Pro-abort senator grills Gorsuch: Is Roe v Wade ‘super precedent’?

Gorsuch refused to make 'campaign promises' about which cases he supports or thinks were decided incorrectly.
Featured Image
Claire Chretien By Claire Chretien

Claire Chretien By Claire Chretien

WASHINGTON, D.C., March 21, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) – Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch refused to label Roe v. Wade "super precedent" today as Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-CA, attempted to grill him on abortion. 

Throughout day two of his confirmation hearing, Gorsuch repeatedly refused to make "campaign promises" about which cases he would support and which he wouldn't, saying judges shouldn't be like politicians. He indicated there are a number of factors that go into analyzing precedent. 

"Do you view Roe has having super precedent?" asked Feinstein.

Roe v. Wade "has been reaffirmed many times. I can say that, yes," said Gorsuch.

Earlier in the hearing, he said of Roe v. Wade, "A good judge will consider it as precedent of the United States Supreme Court worthy as treatment of precedent like any other."

Conservatives on Twitter pointed out that "super precedent" isn't a real legal term – and precedents have been unjust before.

Feinstein suggested on Monday that Gorsuch shouldn't be confirmed because of his belief that "the intentional taking of a human life by private persons is always wrong."

Finished reading? Want to make a difference?

You depend on our news reporting. We depend on you. Make an impact today.

Share this article