News

WASHINGTON, July 11, 2002 (LSN.ca) – Republicans in Congress are fast-tracking their latest attempt to ban partial-birth abortion, hoping to bring it to the House of Representatives in two weeks. President Bush has promised to pass such a bill if Congress can get it through (after Bill Clinton vetoed two such bills), but it is not clear that the new bill would survive a Supreme Court review.  Rep. Steve Chabot’s bill would ban the procedure except to save “the life of the mother” but not her so-called “health”—one of the problems the Court found with the Nebraska bill. Instead, the new version states: “The facts indicate that a partial-birth abortion is never necessary to preserve the health of a woman, poses serious risks to a woman’s health and lies outside the standard of medical care.”“This bill, as written, is clearly unconstitutional,” said Simon Heller, a lawyer who helped overturn a 2000 Nebraska law. But Robert A. Destro, law professor at Catholic University of America’s Columbus School of Law, says: “This case could be won.”  To read Washington Times coverage see:  https://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20020710-895824.htm

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.