News
Featured Image
Washington Post websiteShutterstock

Big Tech is censoring us. Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news.  Subscribe now.

January 19, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – In an op-ed for the Washington Post, associate professor of social and cultural analysis at New York University, Christina Beltrán, writes that Hispanic and black Trump voters support “the politics of aggression, exclusion and domination” in a “phenomenon” she calls “multiracial whiteness.”

Beltrán, who describes herself as “Latinx,” which is touted as the gender-neutral term for being of Latin American origin, opens her opinion piece by claiming that Trump voters are “anti-immigration, anti-civil rights.” According to the author, this has “made it easy to classify the president’s loyalists as a homogenous mob of white nationalists.”

However, she is then forced to admit that there is no such homogeneity in Trump’s support. Speaking of the vast number of people who turned up in the nation’s capital for the “Stop the Steal” rally on January 6, Beltrán notes that amid “the many White faces are a few that are clearly Latino or African American.”

“Such diversity”, she says, corresponds to Trump’s increased share of the Latino vote from the 2016 presidential campaign, “notwithstanding years of incendiary rhetoric targeting Mexicans and other Latino communities.” Beltrán admits her concern that “a quarter to a third of Latino voters voted to reelect Trump.”

In addition to the “unsettling exit-poll data,” Beltrán observes that “many Black and brown voters have family and friends who fervently backed the MAGA policy agenda.” Examples of such people include “Ali Alexander, a Trump supporter who identifies as Black and Arab” and is “[o]ne of the organizers of the ‘Stop the Steal’ movement.” She also makes mention of Enrique Tarrio, whom she describes as “chairman of the neo-fascist Proud Boys,” and as “a Latino raised in Miami’s Little Havana who identifies as Afro-Cuban.”

Given Beltrán’s incredulity that black and Latino voters could ever support Trump’s “white supremacist” agenda, she seeks to rationalize the uptick in ethnic minority support for the president in another way, asking, “[W]hat are we to make of unmistakably White mob violence that also includes non-White participants?”

The answer is “multiracial whiteness.” Explaining the “phenomenon,” Beltrán says “multiracial whiteness is an ideology invested in the unequal distribution of land, wealth, power and privilege — a form of hierarchy in which the standing of one section of the population is premised on the debasement of others.”

This ideology, she writes, is “[r]ooted in America’s ugly history of white supremacy, indigenous dispossession and anti-blackness.” But rather than simply call such an ideology racist or classist, Beltrán calls it “whiteness,” equating the racial condition of being white with the evil of racism.

According to Beltrán, “whiteness” is “a political color and not simply a racial identity.” This, she explains, makes white “a discriminatory worldview in which feelings of freedom and belonging are produced through the persecution and dehumanization of others.”

“Multiracial whiteness offers citizens of every background the freedom to call Muslims terrorists, demand that undocumented immigrants be rounded up and deported, deride BLM as a movement of thugs and criminals, and accuse Democrats of being blood-drinking pedophiles,” Beltrán continues.

She encourages readers to think “in terms of multiracial whiteness” as a way to understand the true political divide of our day: “[T]hose who are drawn to and remain invested in a politics of whiteness and those who seek something better.”

But with Trump’s presidency drawing to a close, Beltrán sees an opportunity to make black people black again, and stop them from trying to be self-hating white people: “In the post-Trump era, the challenge will be to prevail over the extremism of Trump’s White majority while trying to prevent the politics of whiteness from becoming an increasingly multiracial affair.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Urge the U.S. Attorney General to investigate the Black Lives Matter organization
  Show Petition Text
14323 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 15000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Violence has erupted on American streets.

Of course, this is not surprising given the violent rhetoric employed by Democratic politicians and liberal media personalities over the past four years. [See the link, below]

But now, not even U.S. Senators are immune from being violently accosted and detained against their will, as were Sen. Rand Paul and his wife, just late last week in Washington, D.C.

It is believed that many people engaging in violent behavior have been organized and financially supported to inflict as much mayhem as possible to further the 'cause' of a Leftist revolution in the United States.

