News
Featured Image
Supreme Court Justice Clarence ThomasDrew Angerer/Getty Images

LifeSiteNews is on the cutting edge of life and family news reporting. Support our Summer Campaign by giving a gift of support today: give.lifesitenews.com

WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews) — The U.S. Supreme Court delivered a huge victory for Americans’ Second Amendment rights on Thursday, striking down a law that had placed heavy restrictions on the ability to lawfully carry firearms in public.

In the 6-3 majority opinion penned by conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, the Court declared that a New York law requiring people to declare a particular need to carry a gun as a prerequisite for obtaining a concealed carry permit infringed on Americans’ constitutional right to “keep and bear arms,” the Associated Press reported.

The ruling defending gun ownership comes as Congress advances legislation aimed at curbing Americans’ rights to own and carry weapons in the wake of several recent mass shootings. Democrats and some left-leaning Republicans have responded to the shootings by pushing for stricter gun control measures, while conservatives have called for different solutions, including tighter security measures at schools.

Thursday’s Supreme Court ruling signals the nation’s highest court may be poised to limit or reject future gun control efforts.

In the majority opinion, Thomas wrote that legislation demanding citizens prove their need to carry a weapon “is not how the Second Amendment works when it comes to public carry for self-defense.”

“We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need,” Thomas said, explaining that New York’s restrictive law blocked “law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their right to ‘keep and bear arms’ in public.”

Thursday’s decision, which the AP highlighted as “the high court’s first major gun decision in more than a decade,” was split along ideological lines, with the six conservative justices agreeing that the New York law violated the right to keep and bear arms. The Supreme Court’s three liberal justices, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan and Sonya Sotomayor, dissented from the majority opinion, Axios noted.

WATCH: Trudeau says you ‘cannot use a gun for self-protection in Canada’

In a Thursday statement, the National Rifle Association (NRA) hailed the New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen ruling as a “watershed win” for gun rights in America.

“Today’s ruling is a watershed win for good men and women all across America and is the result of a decades-long fight the NRA has led,” NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre said in a statement. “The right to self-defense and to defend your family and loved ones should not end at your home.”

Meanwhile, U.S. President Joe Biden, who has long pushed for sweeping gun control measures including bans on so-called “assault rifles” and high-capacity magazines, called the decision “deeply disappointing,” and urged Americans to “make their voices heard on gun safety” because “[l]ives are on the line.”

Vice President Kamala Harris also said she was “deeply concerned and troubled by the Supreme Court’s ruling today,” adding “it defies common sense and the Constitution of the United States.”

It’s unclear how a ruling upholding Americans’ Second Amendment rights defies the Constitution.

While the Supreme Court’s ruling struck down a specific gun control law in New York, the decision won’t just impact residents of the Empire State.

The Associated Press reported that the landmark ruling will likely open the door to “more people to legally carry guns on the streets of the nation’s largest cities — including New York, Los Angeles and Boston — and elsewhere.”

Roughly 25% of the U.S. population currently resides in states that have enacted gun control measures similar to the New York law, the AP report noted, meaning that a large swath of Americans will now see their right to lawfully carry firearms in public expanded even in blue states and cities.

The Supreme Court’s decision upholding Americans’ Second Amendment rights came days after the nation’s highest court also upheld the First Amendment right to free exercise of religion Tuesday by striking down a Maine law that cut religious schools out of its taxpayer-funded tuition assistance program, LifeSiteNews previously reported.

READ: Supreme Court declares Maine law blocking tax dollars from religious schools unconstitutional

In another 6-3 decision, with a majority opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court ruled in Carson v. Makin that Maine’s law prohibiting taxpayer school choice dollars from going to religious institutions was unconstitutional.

The decision has been regarded as a major win for American parents who want to send their children to schools that align with their values and beliefs. The Washington Free Beacon characterized the ruling as “the biggest victory the school choice movement has ever achieved in the Supreme Court.”

The decisions on gun control and school choice come amid a flurry of other rulings as the Supreme Court winds down its term.

Despite handing down nine rulings this week alone, however, the Court has yet to release its official decision in the much-anticipated Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization case, which concerns Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban and could result in the overturning of the federal “right to abortion” established in Roe v. Wade (1973).

Many expect the Court to rule in favor of Mississippi by fully overturning both Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), which upheld Roe, after the unprecedented leak of a draft majority opinion in Dobbs last month.

RELATED: Leaked majority opinion shows Supreme Court may overturn Roe v. Wade

According to the leaked draft, the Supreme Court’s precedent creating a “constitutional right to abortion” was “egregiously wrong from the start.”

An official decision is expected in Dobbs any day. The Court is slated to issue another round of opinions Friday.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

4 Comments

    Loading...