News
Featured Image
New York State CapitolShutterstock

Big Tech is censoring us. Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news.  Subscribe now.

January 12, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — Today, victims of domestic violence and others filed a class action lawsuit against Governor Andrew Cuomo challenging the constitutionality of New York’s pro-abortion Reproductive Health Act (RHA). This is the first time a New York abortion law is challenged for violating both women’s rights and the rights of children, including viable unborn children.

The complaint, among other things, asks the court to acknowledge First Amendment rights for women whose unborn children are killed by assailants, to clarify dangerous ambiguities in the RHA that impact women, and to affirm existing, but previously unrecognized, rights for near-term unborn children and children who survive abortion.

Plaintiffs are represented by a team of attorneys serving as special counsel to the Women’s Alliance Against Violence, an initiative formed to challenge the RHA and other laws that increase violence against women and children.

In January 2019, New York enacted the RHA. This controversial law introduced a number of changes to New York law, including ones that, according to the Women’s Alliance Against Violence, an initiative of the Thomas More Society, harm children and incentivize domestic and intimate partner violence against pregnant women.

The changes include a new definition of “person” under New York criminal law. New York now excludes all unborn children, including viable unborn children — or fetuses capable of surviving outside the womb, with or without medical intervention — from the legal definition of “persons” who can be victims of homicide. This change alters nearly two hundred years of New York criminal law, according to the suit.

“This new definition is devastating,” states Christen E. Civiletto, one of the attorneys filing the federal action. Civiletto, an experienced litigator who handles complex federal and state court lawsuits, explains that “because a criminal assailant can no longer be separately charged for the death of an unborn child, the RHA escalates the threat of harm to women and unborn children and incentivizes deadly violence against women.”

“New York has stripped women and their families of their ability to pursue justice for those deaths,” adds Civiletto. “That’s outrageous. In fact, it is contrary to the stated policy of the RHA itself: to affirm the “fundamental right [of women] to choose to carry the pregnancy to term, to give birth to a child.”

According to the most recent data published by New York State’s Division of Criminal Justice Services, domestic violence against women in New York has increased. News reports also reveal multiple lethal attacks against pregnant women in New York since the RHA’s passage, states the complaint, with the latest having been recorded on surveillance video.

“Violence against women and girls, including pregnancy violence, is a human rights violation of epic proportions. We should be enacting, rather than repealing or amending, laws created to deter violence and save human lives. How can we speak of progressivism and feminist ideals yet turn a blind eye to laws that escalate violence against women in the name of ‘choice’?” challenges attorney Michele Sterlace, Executive Director of Feminists Choosing Life of New York.

“The RHA represents a willful and tragic exaggeration of abortion rights,” says attorney Teresa S. Collett. She notes, “The new law converted a woman’s liberty interest in terminating her pre-viable pregnancy into a novel right to kill near-term unborn children and inexplicably extended this right to criminal assailants.” Civiletto agrees, “The RHA unconstitutionally authorizes the killing of near-term children in utero based on a ‘right’ that finds no warrant in Roe v. Wade.”

“People believe that women’s reproductive rights and the recognition of rights for near-term children are mutually exclusive. They are not,” Collett adds.

— Article continues below Petition —
State legislators: Protect our freedoms from radical leftists starting Jan. 20th
  Show Petition Text
12235 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 12500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

For the next two years, state legislators will be the last line of defense against a radical, leftist ideology invading every aspect of our lives.

Our federal institutions - especially, the judiciary - utterly betrayed America and the Constitution in their dereliction of duty towards seeking the truth in the outcome of the 2020 election.

And now, with the Senate in the hands of the leftists, freedom-loving Americans must DEMAND that our state institutions, and every patriotic state legislator, do everything in his or her power to oppose the assaults on our Freedom, on Life, on Family, and on Faith which are sure to come from Washington, D.C. after January, 20th.

Please SIGN this petition and DEMAND that state legislators, in every state, PLEDGE to defend America from the tyranny of the Left.

January 6th, 2021 will be remembered by patriotic Americans, for generations to come, as a turning point.

January 6th will be remembered as conservative America's vote of no confidence in official institutions. Simultaneously a primordial cry for freedom and a tragic scene where the last vestiges of law and order succumbed under the reality of current events.

(After you have signed this petition, take a couple of minutes to personally contact your state legislators by email, Twitter, or by phone, using the Voter Voice tool provided to you by LifeSite. With one click of a button, you can contact them without having to look up any contact details yourself!)

Don't be mistaken: unlike so many politicians who are supposed to be on our side, the left almost always follows through with what they set out to do. So, yes, you can believe all of the predictions of impending doom for conservative causes.

Therefore, we must now DEMAND that our state legislators ACT to defend us from the federal government's future attempts to attack our freedoms, human life, the natural family, and our right to freely practise our faith.

And we, ourselves, must also be willing to strongly advocate for those freedoms, for life, for family and for our Faith.

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition. And then, please take 5 minutes to contact your local state representatives using the Voter Voice link below. With Voter Voice, it really couldn't be easier.

Thank you!

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

After signing the petition, CONTACT YOUR STATE REPS HEREhttps://www.votervoice.net/LifesiteNews/campaigns/79129/respond

'LifeSite VP: I was in DC today. Here’s what I saw, and what I think about it.' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/lifesite-vp-i-was-in-dc-today-heres-what-i-saw-and-what-i-think-about-it

'BREAKING: Facebook, Instagram ban Trump ‘indefinitely,’ as digital purge begins' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-facebook-instagram-ban-trump-indefinitely-as-digital-purge-begins

  Hide Petition Text

The plaintiffs assert additional constitutional problems with the RHA.

It permits the killing of viable fetuses for any reason up to 24 weeks of pregnancy, or at any time thereafter when a healthcare practitioner considers the abortion necessary to protect a woman’s life or “health.” The term “health” is not defined. It has been interpreted, however, to include all factors — physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman's age — relevant to the well-being of the patient. To the extent the RHA permits post-viable terminations based on factors other than a substantial threat to the mother’s health, the plaintiffs charge, it violates existing but unrecognized rights of viable unborn children.

“Viable unborn children are the last remaining category of human beings denied human rights,” Civiletto points out. “It’s time to change that.”

The plaintiffs also challenge the ambiguity associated with the term “healthcare practitioner.”

“These vague terms in New York’s Reproductive Health Act leave women and their babies unprotected in dangerous ways,” explains Collett. “The law now allows almost ‘any healthcare practitioner’ to perform abortions, including surgical third trimester abortions. Who is a ‘healthcare practitioner’?” continues Collett. “The language of the RHA provides little guidance beyond a reference to ‘scope of practice,’ which simply does not answer the question.”

“There are numerous cases where women have died or been injured during abortions performed by unqualified and untrained clinic staff,” states Catherine Glenn Foster, a leading human rights attorney and counsel to the Women’s Alliance Against Violence. She adds, “National studies of abortion facility conditions reveal hundreds of significant violations of state laws regulating abortion facilities, with many reports of abortions performed by people with almost no medical training.”

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.