News
Featured Image
Archbishop Arthur RocheTvsvizerra.it

VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) – The head of the Vatican’s liturgical department, Archbishop Arthur Roche, has described the provision of the Latin Mass in the past 30 years as an “experiment” which “has not entirely been successful,” in words which appear to directly contradict those of Pope Benedict XVI.

Speaking to an Italian-speaking Swiss news channel, Roche commented on the recent severe restrictions imposed on the Latin Mass by Pope Francis in Traditionis Custodes. Issued July 16, the motu proprio made the striking statement that “[t]he liturgical books promulgated by Saint Paul VI and Saint John Paul II, in conformity with the decrees of Vatican Council II, are the unique expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite.”

Roche, the prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments (CDWDS), echoed the papal statement in a brief video clip.

“The normal form of the celebration of the Roman Rite is found in those documents that have been published since the Second Vatican Council,” he declared.

Repeating Pope Francis’ words, Roche described Pope John Paul II’s 1988 document Ecclesia Dei and Pope Benedict XVI’s 2007 document Summorum Pontificum, as merely an attempt to establish unity with the Society of Saint Pius X.

Ecclesia Dei and Summorum Pontificum (SP) were established in order to encourage the Lefebvrists, above all, to return to full unity with the Church,” claimed Roche.

“It’s clear that Traditionis Custodes is saying ‘okay, this experiment has not entirely been successful,’ and so let us go back to what the [Second Vatican] Council required of the Church,” continued the archbishop.

Defending the sweeping cuts made to the Latin Mass by Pope Francis, Roche highlighted the liturgy which stemmed from the Second Vatican Council as the future for the Church. “And we’ve got to remember that this [the liturgical reform] wasn’t the will of the Pope. This was the will of the vast majority of the bishops of the Catholic Church, who were gathered together in the 21st ecumenical council, guiding the Pope with regard to the future.”

The Tridentine liturgy he described as being “entirely appropriate” for its time, but seemingly not for the current time in the Church: “What was produced in 1570 was entirely appropriate for the time. What is produced in this age is also entirely appropriate for the time.”

Roche doubling down on attack on traditional liturgy

The archbishop’s most recent comments come in light of a recently leaked letter he wrote to fellow Englishman, Cardinal Vincent Nichols of Westminster, in which Roche claimed that the Latin Mass was “a liturgy at variance with Conciliar reform (and which, in fact, was abrogated by Pope Saint Paul VI), and an ecclesiology that is not part of the Church’s magisterium.” The claim was quickly, and hotly contested by devotees of the traditional liturgy.

Archbishop Roche also claimed to be ignorant of the famous Heenan Indult of 1971, which safeguarded the continuation of the Latin Mass in England in the immediate aftermath Vatican II. Roche wrote that “there is no evidence of an indult or of any correspondence” in the Vatican’s archives, a point which was contested by Dr. Joseph Shaw, Chairman, Latin Mass Society of England and Wales.

— Article continues below Petition —
SIGN: Show Pope Francis the Latin Mass will survive any suppression
  Show Petition Text
34723 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 35000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

LifeSiteNews will hand-deliver this petition to the Holy See, recording the moment traditional Catholics from around the world stood up for the Traditional Latin Mass.

Pope Francis has issued a new decree, "Traditiones Custodes," severely restricting the celebration of the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM).

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition with other Catholics, and ask the Pope to reconsider this new and divisive Motu Proprio.

Pope Francis' decree clamps down hard on the TLM. In it, he effectively does away with Pope Benedict's protection of it, handing bishops in every diocese the right to suppress it, while demanding new priests get permission from their bishop and the Vatican to offer the Mass of the Ages. 

As Catholics who value Tradition and know the place of the Magisterium in safeguarding the Deposit of Faith, it is time to speak up and have our voices heard

Francis has decried rigidity and intolerance for years, but now is showing intolerance and rigidity himself by forcing his very narrow understanding of liturgy on one of the true sources of good fruit in the Latin Rite of the Catholic Church.

Our Lord said that "a bad tree cannot bear good fruit", and yet we see more and more souls drawn to Christ through the TLM, with marriages dedicated to God and open to many children, and vocations also abounding in traditional seminaries, orders and priestly societies.

