LONDON, England (LifeSiteNews) – The United Kingdom’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) has advised the British government that a deadly new variant of the novel coronavirus, which they say could thwart the immunization gained from the experimental COVID-19 vaccines and be able to kill one in three people, is a “realistic possibility.”
A document drawn up by SAGE on July 31 examining the “long term evolution of SARS-CoV-2” purports to “describe hypothetical scenarios by which SARS-CoV-2 could further evolve and acquire, through mutation, phenotypes [variants] of concern, which we assess according to possibility.”
The first possible scenario suggested by the group was of the development of a viral strain which is vastly more lethal than the Delta variant currently being transmitted in the U.K. and thought to be responsible for 99 percent of COVID-19 infections.
By a process known as recombination, the Delta variant, the group explains, could cross with the Beta variant, for example, and give rise to a new strain with characteristics of both viral variations. This led SAGE to predict the possibility of coronaviruses with mortality rates in line with SARS-CoV, at around 10 percent, and MERS-CoV with a case fatality rate of 35 percent.
The government advisors, who were not named, offered a list of possible solutions to counter such an occurrence, including “vaccine booster doses to maintain protection against severe disease,” and the development of “improved prophylactic and therapeutic drugs for SARSCoV-2 and disease symptoms,” which they said should be stockpiled.
People of goodwill can disagree about the safety, efficacy and religious implications of a new vaccine for the coronavirus.
But, everyone should agree on this point:
No government can force anyone who has reached legal adulthood to be vaccinated for the coronavirus. Equally, no government can vaccinate minors for the coronavirus against the will of their parents or guardians.
Please SIGN this urgent petition which urges policymakers at every level of government to reject calls for mandatory coronavirus vaccination.
Fear of a disease - which we know very little about, relative to other similar diseases - must not lead to knee-jerk reactions regarding public health, nor can it justify supporting the hidden agenda of governmental as well as non-governmental bodies that have apparent conflicts of interest in plans to restrict personal freedoms.
The so-called "public health experts" have gotten it wrong many times during the current crisis. We should not, therefore, allow their opinions to rush decision-makers into policies regarding vaccination.
And, while some people, like Bill Gates, may have a lot of money, his opinion and that of his NGO (the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) - namely, that life will not return to normal till people are widely vaccinated - should not be permitted to influence policy decisions on a coronavirus vaccination program.
Finally, we must also not allow the rush by pharmaceutical companies to produce a new coronavirus vaccine to, itself, become an imperative for vaccination.
Unwitting citizens must not be used as guinea pigs for New World Order ideologues, or Big Pharma, in pursuit of a vaccine (and, profits) which may not even protect against future mutated strains of the coronavirus.
And it goes without saying that the production of vaccines using aborted babies for cell replication is a total non-starter, as the technique is gravely immoral.
However, if after sufficient study of the issue, a person who has reached the age of majority wishes to be vaccinated with a morally produced vaccine, along with his children, that is his business.
But we cannot and will not permit the government to make that decision for us.
Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition, urging policymakers at all levels of government to reject mandatory coronavirus vaccination.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Bill Gates: Life won’t go back to ‘normal’ until population 'widely vaccinated' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bill-gates-life-wont-go-back-to-normal-until-population-widely-vaccinated
COVID-19 scare leads to more digital surveillance, talk of mandatory vaccine 'tattoos' for kids' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-19-scare-leads-to-more-digital-surveillance-talk-of-mandatory-vaccine-tattoos-for-kids
Trudeau says no return to ‘normal’ without vaccine: 'Could take 12 to 18 months' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-says-no-return-to-normal-without-vaccine-could-take-12-to-18-months
Trudeau mulls making coronavirus vaccine mandatory for Canadians - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-mulls-making-coronavirus-vaccine-mandatory-for-canadians
US bishop vows to ‘refuse’ COVID-19 vaccine if made from ‘aborted fetal tissue' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-bishop-vows-to-refuse-covid-19-vaccine-if-made-from-aborted-fetal-tissue
** While LifeSite opposes immorally-produced vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines, we do not have a position on any particular coronavirus vaccines produced without such moral problems. We realize many have general concerns about vaccines, but also recognize that millions of lives have been saved due to vaccines.
*** Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com
Additionally, the scientists proposed the equally “realistic possibility” of a “variant that evades current vaccines,” due to the same problems arising from viral recombination. It is possible, they said, that the spike gene sequence found in COVID-19 could recombine with other coronaviruses to create a partially or completely new spike gene sequence “against which our current battery of spike glycoprotein-based vaccines [mRNA jabs] would not work.”
The calculated impact from a completely original spike synthesis would be “high,” according to the report, but only “medium” if the genetic sequence was partially new, owing to a proportion of the population already expressing antibodies to “endemic” seasonal coronaviruses.
In the case of a completely new spike protein coming to the fore, the group advised that “a similar vaccine platform could be rapidly employed as has been used successfully on the original Wuhan SARS-CoV-2 and subsequent variants.”
Scenario three saw the group posit the “[e]mergence of a drug-resistant variant” of COVID as a result of the application of anti-viral drugs to defeat the virus. Specifically, SAGE warned that “drugs that target the viral 3C protease” and “drugs that target the polymerase, monoclonal antibodies that target the spike glycoprotein” could be rendered impotent, if used “as a mono therapy.” Although the group did not name any specific treatments to be in danger of producing a drug-resistant strain, ivermectin works on COVID-19 in the manner described by SAGE.
The group suggest that, to avoid the emergence of drug-resistant variants from anti-viral mono therapies, such treatments should only be utilized “for an emergency in which a SARS-CoV-2 variant is more severe, and a matched vaccine is unavailable and takes time to develop.”
Finally, the advisory group proposed that COVID-19 could realistically become “fully adapted to the human host” in the long-term, meaning that it would essentially become like other human coronaviruses “that causes common colds.” The virus would be endemic at this stage, but would not bring with it severe disease.
Within a section named “[g]eneral considerations for further reducing the impacts of variants,” the group of scientists urged the British government to adopt a number of protocols to help drive down the likelihood of variants forming. One area identified by SAGE as a possible route for viral strain development could be through animals which harbor the virus.
Recombination with variants carried by animals like cats, dogs, and other animals known to have contracted the virus could give rise to a new strain capable of infecting humans. A report in the Daily Mail suggested that, like in Denmark where minks are routinely destroyed “in their thousands,” the British government should prepare to cull animals, wild and domestic, to stop transmission of a new COVID variant.
Additionally, the group suggests the government “proactively support a strategy of worldwide effective vaccination.” However, reports are emerging which point to COVID variants developing from those who have received jabs against COVID-19 as opposed to those who have not taken the shot.
A study published in Scientific Reports details the possibility of what are called “escape mutants,” versions of viruses that come to be from high immunity levels, be it through vaccination or infection-driven immunity, and that bypass those defenses.
Such high immunity forces “selective pressure,” which gives an advantage to the strains which can continue to be infective despite vaccination and natural immunity.
In fact, Dr. Joseph Mercola, M.D., writing for The Defender, explained that jabbed individuals may actually be driving the development of new COVID variants, since high vaccination rates increase the selective pressure on viruses to survive and, indeed, thrive.
“Viruses mutate all the time,” Mercola said, “and if you have a vaccine that doesn’t block infection completely, then the virus will mutate to evade the immune response within that person.”
Since the COVID shots do not completely halt the ability to be infected with the virus, but rather “at best lessen the symptoms of that infection,” Mercola said that “if SARS-CoV-2 does end up mutating into more lethal strains, then mass vaccination is the most likely driver.”
On the contrary, the doctor noted that in “an unvaccinated person, the virus does not encounter the same evolutionary pressure to mutate into something stronger,” meaning that people not vaccinated against COVID-19 do not pose the same survival threat to the virus and as such do not force selective pressure to the same extent.
LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.