Featured Image
Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin speaks at a news briefing at the Pentagon on July 20, 2022 in Arlington, Virginia. Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

(LifeSiteNews) – The U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee is demanding that the Department of Defense (DOD) “immediately” halt its initiative to purge “extremists” from the military.

The recently-published Senate report, which accompanies the 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), takes aim at the bill’s proposed initiative to combat “extremism” in the military. At least half a million dollars have been set aside for anti-extremism training and analysis.

The recent Senate report blasted the military’s “anti-extremism” effort as unwarranted, declaring, according to Roll Call, “[t]he committee believes that the vast majority of service members serve with honor and distinction, and that the narrative surrounding systemic extremism in the military besmirches the men and women in uniform.”

“The committee believes that when extremist activity does in fact occur that it must be dealt with swiftly and appropriately; however, the case incident rate does not warrant a Department-wide effort on the issue,” the report continued.

Emily Rainey, a former Army Special Operations psychological warfare officer who was featured in Tucker Carlson’s “Patriot Purge” series, told LifeSiteNews that the money devoted to the anti-extremism effort only “scratches the surface of the massive iceberg that is the new extremism policy.”

The 2023 NDAA, HR 7900, provides for “in person counseling” regarding “extremist activity” for military members who have violated the DOD guidelines on extremism, which now includes in its definition “Advocating widespread unlawful discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex (including pregnancy), gender identity, or sexual orientation.”

Rainey highlighted that the military’s current extremism policy now punishes “thought crime,” and that “the net that they cast is so incredibly wide” as to encompass “literally every single conservative pundit and conservative American.”

“You’re looking at a slow purification process,” said Rainey, noting that Christian conservatives, who believe, for example, that gender is simply and objectively biological, are being targeted through the military’s current extremism policy.

Among the ways in which a member of the military can violate the extremism provision are donating to an “extremist” group, rallying in support of such a group, and “knowingly displaying paraphernalia, words, or symbols in support of” such a group, “such as flags, clothing, tattoos, and bumper stickers, whether on or off a military installation.”

Upon taking office, President Joe Biden swiftly took action that again put traditional Christians at risk in the military, by reopening the military to “transgender” soldiers.

Rainey, who had submitted her military resignation before 2020 because she “saw the writing on the wall,” told LifeSiteNews that she would be court-martialed if she didn’t allow a soldier to “transition” their sex, something she was trained on.

Rainey told LifeSiteNews that her attendance at the January 6 rally for election integrity was seized upon by the media to help drive the narrative that extremism is a problem in the military, and eventually by the DOD itself. At the time, left-wing pundits used incidents of violence and property damage that occurred at the Capitol to lump every rally attendee — the vast majority of whom were peaceful and law-abiding— into an “extremist” category.

According to Rainey, by the time the DOD had ordered a Stand-Down “to address extremism in the DOD” on February 1, 2021, she was the only active-duty military member known to be present at the January 6 rally that was being broad-brushed as a radical “insurrection.”

Pentagon Press Secretary John F. Kirby suggested at the time that the Stand-Down was prompted by the finding that active duty military as well as veterans had “stormed the Capitol” on January 6. 

Rainey, who led a group of about a hundred mostly middle-aged and older women to the rally, had not herself entered the Capitol, was completely law-abiding, and had informed her superiors of her attendance to the rally. It had also been over a year since she had submitted her resignation, which was backed up in processing due to COVID-19.

Moreover, those she led to the Capitol were members of a non-partisan group called Moore County Citizens for Freedom. However, it was widely publicized that Army officials were investigating her trip to the Capitol.

— Article continues below Petition —
Hunter Biden’s Laptop Exposes Presidential Corruption! Demand FULL TRANSPARENCY from the Mainstream Media NOW!
  Show Petition Text
6050 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 7500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

UPDATE AUGUST 29, 2022 — Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg admits to Joe Rogan that the FBI was interested in supressing the Hunter Biden Laptop story! 


