News

By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman

  WASHINGTON, May 14, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The Supreme Court has refused to hear the appeal of a Chinese couple seeking asylum from China’s brutal One Child Policy.

  Asylum applicant Yi Qiang Yang married his wife when he was 20 and she was 17, defying Chinese laws that suppress population growth by requiring men to wait for marriage until the age of 22 and women until the age of 20.  Yang’s lawyers claim they married in a private religious ceremony.

  When authorities discovered that Yang’s wife was eight months pregnant, they forced her to have an abortion because she had become pregnant before the legal age of marriage, according to testimony submitted by Yang’s attorneys.

“The fetus was placed in a bag and disposed of in front of Ling” states Yang’s legal brief.

  Yang’s attorney writes that “Because traditionally married spouses are unable to register their marriages with the government, the state treats such couples who have children as violators of the population control policy.”  He adds that “Such couples are often subjected to forced abortions or sterilizations” according to the Christian Science Monitor.
 
  China’s One Child Policy, which has been in effect since the 1970s, regularly forces women to undergo abortions if they have more than a single child in urban areas, or two children in rural areas.  Those who are unmarried under Chinese law are prohibited from having any children.

  Yang’s petition for asylum had been turned down in previous rulings, apparently because the federal judges heari

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.