News
Featured Image
Libero Milone in conversation with the Register’s Ed Pentin Screenshot/Ed Pentin - YouTube

VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) — The Vatican is reportedly attempting to derail the $10 million lawsuit which has been brought against the Secretariat of State by the Vatican’s former Auditor General and his deputy – a lawsuit which threatens to reveal evidence of the financial and moral corruption within the Holy See that the pair’s financial audit had uncovered.

Speaking to journalists November 17, Libero Milone – the former Vatican auditor general – stated that the Vatican has rejected the defense lawyer he chose, giving no reason for doing so.

Milone, a former chairman and CEO of Deloitte Italy, was appointed Auditor General of the Holy See in 2015, accompanied by his deputy, Ferruccio Panicco, an ex-chief auditor for the Italian manufacturer Indesit.

As previously reported, the pair filed a 53-page lawsuit on November 4 of this year against the Secretariat of State for the amount of $9.25 million, to “obtain proper reparations from suffered damages” consequent upon their unjust dismissal in 2017.

READ: Former Vatican Auditor General sues Holy See for nearly $10 million, threatens to reveal financial corruption

The suit argues that they were unjustly accused of spying and embezzlement in June of 2017 by Cardinal Angelo Becciu – at the time, second in charge of the Secretariate of State – accusations which, they argue, stemmed from their audit which uncovered widespread corruption within the hierarchy of the Holy See.

Their lawsuit states that a “picture will emerge of the leadership of the Holy See that is very little compatible with the mission entrusted to it by Providence.”

Milone and Panicco chose Romano Vaccarella as their legal representation in the proceedings. Vaccarella, an accomplished lawyer, served a five year term as a judge in Italy’s Constitutional Court, and who has also represented the country’s former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi. 

However, after submitting their lawsuit to the Vatican Tribunal on November 4, Milone and Panicco were informed on November 16 that Vaccarella had not been authorized to represent them, with no reason given for this. 

According to a source close to Milone, the move by the Holy See will significantly inhibit the lawsuit against the Secretariat of State. The National Catholic Register reports that Vaccarella had been working on their case for two years. 

Speaking to the Register, Milone said the Vatican’s decision had “flabbergasted” him, and that they were appealing it. 

Libero Milone making comments at a Nov. 17 press conference. (Michael Haynes/LifeSiteNews)

Quoting from “a source close to Milone,” the Register reported the source as stating: “Refusing to authorize Vaccarella is a rudimentary violation of due process and shows how desperate they are.” 

Vaccarella, added the source, “is the best that’s going and would have been formidable.”

LifeSite contacted Milone about the Vatican’s rejection of Vaccarella, who stated he had no further comment on the matter.

Background of trial

Milone has continuously insisted that Becciu’s accusations against him and Panicco are absolutely false. 

He also argues that the the accusations were the result of his audit uncovering uncomfortable financial corruption like the infamous London apartment deal, which cost the Vatican hundreds of millions of euros, investments in pharmaceutical companies that produced abortifacients and contraceptives, contrary to the Church’s moral doctrine, embezzlement by high-ranking cardinals and officials, and money laundering conducted by the Secretariat of State and the Vatican Bank.

“I was threatened with arrest,” Milone said of his forced resignation. “The head of the Gendarmerie [the Vatican police] intimidated me to force me to sign a resignation letter that they had already prepared weeks in advance.”

At the time of their firing, the Vatican claimed that it had conducted a more than seven-month investigation into Milone and Panicco.

But in 2018 the charges were later dropped when the Vatican’s chief prosecutor stated that not only had there been no investigations, but there were no sentences filed against Milone in the Vatican’s legal record. Despite this, the Holy See refused to release a statement clearing Milone and Panicco’s names, notwithstanding numerous requests over a number of years.

During questioning as part of Becciu’s own trial, the former official at the Secretariat of State claimed that it was Pope Francis himself who intervened to fire Milone. 

READ: Pope Francis ordered resignation of Vatican auditor accused of spying, cardinal testifies

Becciu is currently standing trial alongside nine other people connected to the financial scandal surrounding a Vatican property investment in London which he authorized. The cardinal “personally authorized” transactions and allegedly kept them off official Vatican ledgers in order not to draw the attention of Cardinal George Pell, then-Prefect of the Secretariat for the Economy.

Becciu was then indicted for corruption in July 2021 by the Vatican Tribunal, along with nine others. He was personally charged with “embezzlement and abuse of office, also in collaboration, as well as subornation.” 

Becciu is also accused of having channeled money to his brother’s charity, using funds overseen by the Secretariat of State, €100,000 of which came from the Pope’s personal charity, Peter’s Pence.

With files from Louis Knuffke

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

7 Comments

    Loading...