If you are not aware of the foreign security threats implicated in the "Hunter Biden Laptop Story" — and what they might mean for America's national security and foreign geopolitical affairs — that’s by design. 

You were never meant to discover the contents compromising President Joe Biden, and for good reason. The mainstream media kept you ignorant on purpose.  

In fact, the New York Post was censored by Twitter, Facebook, and all of Big Tech for even breaking the story that Hunter Biden’s laptop existed. 

The New York Times, Washington Post, and the entire mainstream media called any reference to the story “Russian disinformation." 


SIGN: Tell the Mainstream Media that viewers demand transparency on the Bidens NOW!

Enough is enough — America refuses to be kept wondering about our compromised national security, corrupt sweetheart business deals, and pay-to-play schemes detailed in the Hunter Biden Laptop. 


“Polling taken in April shows that nearly two-thirds of Americans believe that the president has been compromised by his family’s shady business dealings with China,” LifeSiteNews reported on July 1, 2022.  

Even CNN has finally begun to admit that the Hunter Biden Laptop is a serious problem

  • Illegal gun purchase
  • Sweetheart foreign Ukraine deals 
  • Political access to (then) Vice-President Joe Biden 
  • Federal probes and investigations  

Voters MUST know for whom they are voting. Sound the alarm with our new petition! SIGN TODAY! 

The First Amendments protects a Free Press to report the truth and protect the American people — but the mainstream media has betrayed its viewers, spinning pro-communist and pro-globalist narratives that are HURTING voters! 

Voters MUST learn about President Joe Biden’s compromised business dealings with China, Russia, Ukraine, and so many others — all pointing to the Hunter Biden Laptop. 


Media executives must learn that their viewership will continue tanking as long as executives run cover for their far-left base.  

Tell media executives that you will NO LONGER watch or trust their network until they fully reveal the contents of the Hunter Biden Laptop! 

It is not enough to simply change the channel. We must leave a parting shot to mainstream media executives telling them WHY consumers are refusing to watch any longer. 


This is the only way to save the future of the media and win back a trustworthy Free Press for future generations.  

There is no telling what the mainstream media will continue to hide, deny, and deflect if they decide to run cover for the most powerful man in the world — the President of the United States. 

*** There is no time to lose—we refuse to let important information remain hidden from the American voters any longer! *** 

The Hunter Biden Laptop story is the single greatest piece of evidence indicating that America’s national security is likely compromised.  

We the People deserve to know the truth! 





NY Post: photo from the Hunter Biden Laptop 

Flickr: Officia do Palácio do Planalto. CC BY 2.0.  

Photos combined. 

  Hide Petition Text

As part of the Stand-Down, the DOD had launched a Countering Extremism Working Group (CEWG) to be headed by Bishop Garrison, who had previously branded all Trump supporters as extremists, tweeting in 2019, “…any supporter of former President Donald Trump unequivocally supports extremism and racism… There is no room for nuance with this.”

The CEWG’s subsequent report “didn’t actually list which groups would be considered extremist,” NPR admitted, although it held military members “responsible for what they do on social media.” The group found 100 incidents of “prohibited extremist activity” among 2.1 million active and reserve military, “or a case rate of 0.005%,” The Washington Times reported.

The recent Senate report pointed out that real military extremism is highly uncommon, stating, “Spending additional time and resources to combat exceptionally rare instances of extremism in the military is an inappropriate use of taxpayer funds, and should be discontinued by the Department of Defense immediately.”

The report is “non-binding” and subject to removal from the final NDAA, and has been under fire from congressional Democrats. Army veteran Bill Braniff, director of the University of Maryland’s National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START), insisted the “policing of anti-government extremism” is necessary for the “good order and discipline” of the military, citing specifically the problems of “white supremacy, support for jihadism, misogynist extremism,” and “anti-LGBTQ+ extremism.”


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.