Featured Image
Donald TrumpPhoto by Scott Olson/Getty Images

WASHINGTON (LifeSiteNews) — Former President Donald Trump filed a federal lawsuit Monday in a bid to block the House of Representatives’ January 6 committee from obtaining documents from his administration, calling the request a “vexatious, illegal fishing expedition” which is “untethered from any legitimate legislative purpose.”

The former president argued that the request to comb through records of his administration is “almost limitless in scope” and violates executive privilege.

Trump has named the House select committee investigating the events of January 6, its chairman Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS), the National Archives, and national archivist David Ferriero in the lawsuit.

The legal challenge asks the D.C. District Court to issue an injunction preventing Congress from obtaining the documents, which include internal staff communications and officials’ social media posts, until the records are identified and presented for review by Trump’s team, Politico reported.

“The Committee’s request amounts to nothing less than a vexatious, illegal fishing expedition openly endorsed by Biden and designed to unconstitutionally investigate President Trump and his administration,” the lawsuit states, according to The Wall Street Journal. “Our laws do not permit such an impulsive, egregious action against a former President and his close advisors.”

The move to sue the House select committee came after the so-called January 6 committee asked the National Archives to “turn over detailed records on the actions of Trump, Vice President Mike Pence, and other members of the administration taken on January 6,” the Daily Wire reported.

The committee also requested all documentation “relating to the former president’s push to delay the certification of the 2020 election.”

The AP reported that although Trump’s lawsuit came as no surprise, his suit “went beyond the initial 125 pages of records that Biden recently cleared for release to the committee” and “seeks to invalidate the entirety of the congressional request, calling it overly broad, unduly burdensome and a challenge to separation of powers.”

In a memo released October 18, Trump spokesman Taylor Budowich argued that Trump’s lawsuit is an effort to defend “the Constitution, the Office of the President, and the future of our nation, against a ‘hyper-partisan and illegitimate investigation.’”

Laying out three pillars of the former president’s legal action, Budowich said “[t]he legislative committees’ request fails to meet the basic requirement of fulfilling a legislative purpose. The request is not just overly broad, it requests documents including campaign polling data — what does Congress hope to learn from this?”

Budowich also addressed the issue of “executive privilege,” which gives discretionary rights to the president and other executive branch officials to withhold documents from Congress or the courts.

According to the memo, “[a]n incumbent administration does not have the constitutional authority to unilaterally waive the executive privilege of a previous administration — especially one so recent. If it did, then executive privilege doesn’t exist, including for Joe Biden.”

It is unclear whether Trump will be successful in claiming executive privilege now that his administration has ended.

The spokesman also argued that since the amount of documentation requested by the committee is so broad, the National Archives has not “had the time to compile and organize the documents being requested by Congress.”

“President Trump and Joe Biden should be afforded the time to diligently review any protected and privileged documents before it is released to the public,” Budowich said.

In response to the former president’s legal action, January 6 Chairman Rep. Thompson along with committee vice-chair Republican Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming — who voted to impeach Trump following the Capitol riot — released a joint statement arguing Trump’s legal action is an effort to “stop the Select Committee from getting to the facts.”

“The former President’s clear objective is to stop the Select Committee from getting to the facts about January 6th and his lawsuit is nothing more than an attempt to delay and obstruct our probe,” the statement said.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Resist Biden's Vaccine Mandate
  Show Petition Text
28912 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 30000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

It's official: Joe Biden has announced that his Administration will be forcing COVID vaccinations on nearly 1/3rd of American citizens, blatantly disregarding the personal objections of millions of people and moving America ever closer towards a medical dictatorship.

We cannot stand for this unprecedented overreach, and we will not submit to Biden's tyrannical public coercion efforts.

Please SIGN this urgent petition informing the President that you will NOT comply with these unconstitutional vaccine mandate orders issued by the Biden Administration, and that elected officials should act in their capacity to block these intrusive demands.

On Thursday, September 9th, Joe Biden announced the latest round of federal orders meant to further coerce large swaths of the public into getting the COVID vaccine -- many against their will.

While the legal standing of these measures is, at best, dubious, the Biden Administration appears more ready than ever to gut our individual rights and practically erase medical autonomy in our country.

This latest escalation in overreach was announced via a televised speech in which Biden outlined a new "six-point plan" that includes far more than just six avenues to achieve mass medical compliance.

