WASHINGTON, October 18, 2004 ( – The US Supreme Court has denied the request of three plaintiffs to hear their case against Planned Parenthood. The women accuse Planned Parenthood of refusing to educate women about the link between abortion and breast cancer.

The original lawsuit was launched in August, 2001, by Agnes Bernardo of Chula Vista, Pamela Colip of Loma Linda, and Sandra Duffy-Hawkins of Sacramento. The women simply wanted Planned Parenthood to begin providing women with accurate information about the overwhelming evidence that abortion raises breast cancer risk; they were not suing for monetary damages.  The Supreme Court dismissed the case, upholding an earlier decision by the California Supreme Court, while ordering the women to pay legal fees in excess of $77,000.  “Twenty-eight out of 37 studies published since 1957 have associated this elective surgical procedure with breast cancer,” Karen Malec, president of the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer, said, following the launch of the suit in 2001. “Women have a right to make fully informed decisions concerning their own health. If women are denied crucial information about the risks of a procedure, can it really be said that a choice ever belonged to them?”“Accurate information about the research has been censored by Planned Parenthood and its supporters since abortion was legalized in the U.S. nearly three decades ago,” Malec charges. “It was censored by the same people who ardently professed that they cared about women’s health. Planned Parenthood’s greed will cost women their lives and devastate families. This is a travesty of justice.”

See related reporting from  Medical Journals Censor Information on Abortion – Breast Cancer Link   tv


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.