News
Featured Image
James Cleverly

LONDON, December 8, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – As the first COVID-19 vaccinations were rolled out today in the U.K, the government refused to rule out whether immunization cards will be used as a form of “passport” in order to access daily life. 

In an interview with Sky News, government minister James Cleverly repeatedly avoided the question as to whether cards were “passports” and if they would be used in order to permit or ban people from normal activities. 

“It’s about unlocking people’s lives, it’s about unlocking the economy, it’s about making sure we protect lives and protect livelihoods,” Cleverly stated. Pressed to comment on the cards effectively being passports, Cleverly dubbed the question as “semantics.” 

Cards will be issued along with a vaccination, and images of the new card have now emerged. An inscription on the card states, “Make sure you keep this record card in your purse or wallet.” Space is also allocated to detail the dates and names of the vaccines given.

A document compiled by Public Health England mentions that people should keep the vaccine record card “safe,” reportedly as a measure to ensure that the next appointment is not missed, and the correct follow-up jab is given.

The government previously rejected the possibility of so-called vaccine passports, as minister Michael Gove claimed that neither he nor others in the government were planning to implement such a system. “I certainly am not planning to introduce any vaccine passports and I don’t know anyone else in government (who is),” Gove said. 

However, Gove also mentioned in his interview that various businesses and venues might enforce their own policy, requiring a vaccine card for admittance. “I think you’ll probably find that restaurants and bars and cinemas and other venues, sports venues, will probably also use that system – as they have done with the (test and trace) app.” 

“Individual businesses have the capacity to make decisions about who they will admit and why,” he continued.

Speaking to the MailOnline about the UK vaccine record card, Grey Collier of the human rights group Liberty, said “immunity cards risk creating a two-tier system in which some of us have access to freedoms and support while others are shut out.”

Collier continued, “Once cards like these have been created it would be easy for their use to be extended so they can be used like an immunity passport. This could result in people who don’t have a card potentially being blocked from essential public services, work or housing – with the most marginalised among us hardest hit.”

Sir Desmond Swayne, a vocal critic of the UK government’s lockdown policy, also spoke to the Daily Mail, calling the new move “coercion.” He warned that the message taken from it would be that people “will be able to have access to your civil liberties if you behave in the way we require by having this vaccine.”

A government minister recently mentioned to The Telegraph that a QR vaccine passport could be required for access into public events: “One way of opening up society would be those people who have had vaccinations carrying some kind of QR code or some sort of immunity certification which shows that they have been tested.” 

The proposal for QR codes as evidence for having received a COVID vaccine has already been raised by Ticketmaster. While their plan is still under development, the company suggests that after purchasing tickets, fans will be required to verify that they have been vaccinated against COVID-19 or tested negative for the virus 24-72 hours before the concert.

The U.S. government recently released images of its own vaccine record card, which will be given to everyone who receives a COVID-19 vaccine. Releasing the image on the Department of Defense (DOD) website, the description says they “will be sent out as part of vaccination kits from Operation Warp Speed.”

In an October article, Dr. Michael Yeadon, who “spent over 30 years leading new (allergy and respiratory) medicines research in some of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies,” and retired from the COVID-19 vaccine developer Pfizer, with “the most senior research position in this field,” dismissed the COVID-19 vaccine. 

“There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic,” Yeadon said. “I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines. You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects.”

The technology involved in administering the vaccine, as used by Pfizer and Moderna, is so novel that it has yet to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration, as admitted by Pfizer itself. 

It also avails of “messenger RNA,” which directly affects a person’s cells, and is “a vaccine technology that’s so new, no mRNA vaccines have ever been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.”

Doctors from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), advising the CDC, warned that patients needed to be informed about the side effects of COVID-19 vaccines. According to a report from CNBC, Dr. Sandra Fryhofer of the American Medical Association stressed that “We really need to make patients aware that this is not going to be a walk in the park,” she said. “They are going to know they had a vaccine. They are probably not going to feel wonderful. But they’ve got to come back for that second dose.” 

Some of the immediate results from some of the vaccine trials have included “severe” complications, involving headaches, fever, body aches and symptoms similar to a “severe hangover.”

— Article continues below Petition —
SIGN: Join petition calling for a stop to COVID vaccine testing in Europe
  Show Petition Text
16484 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 17500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Concerns over the health and safety of the human test subjects in Pfizer's European COVID vaccine study have caused two eminent doctors to launch a petition calling for an immediate halt to those studies.

On December 1, 2020, Dr. Michael Yeadon, an ex chief of research at Pfizer and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a lung specialist and former department head of public health lodged an appeal to the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for approving drugs across the EU, asking them to suspend the ongoing Pfizer/BioNtech COVID vaccine study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).

LifeSite is joining Drs. Yeadon and Wodarg in their call for an immediate suspension of this study and we are encouraging people to co-sign their petition to the EMA which is to be found in the petition section on this page.

Please SIGN and SHARE this important petition, and then please contact the EMA at the address listed below, in the 'For More Information' section.

In their application to the EMA, Drs. Yeadon and Wodarg give the following reasons why the Pfizer study could pose dangers to the health and safety of the study participants:

  • First, the doctors say that the study design must be improved as the highly inaccurate PCR test is currently being used to detect the presence of COVID in the study participants. This means that the efficacy of the vaccine is in doubt. The doctors recommend changing from the PCR test to Sanger sequencing.
  • Second, and more important, the doctors advocate animal testing of the vaccine to exclude the possibility of the risks to the life and health of human participants from known side-effects of other similar studies on corona viruses.

These side-effects can include: an exaggerated immune response when the subject comes into contact with the "real world" virus; possible infertility of an "indefinite duration" for women; severe allergic responses to polyethylene glycol which is contained in the mRNA vaccine being tested by Pfizer; and, other latent, serious side effects which, because of the short duration of the study, may only become known well after the conclusion of the study.

Because of these unacceptable risks to the life and health of the Pfizer/BioNtech COVID vaccine study participants, we are joining with Drs. Yeadon and Wodarg as co-signers of their petition to the European Medicine Agency, asking for an immediate halt to these studies.

Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING, today!

And, after you have signed this petition, please send the sample email in the section below to the official European Medicine Agency email: [email protected]

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Actual Petition Text (pdf): https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf

Sample Email:

Subject: Please act on the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon and stay the Phase III clinical trial(s) of BNT162b

Dear Sir or Madam,

I am hereby co-signing the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon to support their urgent request to stay the Phase III clinical trial(s) of BNT162b (EudraCT Number 2020-002641-42) and other clinical trials. The full text of the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon can be found here: https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf

I hereby respectfully request that EMA act on the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon immediately.

Regards, [Your name]

**Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

RELATED:

5 questions about the coronavirus vaccine that should scare everyone
Pfizer COVID jab warning: No breastfeeding, avoid pregnancy for 2 months, unknown fertility impacts
UK begins COVID vaccinations starting with a 90-year-old
Facebook ramps up censorship, ‘will start removing false claims’ about COVID vaccine

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.