News
Featured Image
 Sergei Elagin/Shutterstock

SAN FRANCISCO, California (LifeSiteNews) — Twitter’s board of directors has unanimously advised its stockholders to approve free-speech proponent Elon Musk’s offer to purchase the social media platform for $44 billion, according to a Tuesday Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing.

The big tech company said in the SEC filing that “after considering various factors,” the Twitter Board “has unanimously: (1) determined that the merger agreement is advisable and the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are fair to, advisable and in the best interests of Twitter and its stockholders; and (2) adopted and approved the merger.”

Twitter’s shareholders will still need to vote on the deal, Newsmax noted.

The New York Post reported that the board’s decision puts Musk “one step closer to completing his $44 billion takeover of Twitter”, which has faced serious pushback from free speech advocates over the years for cracking down on disfavored political speech on topics including the COVID-19 debate, election integrity, and transgenderism.

RELATED: House GOP launch new investigation of Facebook, Twitter for suppressing Hunter Biden laptop story

Musk, a self-described “free speech absolutist” and founder of Tesla and SpaceX, has made no secret of his plans to expand free speech on Twitter.

In a June 14 tweet, Musk, who said he plans to vote Republican in the 2022 midterms and recently tipped his hat to Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis as a promising presidential candidate for 2024, argued that a “platform cannot be considered inclusive or fair if it is biased against half the country.”

In an all-hands meeting with Twitter staff last week, the world’s richest man explained that he’s in favor of “allowing people who have relatively extreme views to express those views within the bounds of the law,” adding that a proper ideological balance of Twitter would see the extreme left and extreme right equally discontented.

READ: Elon Musk promotes free speech, transparency, nonpartisanship in all-hands meeting with Twitter staff

While the Tuesday filing indicates Musk is nearing acquisition of Twitter, Fox News pointed out that during an interview at the Qatar Economic Forum Tuesday, Musk said that shareholder approval was just one of three “unresolved matters” that currently blocks the deal from going through.

According to Fox, Musk is also awaiting debt financing from Morgan Stanley Senior Funding Inc. and other institutions, as well as a resolution regarding the number of fake and spam accounts which make up Twitter’s daily traffic.

Last month, Musk had put the multibillion dollar offer on hold pending investigation into the true number of fake accounts on the platform. While Twitter had stated its percentage of spam accounts is roughly 5%, some researchers put that number much higher, at 9-15%, according to Reuters. Last month, Musk stated he believes the number is at least 20%.

RELATED: Nearly half of Biden’s Twitter followers are spam bots or inactive accounts, audit finds

Musk’s deal to purchase Twitter has undergone a series of negotiations and roadblocks since the billionaire first offered to buy the company in April after becoming Twitter’s largest shareholder earlier the same month.

Prior to agreeing to sell to Musk, Twitter had attempted to buck the Tesla CEO’s unsolicited offer, unsuccessfully opting to use a “poison pill” tactic in a bid to shake off the hostile takeover, LifeSiteNews reported.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

2 Comments

    Loading...