themselves and consume content online.”

No other democratic nation regulates user generated content through broadcasting rules in this manner. Canada would be unique among allies in doing so, and not in a good way.

Conservative Party MP and leadership candidate Dr. Leslyn Lewis has promised that if elected party leader and then Prime Minister she will repeal any internet censorship legislation being pushed by the Liberal Party that becomes law.

“A Lewis-led government will repeal C-11 and any other measure the Liberals put in place to try to control our thought and speech, and let Canadians go back to exercising the freedoms that already exist in our Charter,” Lewis wrote in a platform update posted to her campaign page over the weekend.

“I will restore a culture of respect for our constitution, our charter, and our inalienable gift of freedom,” she added.

In recent weeks and months, the federal government under Trudeau has brought forth legislation that has raised serious concerns for their apparent attack on both freedoms on the internet and in the press.

In addition to Bill C-11, there is Bill C-18 which seeks to regulate the internet and force Big Tech companies to champion selected media outlets based on a special designation given by the federal government

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

0 Comments

    Loading...