This petition calls for the U.S. Attorney General, William Barr, and his Justice Department to launch an investigation into these violent disturbances - and, in particular, to investigate who has been funding the instigators.

This petition also calls for particular attention to be given to the Black Lives Matter Global Network organization which has been calling for revolution on the home page of its website, and which is running a petition to defund the police.

Calling for revolution and running a petition to defund the police, while at the same time refusing to condemn the violence against innocent citizens by self-professed BLM activists, is at best highly irresponsible, and at worst, criminal behavior.

It is known that the organization has received donations from the secretive Tides Foundation as well as from George Soros' Open Society Foundations, both of which are less-than-transparent funders of far-left causes.

And, it is also known that Black Lives Matter movement organizations, of which the Black Lives Matter Global Network is the self-styled head, have raked in over $1 Billion dollars in corporate giving.

It is, therefore, very likely that corporations are directly, if unwittingly, paying to mobilize and support the people who are destroying American cities during these violent protests.

And, the fact that the Black Lives Matter organization operates a decentralized network of chapters begs the question as to what kind of activities the chapters sponsor with any funding they receive from their organization's central office.

Investigations need to be launched quickly.

Starting with those who are inciting the violence, here is what Senator Paul said needs to happen to get to the bottom of this:

"They all need to be arrested, and I'm not saying forever, but they need to be arrested, questioned, they need to say where you're staying, and the bills need to be subpoenaed by a judge, to say 'who paid for your bill, how did you get here on a plane and staying in a fancy hotel, and yet you're acting like a criminal.' Something's going on here and it's much bigger than people think."

Senator Paul is right, and the Justice Department needs to act now.

Please SIGN this petition which calls on U.S. Attorney General, William Barr, to launch inquiries into the violent unrest which has seized some American cities, and, in particular, focus on what, if any, role the Black Lives Matter organization has played in inciting this turmoil.

Thank you!

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'‘Not normal’: US senator lays out dangerous connections linking US-wide mob action' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/not-normal-us-senator-lays-out-dangerous-connections-linking-us-wide-mob-action

'Republican congressman echoes Rand Paul’s call for DOJ probe into funding of riots' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/republican-congressman-echoes-rand-pauls-call-for-doj-probe-into-funding-of-riots

'Black Lives Matter groups are multiplying — and competing for donations' - https://nypost.com/2020/08/15/blm-groups-are-multiplying-and-competing-for-donations/

YouTube video showing clips of Democratic politicians and liberal celebrities inciting unrest, and, in some cases, violence - https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=0&v=7yYplnEkbqU&feature=emb_logo

'Catholic civil rights group: Black Lives Matter endangers blacks' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/catholic-civil-rights-group-black-lives-matter-endangers-blacks

Black Lives Matter video which says that they "continue the tradition of revolution" - https://blacklivesmatter.com/now-we-transform/

Tides Foundation webpage describing their partnership with the Black Lives Matter organization - https://www.tides.org/our-community/partnerships/tides-welcomes-black-lives-matter/

Reuters 'Fact Check' admitting Soros' Open Society Foundations contributed to the Black Lives Matter organization - https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-false-george-soros-claims/fact-checkfalseclaims-about-george-soros-idUSKBN23P2XJ

**Photo by Alex Wong / Getty Images

  Hide Petition Text

Beltrán’s has received backlash for her op-ed among many observers.

Conservative podcast host Matt Walsh of The Daily Wire sees the term as an embarrassing sort of oxymoron: “[M]ultiracial whiteness, which is, I imagine, quite similar to beautiful ugliness, hot coldness, wealthy poverty; similar in the sense that these are all non-sequiturs.”

Ben Domenech tweeted an acid response to the article, accusing Beltrán of “struggling with the fact that some of the people who disagree with you are brown.”

Comedian Andrew Doyle weighed in through his parody Twitter personality, Titania McGrath, satirizing Beltrán’s work in his typical, “privileged victimhood” style:

Beltrán’s op-ed on whiteness being a “political color” may have inadvertently given context to Joe Biden’s gaffe of May last year. In an interview with “Charlamagne Tha God” on “The Breakfast Club,” Biden declared that “if you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black.”

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.