Featured Image
Elizabeth GuzmanScreenshot/Facebook

RICHMOND, Virginia (LifeSiteNews) — A leftist Virginia delegate has backed down on her plans to reintroduce a bill that could lead to police investigations of parents for not “affirming” their children’s homosexual or gender dysphoric inclinations.

Delegate Elizabeth Guzman will no longer introduce her legislation to send police or child protective services after parents, in the face of backlash. She said her legislation has been misrepresented.

“The 2020 bill was a child safety bill that would have simply protected children from ‘physical or mental injury on the basis of the child’s gender identity or sexual orientation,’ ” Guzman tweeted. “The way the bill was presented in the article was patently wrong.”

House Minority Leader Don Scott said the legislation would be “dead on arrival,” according to the Washington Post.

Governor Glenn Youngkin’s team said in a statement to media that “the goal of Democrat lawmakers in Virginia is to criminalize parents who are trying to be involved in their children’s lives. Children belong to families not to the state and Virginians can count on Governor Youngkin to continue empowering parents in the Commonwealth.”

Guzman said she planned to reintroduce the legislation specifically to counteract Governor Glenn Youngkin’s new policies which state that schools cannot “transition” kids without their parent’s knowledge and consent.

READ: Vermont high school girls rebuke district for forcing them to share locker room with gender-confused male

— Article continues below Petition —
Protect Girls from Sharing Locker Rooms with Boys — Reject New Title IX Expansions
  Show Petition Text
1944 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 2500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The Biden Administration has proposed a series of expansions to Title IX for all school districts — including “protection” for transgender students — attempting to "make clear that preventing someone from participating in school programs and activities consistent with their gender identity would cause harm in violation of Title IX.” 

School districts across America would force girls to share locker room with boys, changing and showering in the same areas, rooming together when traveling, and more — all if a boy says he’s a girl.  

*** Transgender accommodations are an alarming affront against the dignity and safety of girls and cannot be tolerated or implemented in America’s school districts. *** 

The dangers facing young girls are unimaginable. SEND A MESSAGE NOW to your State Board of Education: protect our girls and stop this insanity!

Florida’s state Department of Education is already sending memos across the Sunshine State, reminding school districts, private schools, charters, and more that they are not required to comply with the federal mandates — for now.  

Demand that every State Board of Education follow Florida's lead!

The proposed Title IX expansions are litmus tests to leftwing loyalty, meaning that leftwing school districts and states will be quick to attempt enforcement of these new “civil liberties” on their school children.  

The federal government will sure to add pressure on conservative districts like those in Florida — pressuring them to bow to the new ‘woke’ sexualized ideology of the left. 


The Hill has already begun running attacks against Florida’s conservative politics, stating that “Florida is not known for its LGBTQ+ allyship.”  

Propaganda pieces masquerading as news will only increase, pressuring lawmakers and school districts to bow to the leftwing premise that men can become women. We cannot allow this anti-science position to grip America’s school districts — endangering our nation's young girls. 

*** This federal attempt to change the meaning of sexual difference is an affront to each state's liberties — a danger to girls everywhere — and it must end now! *** 


Just last year, male prisoners pretended to be female in order to secure transfers to female-only prisons. This is a clear “gaming of the system” that anyone with common sense clearly sees.  

Now more than ever, Americans must raise a consistent and unwavering voice that science and truth in Title IX matters and must not be changed. The future — and safety — of our girls depends on separate sports, showers, dorms, and other spaces reserved for sexual difference.  

“LGBTQ+ allyship” means ruining sexual difference and eliminating the safety of female students because a boy claims to be a girl. We must stand firmly against this gender confusion.  

The federal government continues to experiment with our children, but by adding your name to this message, we can push back with one powerful voice that our school districts must follow the science and protect female integrity! 

Demand your State Board of Education follow the science: boys cannot become girls! SIGN NOW!



Florida DOE blasted by The Hill for not being an “LGBTQ ally”

Male cheerleader chokes teammate after pretending to be a girl

22 sue the Biden Admin for tying school lunch money to transgender bathrooms

Prisoners request transfer to female prisons after claiming they're women


Photo: Wikimedia, sarahmirk. remixed

  Hide Petition Text

READ: GOP candidate slams opponent’s agenda of sexualization, gender manipulation in schools

Her reference to an “article” refers to an October 13 story by WJLA where Guzman clearly stated she would use police resources and social workers to go after parents who did not support their LGBT child’s decision.

“If the child shares with those mandated reporters, what they are going through, we are talking about not only physical abuse or mental abuse, what the job of that mandated reporter is to inform Child Protective Services (CPS),” Guzman told the ABC affiliate. “And then that’s how everybody gets involved. There’s also an investigation in place that is not only from a social worker but there’s also a police investigation before we make the decision that there is going to be a CPS charge.”

The 7News reported that Nick Minock asked Guzman specifically what the penalties would be “if the investigation concludes that a parent is not affirming of their LGBTQ child.”

“Well, we first have to complete an investigation,” Guzman said in her response. “It could be a felony, it could be a misdemeanor, but we know that CPS charge could harm your employment, could harm their education, because nowadays many people do a CPS database search before offering employment.”

Guzman said in a tweet thread that her record had been “distorted.”

But WJLA posted the full interview where Guzman, who repeatedly refers to her work as a social worker, notes that she is not an “attorney” when asked for clarification on what “affirmation” means in her own legislation. Furthermore, LGBT activists have repeatedly cited mental health as a reason to chemically and genitally mutilate children and use their “preferred pronouns.”

“How do you define affirmation, in terms of, the scope of the bill,” Minock asked

“I’m not an attorney,” Guzman said. But she shared that her “goal” is to “help children, accept them for who they are.”

Minock then specifically asked about Catholic or Muslim parents who don’t support LGBT ideology and how her legislation could infringe on the First Amendment.

Guzman said she has been asked that before and as a “religious person” she “goes by what the Bible says” and that means to “love everyone” and that it is no one’s job to “judge” people.

Guzman’s office did not respond to a request for comment on her legislation and a copy of the bill on October 14. LifeSiteNews specifically asked about prison time for parents who don’t support their children’s embrace of LGBT inclinations.

The Family Foundation of Virginia criticized the bill in a statement to LifeSiteNews.

“It is abundantly clear that the ideological Left and radical LBGTQ groups are scheming together to find ways to demonize and punish loving parents, with the intent of driving wedges between them and their children,” President Virginia Cobb told LifeSiteNews. “We saw a version of this bill in 2020, and the purpose is to force parents to abdicate their role to nurture and guide their children through life, and submit to a child’s view or the state’s view of sex and sexuality regardless of the lifelong harms it poses to the child.”

Cobb said the bill is “offensive” and “weakens the role of parents and conflicts with the core biblical principle that family is the basic unit and building block of the society.”