News
Featured Image
 Shutterstock.com

SALEM, Oregon, June 20, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) – Oregon Right to Life (ORTL) declared victory Tuesday because a bill allowing dementia and mentally ill patients to be starved to death was sent to a House committee that's already closed for the legislative session, effectively killing the anti-life bill.

Senate Bill 494 was written in such an insidious way, said Gayle Atteberry, ORTL's executive director, that its text can be difficult for lay people to understand. She called it the most “devious bill” she'd ever seen.

The bill would have removed safeguards preventing dementia and mentally ill patients from being starved or dehydrated against their will. It passed the Oregon Senate 17-13 on June 8

Lois Anderson, Director of Political Operations at ORTL and its incoming executive director, announced the demise of the bill in a Facebook live video with ORTL Communications Director Liberty Pike.

It's hard to believe that legislation would “actually” allow “patients who are conscious, not dying” to be so mistreated, said Anderson, but that's what Bill 494 would have done. The bill “came to the House and it was referred to a committee that's already closed,” she explained. “And so that means that it can't move anywhere this session and basically, the bill is dead.”

Pike said this is a “huge victory.”

Anderson thanked “everyone, both in Oregon and around the country who emailed and phoned, sometimes repeatedly,” state legislators. She also thanked the pro-life legislators who opposed the bill.

“If they ever try to bring this bill back in the future, we will be there to fight it tooth and nail again,” promised Pike. 

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.