Featured Image

June 28, 2017 (SPUC) — The British Medical Association's membership has voted to make the decriminalization of abortion official policy.

Delegates at the meeting (which can be viewed online) voted in favor of motion 50, proposed by Dr. Coral Jones of the City & Hackney Division, which calls for a change in the law, effectively decriminalizing abortion on demand, for any reason, up to 28 weeks.

Human rights abuses?

In his opening report, Dr John Chisholm, who chairs the BMA medical ethics committee, said that the BMA has “a moral duty to speak out against abuses of ethics and human rights.” However, when it came to summing up the debate, he only spoke about the arguments in favour of the motion. Dr. Peter Saunders of the Christian Medical Fellowship tweeted: “John Chisholm has misled the #ARM2017 about both conscience and upper limits as both would fall with the abortion act if decriminalized.”

Odds stacked

The BMA represents two-thirds of Britain’s doctors and delegates had been instructed to read a 52-page discussion paper which claims to be neutral, although it has been jointly prepared by several of the doctors in favor of decriminalizing abortions including Professor Wendy Savage and Professor Emily Jackson, a radically pro-choice medical lawyer.

Professor Savage, who has previously said she supports sex-selective abortion, was one of the medics speaking in favor of the motion. 

Listen to women

Several young female doctors and medics spoke out against the motion, with many pointing out that polling shows women want more restrictions on abortion, not less. “If we trust women, let's actually listen to them” said one delegate. Others argued that deregulating abortion would put women at risk — for instance “women in abusive relationships wouldn’t be protected.” Another speaker also pointed out the practical arguments against the motion, asking: “do we care so little about women and their unborn babies that we would pass such a ill-thought motion?”

Abortion extremists

One opposing speaker placed the debate firmly in the context of the wider campaign to remove all restrictions on abortion. “Make no mistake, this motion is part of an organized campaign to change UK law … This motion is not coming from a groundswell of opinion amongst BMA members. No, it's coming from a very small minority of extreme campaigners. Please RB, don't make the BMA the unwitting stooge of these extremists.

In the run-up to the vote, around 1,500 doctors and medics signed an open letter opposing the motion.

Commenting on the news, Dr. Anthony McCarthy of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children said: “The BMA has betrayed all who take seriously healthcare for pregnant woman in favor of an extremist agenda in line with the abortion industry’s laissez faire 'up to birth' attitude to ending the lives of unborn children. Against overwhelming public opinion and against those who support women by refusing to trivialise abortion, the BMA has today undermined the consciences of doctors who refuse to follow an ‘autonomy’ agenda that has nothing to do with good medicine and everything to do with ideology.”

Reprinted with permission from the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.