Indeed, the Traditional Latin Mass has been a source of unity for the Catholic Church for more than 1500 years, producing great saints, repentant sinners, and souls won for Christ across the world. *Read below how Benedict XVI decried attacks against the TLM and its adherents.

To attempt to restrict the Traditional Latin Mass, as a new generation are rediscovering the treasures of God's Church, will inevitably cause further division and hurt among the faithful, risking the loss of some souls who will regretfully turn away

Souls are now at stake with this Motu Proprio, as some will drift away from the Deposit of Faith in disillusionment, while others that are far from God will never be touched by the profound beauty and reverence found in the Traditional Latin Mass. 

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition to Pope Francis, urging him to reconsider his decision, not least for the good of souls and the glory of God, and making sure as many cardinals support the TLM as possible. 

Click "Show Petition Text" on the right to read the letter to Pope Francis.

Finally, please pray, fast and do penance for the salvation of souls, including that of our shepherds, during this turbulent time in Church history.

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'BREAKING: Pope Francis abrogates Pope Benedict’s universal permission for Old Mass' - www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-abrogates-pope-benedicts-universal-permission-for-old-mass

'ANALYSIS: Pope restricts ‘divisive’ Traditional Latin Mass, says 52-yr-old Novus Ordo is ‘unique expression’ of Church’s liturgy' - www.lifesitenews.com/news/analysis-pope-restricts-divisive-traditional-latin-mass-says-52-yr-old-novus-ordo-is-unique-expression-of-churchs-liturgy

* Pope Benedict XVI (Spirit of the Liturgy, 2000):

"For fostering a true consciousness in liturgical matters, it is also important that the proscription against the form of liturgy in valid use up to 1970 [the older Latin Mass] should be lifted. Anyone who nowadays advocates the continuing existence of this liturgy or takes part in it is treated like a leper; all tolerance ends here. There has never been anything like this in history; in doing this we are despising and proscribing the Church’s whole past. How can one trust her at present if things are that way?"

**Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

Roche in disagreement with Pope Benedict XVI

Following both his letter to Cardinal Nichols, and his recent interview, Roche has been sternly criticized by liturgy scholars for appearing to be ignorant of crucial texts relating to the traditional liturgy. The prefect of the CDWDS also appears to be ignorant of key texts which were written by Pope Benedict, both as pope and as Cardinal Ratzinger.

Contrary to Roche, in his letter accompanying Summorum Pontificum Pope Benedict XVI wrote that the traditional liturgy was “never juridically abrogated.”

“There is no contradiction between the two editions of the Roman Missal. In the history of the liturgy there is growth and progress, but no rupture. What earlier generations held as sacred, remains sacred and great for us too, and it cannot be all of a sudden entirely forbidden or even considered harmful,” wrote the pontiff.

Liturgist Father John Hunwicke also noted how, contrary to Roche’s view, such Papal teachings cannot be rejected so swiftly. “It is, in my judgement, Catholic Doctrine that the Apostolic Tradition is not subject to rogue functionaries,” Hunwicke stated.

Hong Kong’s Cardinal Joseph Zen also weighed in against Roche, writing: “From a friend of mine: ‘Pope Benedict made it explicitly clear that Summorum Pontificum had much broader aims than merely the reconciliation of the SSPX. Archbishop Roche knows this but says otherwise. Why?’” 

New Liturgical Movement contributor Matthew Hazel posited then Cardinal Ratzinger’s words in 1986 against Roche’s depiction of the Latin Mass having been created for its time. 

“The Council of Trent did not ‘make’ a liturgy…It is absolutely contrary to the laws of liturgical growth, and it has resulted in the nonsensical notion that Trent and Pius V had ‘produced’ a Missal four hundred years ago,” wrote Ratzinger.

“How is it possible for the current Prefect of the CDWDS to be so utterly, completely ignorant of the history of the liturgy and its reforms? How?,” queried Hazell.

“It is rapidly becoming difficult to avoid the conclusion that the CDWDS is currently being led by an ignoramus, entirely unsuited to the job…,” he added.

Meanwhile, The Spectator’s Damian Thompson, a frequent critic of Archbishop Roche, said that Roche “is shamelessly twisting the truth about the Latin Mass.”

RELATED

Dominican priest slams Pope Francis’ Traditionis Custodes as ‘contrary to the Faith

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.