Featured Image
Union JackShutterstock

Big Tech is censoring us. Subscribe to our email list and bookmark to continue getting our news.  Subscribe now.

LONDON, England, January 22, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – In an attempt to encourage increased COVID-19 testing, even if a positive test leads to a mandatory self-isolation order, British cabinet ministers are considering paying anyone in England £500 (around $680) if they test positive for COVID-19, The Guardian revealed. The scheme, if given the green light, could cost U.K. taxpayers upwards of £450 million per week.

Currently the British government’s “Test and Trace Support Payment scheme” (TTSP) provides a weekly payment of £500 to those who test positive for COVID-19, cannot earn a living by working from home, have a low income, and receive some manner of government benefits.

Under current legislation, anyone in England who is contacted by NHS Test and Trace is “under legal obligation” to self-isolate for at least ten days, as is anyone who receives a notification that they have been in “close contact” with “someone who has tested positive for coronavirus,” through the government run app. The latter group is eligible for a one-off £500 payment through TTSP.

According to The Guardian, government polling in England discovered that a mere 17% of people with COVID symptoms were presenting themselves for tests, which led the Department of Health and Social Care, headed by Health Secretary Matt Hancock, to propose a new incentive whereby anyone in England, regardless of income, could take advantage of the £500 payment if testing positive for COVID-19.

The revelations came from a leaked document drafted by the Department of Health, which The Guardian says is the “preferred position” of Hancock’s department. An official review of the current scheme determined that the application process for payment to self-isolate is too tight and excludes too many people. The government is seeking to expand the scheme so that more people will feel comfortable taking COVID tests, even if that leads to a mandatory self-isolation order.

The report advised that “[a]nyone who tested positive for COVID-19, irrespective of their age, employment status or ability to work from home, would be eligible for TTSP. This would be straightforward for local authorities to administer, though it would lead to significantly greater volumes of applications than under the current scheme.” This is the Health Department’s first choice.

The Department forwarded three alternative proposals, one which qualified that payments could only be made to those who can’t work from home, another which stipulated a low-income threshold of £26,495 (about $36,000) for the lump sum payment, and a final suggestion that keeps the current, more restrictive measurements; but “significantly” expands the ability of local councils to make discretionary payments.

Backing the Health Department’s preferred option, Professor Stephen Reicher, a government adviser from the Scientific Pandemic Insights Group on Behaviours, told the BBC that “you can’t have a system where people don’t know whether they will get the support or not, it has to be immediate. The way to do that is to make it universal.”

Loughborough University professor Duncan Robertson added his voice to those vying for increased testing, saying: “We need to ensure that people are incentivised to come forward for a test, to self-isolate if that test is positive, and not to become infected to collect the bounty.”

The Department of Health did recognize that the expanded payment scheme “could possibly cause perverse incentives for some people who are not working to catch the virus in order to test positive and be paid £500, but the likelihood of this is considered low.”

In addition to a financial incentive to receive a COVID test, the Health Department’s report also nodded towards increasing police powers, such that the police can request health data to enforce self-isolation orders more easily.

The report noted that “[c]ontrary to previous assurances given to the public, this will mean sharing health data (i. E., an indication of who has tested positive for COVID-19) with the police if someone is reported to have breached their legal duty, but this is considered a necessary and proportionate measure — and data-sharing agreements will provide that the information is not used for any other purposes.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Shut down big government NOT small business
  Show Petition Text
22592 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 25000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Many small businesses are being forced to close temporarily or even permanently under the strain of a second wave of government-imposed COVID shutdowns.

This is totally and thoroughly wrong...especially when big business, government, and large segments of the professional world are totally insulated from the repercussions of the shutdowns.

Something drastic needs to be done now!

SIGN this urgent petition calling for state legislatures to cut the salaries of governors and mayors who are responsible for closing small businesses by enacting draconian COVID shutdown measures.

The bottom line is that the people imposing shutdown measures need to feel the bite of the restrictions they are imposing on other peoples' livelihoods so that they have a personal incentive to re-open their economies and make accommodation for the survival of small businesses.

Local restaurants, cafes, gyms, clothiers, bookshops, florists, and many more, are being forced to shut their doors, some forever.

Americans who have spent their entire lives building their business - and, taken all of the risk - stand to lose everything.

But, the following are all considered essential and never get shut down: lawyers, lobbyists, politicians, courts, big corporations, and the media...

And, to add insult to injury, some politicians who are imposing these shutdowns, like Democratic Governor Andrew Cuomo, are actually getting huge pay raises starting in the new year. Cuomo's raise is $25,000 next year alone!

This is utterly scandalous! It is time to say enough is enough!

If small business owners are being CRUSHED by government COVID restrictions, the politicians responsible should also feel the BITE of those restrictions!

This is the only way to make the "political class" understand how devastating their shutdowns truly are to small business owners and their employees.

Small businesses are the backbone of our economy, supply millions of jobs to people across the country, and ironically provide the taxes used to fund the programs so loved by most of the governors and mayors.

Because of the nature of small and medium businesses, their owners and workers are on the frontlines of the COVID crisis.

They need to be rewarded for this bravery, not closed down.

Accommodation needs to be made for small businesses so that they can weather this storm and thrive after it has passed. These are businesses we all love using, and we want them to be there long after COVID is just a bad memory.

When this is all over, do we really want every coffee shop to be a Starbucks or Dunkin' Donuts, or every restaurant to be a McDonald's?

The answer is not only "no," but "Heck, no!"

Therefore, governors and mayors need to be personally incentivized to do everything in their power to see that small and medium businesses can survive and thrive - AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE.

That's why we're calling on state legislators to cut the salaries of all governors and mayors who are imposing draconian shutdowns where no accommodation is being made for small businesses.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition today!

**Photo Credit:

  Hide Petition Text

Speaking to the BBC, Environment Secretary George Eustice said he hadn’t yet seen the document from the Department of Health but that “we’ve got to consider all sorts of policies in order to make sure that people abide by the rules, are able to abide by the rules and we get the infection rate down.”

Eustice told Sky News that the country needs “people, if they are asked to self-isolate because they have been contacted through our test and trace, we do need them to self-isolate.” He added that “[no] decisions have been made on this. But this is a dynamic, fast-moving situation with the pandemic.”

The BBC reported that the prime minister has not considered the proposal to revise the TTSP scheme. An official spokesperson for the prime minister, however, has denied any claims that the scheme will be expanded beyond its current state, saying: “We’ve given local authorities £70m for the scheme and they are able to provide extra payments on top of those £500 if they think it necessary. That £500 is on top of any other benefits and statutory sick pay that people are eligible for.”

A spokesman for the Department of Health added that “[we] are in one of the toughest moments of this pandemic and it is incumbent on all of us to help protect the NHS by staying at home and following the rules.”

Almost 96,000 people with a positive COVID-19 test have died in the U.K. in just about one year. With a population of over 66 million, this amounts to 0.14 percent of the population dying within one year.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.