Among the most egregious new federal mandates are the following:

  • A requirement that all private businesses employing more than 100 people mandate their workers get the Covid-19 vaccine or submit to weekly testing (to be implemented by way of a new Department of Labor rule)
  • A requirement that all federal employees and federal contractors get the COVID vaccine
  • A requirement that all healthcare workers in facilities that receive reimbursement from Medicare and/or Medicaid (an estimated 17 million) get the Covid-19 vaccine without an alternative testing option
  • A requirement that all Head Start teachers get the COVID vaccine
  • A federal effort to lobby states to implement vaccine mandates for all school employees, and require regular testing of all students and school staff
  • A federal effort to lobby entertainment venues to require proof of vaccination or testing in order to grant entry to the public
  • A continuation of mask mandates on all federal properties and during interstate travel (i.e. planes, trains, buses)

All in all, these new vaccine mandates, which will go into effect within the coming weeks, will affect an estimated 100 million American workers -- 2/3rds of the entire workforce!

And, according to an administration official, violations of these unconstitutional requirements could result in fines of up to $14,000.

While this is clearly a political ploy on the part of the Joe Biden and his team of power-hungry Washington insiders to shift the focus from their disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan, the American public knows better: After nearly a year and a half's worth of arbitrary, ever-changing, and unconstitutional government mandates in response to the COVID outbreak, it was always a given that the Biden Administration would ramp things up even further when it behooved them.

And now, it would seem that time has officially come.

"This is not about freedom or personal choice," Biden uttered in his remarks, confirming his administration's blatant dismissal of all Americans' right(s) to accept or decline the experimental Covid-19 vaccine.

This is a stunning reversal from Biden's declaration last December that "I don’t think [the vaccine] should be mandatory, I wouldn’t demand it to be mandatory."

In fact, Biden even confirmed his intention to flout states' rights in the process, warning that "If these governors won’t help us beat the pandemic I’ll use my power as president to get them out of the way."

These are not the words of an "empathetic" leader; these are the words of an aspiring dictator. And, for the time being, the only way to stop Joe Biden's tyranny is through mass noncompliance.

As we've said from the beginning, science, basic logic, and common sense should dictate policy regarding COVID and the Delta variant.

But Joe Biden and the federal government have long abandoned those principles throughout this crisis, culminating into this disturbing yet inevitable flurry of intrusive vaccine mandates that use people's jobs, individual autonomy, and livelihood as leverage.

This assault on our individual rights, private businesses, and American workers cannot be tolerated, and the easiest way to combat these unlawful orders is to just say NO.

Please SIGN and SHARE this most important petition letting Joe Biden know that you will NOT comply with the unconstitutional medical demands being made by this administration, and that action should be taken to block any intrusive action against working Americans and private employers.

Thank you!


'Biden announces vaccine requirements for private businesses, impacting tens of millions of Americans':

  Hide Petition Text

“Precedent and law are on our side. Executive privilege is not absolute and President Biden has so far declined to invoke that privilege. Additionally, there’s a long history of the White House accommodating congressional investigative requests when the public interest outweighs other concerns. It’s hard to imagine a more compelling public interest than trying to get answers about an attack on our democracy and an attempt to overturn the results of an election,” Cheney and Thompson argued.

Meanwhile, Trump’s team asserted that the January 6 Committee’s attempt to gain access to a trove of Trump-administration records is an effort to score “political wins for the Democrats” and amounts to a “political persecution” of the former president and his allies.

In the memo announcing Trump’s lawsuit, Budowich said “[t]he Committee is motivated by one thing: delivering political wins for the Democrats. That’s why they’ve set a rapid timetable that steamrolls the Constitution, legal precedent, and established process.”

“The Committee isn’t seeking the truth, it’s seeking Communist-style political persecution of President Trump and the America First patriots who served their country honorably,” Budowich said.

The Daily Wire noted that on October 8, President Joe Biden “declined to invoke executive privilege over the requested documents,” greenlighting the release of the records to the January 6 Committee.

According to the report, White House counsel Dana Remus wrote a letter to archivist Ferriero requesting he release 125 pages of documents identified by President Biden to the committee.

“The President instructs you, in accord with Section 4(b) of Executive Order 13489, to provide the pages identified as privileged by the former President to the Select Committee,” Remus wrote.

“In light of the urgency of the Select Committee’s need for the information, the President further instructs you to provide those pages 30 days after your notification to the former President, absent any intervening court order,” she said.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.