Featured Image

RICHMOND, Virginia (LifeSiteNews) — Virginia Republican Delegate Nick Freitas recently gave a powerful speech criticizing Planned Parenthood’s opposition to his born alive bill.

Freitas’ legislation would require medical professionals to take all reasonable steps to save the life of an aborted infant born alive. He said the bill was personal to him because people had told his mom to abort him.

“It was a bill that said that if the child survives it, they’re entitled to basic reasonable care to try to protect their life,” Freitas said on the floor of the House of Delegates on Tuesday. But Planned Parenthood opposed the bill in the Virginia senate rules committee. A majority of senators voted to effectively kill the bill by tabling it “indefinitely.”

A witness, Robin Sertell, shared how she survived three saline abortion attempts.

“Right after she shared this, Planned Parenthood got up and said that this bill was a solution in search of a problem. They said my bill was full of hateful rhetoric, [and] that [it] was designed to stigmatize people,” he said.

He said Planned Parenthood’s comments reminded him of what his father, a homicide detective, had told him when Freitas asked how people could kill one another: “You will be shocked at the justification that is used by people in order to commit certain acts.”

“Nick, the worst part is not when you’re shocked, it’s when you stop being shocked,” his father told him later, after the delegate shared stories about what he had seen as a Special Forces member in Iraq.

He said these comments made more sense to him after Planned Parenthood’s lobbyist made her statement against the legislation.

“When Planned Parenthood did that right after a victim testified, I wasn’t shocked at all, I wasn’t shocked when the bill died,” he said. “I wasn’t shocked, when [we] couldn’t get a single colleague on the other side of the aisle to vote for it.”

“The question is will the bill be back? Yes … it will for as long as I’m here or anybody else, it will come back and the reason why is very simple, because my father also taught me something else,” he said. “[W]hen the innocent are in peril, the strong have an obligation and a duty to stand up and defend them, even if they’re the only ones to do it.”

“When we are talking about the Born Alive Act, a child born alive being entitled to certain medical care, this is a basic test of humanity,” the delegate said.

“And before I listen to one more lecture about the least of these among us, about the poor, about the marginalized in society,” he said, “I would like to think that we can at least agree that in a situation like this we’re going to stand up and ensure that this child gets a basic level of care.”

Virginia Democrats in recent years have staked out a position in support of legalized infanticide.

Former Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam infamously said that there should be a “discussion” about what happens when a baby survives an abortion.

“The infant would be delivered; the infant would be kept comfortable; the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desire,” the former pediatrician said in January 2019. “Then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”

His comments came after Del. Kathy Tran said a bill she wrote and sponsored to eliminate all abortion restrictions could be interpreted to mean that a woman could have an abortion a moment before birth.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.