VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) — The Vatican has written of its “surprise and regret” after Chinese Communist Party authorities violated the “spirit of dialogue” of the secretive Sino-Vatican deal by installing a bishop in a diocese not recognized by the Vatican.
In amongst a number of announcements issued by the Holy See Press Office on November 26th was a statement regarding the recent installation of Bishop John Peng Weizhao as auxiliary Bishop of Jiangxi on November 24.
The Vatican’s statement reads:
The Holy See noted with surprise and regret the news of the “installation ceremony,” which took place on c.m. 24 in Nanchang, of H.E. Msgr. John Peng Weizhao, Bishop of Yujiang (Jiangxi Province), as “Auxiliary Bishop of Jiangxi,” a diocese not recognized by the Holy See.
Continuing, the Vatican wrote that the ceremony “did not take place in accordance with the spirit of dialogue that exists between the Vatican and Chinese sides and what was stipulated in the Provisional Agreement on the Appointment of Bishops, Sept. 22, 2018.”
As reported by AsiaNews, Peng was appointed auxiliary by Bishop John Baptist Li Suguang, the vice-president of the Chinese Catholic Bishops’ Conference which is not recognized by the Holy See. The ceremony took place in Nanchang, witnessed by approximately 200 people.
The website of the Communist state-approved Catholic Bishops’ Conference gave an account of the ceremony, noting that Peng made a number of promises, including:
willing to abide by the commandments of God, do his best to assist the bishop and priest, faithfully preach the gospel, lead the gods and members of the Jiangxi Parish, abide by the national constitution, maintain the unity of the motherland and social harmony, patriotic love, and adhere to the principle of independent and independent churches,
adhere to the direction of Chinese Catholicism, actively guide Catholicism to adapt to socialist society and contribute to the realization of the Chinese dream of the great revival of the Chinese nation.
Peng was in fact ordained into the underground Catholic Church as bishop of Yujiang in April 2014 , and given a mandate by Pope Francis to succeed Bishop Thomas Zeng Jingmu, the current head of the local underground Church at the time.
Peng was then arrested within weeks by the authorities, and later released in November 2014.
However, AsiaNews reported that on September 22 of this year, Peng informed his diocesan clergy that he had resigned his position in Yujiang, the post given him by the Pope, and had “accepted the government’s plan to integrate all the dioceses into one, the Diocese of Jiangxi.”
This new diocese is one which owes its existence to the Chinese authorities rather than the Holy See, as China has unilaterally amalgamated neighbouring dioceses into the new Diocese of Jiangxi.
Peng, reported AsiaNews, also participated in the ceremony laying the foundation stone of the bishopric of the new diocese.
“On that occasion he was also presented by official Catholic organisations controlled by the Communist Party of China as a role model for sinicisation, the key word indicated by Xi Jinping for the future of religions in China,” AsiaNews continued.
Labour MP Stella Creasy has threatened to table an amendment to the Government’s upcoming Bill of Rights to give women the “fundamental right to an abortion”.
Ms Creasy has already been instrumental in imposing abortion on Northern Ireland, promoting DIY abortion, and banning pro-life vigils around abortion clinics. Now she wants to remove any restrictions on abortion. She even wants decisions on abortion law to be taken out of the hands of elected politicians by making it a “right”.
Sign this petition calling on Prime Minister Rishi Sunak to resist any attempt to make abortion a right.
There is no right to abortion in international law. None of the nine core treaties of the United Nations recognises abortion as a human right (including the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women).
Instead, several human rights instruments recognise the right to life of children before birth. The Declaration of the Rights of the Child states: “... the child by reason of his physical and mental immaturity, needs special safeguards and care, including appropriate legal protection before as well as after birth...”
There can be no right to end the life of an innocent unborn child.
The UK already has some of the most permissive abortion legislation in Europe. A right to abortion would make the situation here even worse. Creating an absolute “right” to abortion would logically mean removing any restrictions. The worst implications of this could include:
• The removal of any gestational limits, allowing abortion up to birth
• Abortion based on the gender of the baby
• The removal of medical safeguards, including the involvement of doctors
• Erosion of conscience rights for medical professionals
Sign this petition to tell Mr Sunak not to make abortion a right.
The overturn of a Court decision in the United States has no direct implications for abortion law in the UK, which is regulated by Acts of Parliament. The regulation of a controversial issue such as abortion should lie with democratically elected MPs, not the courts. Robert Buckland MP, the former Justice Secretary, has warned that enshrining abortion as a right “risks bringing our courts into the political arena as in the United States”.
Tell Mr Sunak to stand up for parliamentary democracy and a true understanding of human rights, and resist any attempt to make abortion a right.
The news site suggested that Peng had faced considerable pressure from the authorities which led to this decision. The Vatican also referenced this in its statement, writing:
What is more, the civil recognition of Bishop Peng was reportedly preceded by long and heavy pressure from local authorities.
In closing, the Vatican outlined a desire that such episodes would “not be repeated,” noting that it had not been properly informed about the installation ceremony by the relevant authorities.
The Vatican’s statement, despite revealing to what extent Beijing was the dominant factor in the Sino-Vatican deal, noted that that the Holy See was happy to “continue respectful dialogue concerning all matters of common interest.”
The Holy See hopes that similar episodes will not be repeated, remains awaiting appropriate communications on the matter from the Authorities, and reaffirms its full readiness to continue respectful dialogue concerning all matters of common interest.
Observers were swift to ridicule the Vatican for its choice of language in the statement, with The Spectator’s Damian Thompson writing that “the wicked Vatican deal has just blown up in Francis’s face.”
The wicked Vatican deal has just blown up in Francis’s face. Now let’s see Ivereigh and his parrots talk their way out of this one. https://t.co/lmGT4NnHmx
— Damian Thompson (@holysmoke) November 26, 2022
— Alberto Miguel Fernandez (@AlbertoMiguelF5) November 26, 2022
#CCP China violates the spirit and terms of the provisional Sino-Vatican deal by installing a bishop in a diocese not recognized by the Holy See.
Vatican says it is disappointed.
When will the lesson be learned?
— Samuel Gregg (@DrSamuelGregg) November 26, 2022
The situation regarding Bishop Peng highlights the bizarre relationship the Vatican is attempting to build with the Communist regime in China. Moreover, the years between Peng’s 2014 consecration and his 2022 installation as bishop of Jiangxi highlight the marked alteration brought about by theVatican’s secretive deal with Communist China.
In 2014 the bishop was consecrated into the underground church with a Papal mandate, the same underground Church which – in the words of Cardinal Joseph Zen – the Vatican is “selling out” by virtue of its secretive 2018 deal. It is that same deal – described by Zen as “an incredible betrayal” – which the Vatican has referenced when protesting Peng’s recent installation.
Thus, Peng has been consecrated bishop of one diocese with the approval of the Pope, while (years later) being made bishop of another diocese which is not recognized by the Holy See.
Zen, the emeritus bishop of Hong Kong, has also accused Pope Francis of “encouraging a schism” through his promotion of the deal. He suggested that the Vatican’s silence over China’s long record of human rights’ abuses and persecution of the Church was perhaps an attempt “to establish diplomatic relations with (China).”
Following Zen’s criticism of the deal, Francis then refused to meet the cardinal in September 2020, claiming he was “very busy,” despite the cardinal only having been allowed out of Hong Kong for 120 hours.