News
Featured Image
West Virginia State Capitol building.Sean Pavone/Shutterstock

You’re invited! Join LifeSite in celebrating 25 years of pro-life and pro-family reporting at our anniversary Gala August 17th in Naples, Florida. Tickets and sponsorships can be purchased by clicking here. 

CHARLESTON, West Virginia (LifeSiteNews) — A bill to clarify West Virginia’s pre-Roe abortion ban would actually expand the state’s abortion access and deny protections for the unborn, Republican lawmakers warn.

West Virginia lawmakers introduced HB 302 last week in a bid to update the state’s 173-year-old pro-life law that made abortion a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison.

Republican Gov. Jim Justice called a special legislative session on July 25 “[t]o clarify and modernize the abortion-related laws currently existing as part of the West Virginia Code.”

On Friday, however, after a week of intense debate, the Senate voted 21-10 to send the heavily-amended bill back to the House of Delegates, which had passed an earlier version Wednesday. The House rejected the Senate’s changes to the bill, leading lawmakers to reach a stalemate Friday night and ultimately decide to adjourn until an unnamed later date. The House has also called for a conference committee to iron out disagreements.

West Virginia Republican Sen. Patricia Rucker, a Catholic homeschooling mom of five, told LifeSiteNews in a phone interview Monday that the “intention of the legislature” had been to “clarify a few things about our current law, which is a total prohibition on abortion in the state of West Virginia except for when the mother’s life is in danger.”

West Virginia’s 1849 abortion ban, which pre-dates even West Virginia’s statehood, became a dead letter after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to federally protect abortion as a “constitutional right” in Roe v. Wade (1973).

— Article continues below Petition —
DEFEND Mothers and Babies Against Powerful CEOs Paying Female Employees to Abort!
  Show Petition Text
5136 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 6000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

30+ powerful big-box, Big Tech, and mainstream media companies are targeting their young female employees by offering abortion travel “benefits” to new mothers — to kill their children for the sake of corporate profit and productivity! 

THIS PRO-DEATH CORPORATE CULTURE WILL DESTROY LIVES AND VILLIFY BIG FAMILIES AND PRO-LIFE VALUES IF WE DON’T ACT NOW!  

***WE CANNOT LOSE THE PRO-LIFE VICTORY AFTER ROE V. WADE TO ANTI-FAMILY COMPANIES! SEND A MESSAGE TO POWERFUL CEOs TODAY THAT YOU SUPPORT OUR CHILDREN’S RIGHTS OF LIFE, LIBERTY, AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS!*** 

SIGN THE PETITION NOW TO WIN THE CORPORATE PRO-LIFE BATTLE! 

The pro-life movement has a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to send a pro-family message to millions of citizens for generations to come — but we cannot LOSE OUT on this moment by caving to corporations and their cheap and disgusting “abortion” benefits! 

CONSUMERS MUST SEND A RESOUNDING MESSAGE TO ALL CORPORATE LEADERS THAT WE WILL NOT TOLERATE EMPLOYEE ABORTION PRESSURE! 

SIGN TODAY and demand the following company CEOs SUPPORT WOMEN AND CHILDREN NOW! 

***WE ARE DELIVERING THIS LETTER TO EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEM!*** 

Jeff Bezos – Amazon 

 

Brian Moynihan – Bank of America 

 

Whitney Wolfe Herd – Bumble 

 

BuzzFeed – Jonah Peretti 

 

Cigna Health Insurance – David Cordani 

 

 

Citigroup – Jane Fraser 

 

CNN – Chris Licht 

 

Comcast – Brian Roberts 

 

Condé Nast – Roger Lynch 

 

CVS Health – Karen Lynch 

Dick’s Sporting Goods – Lauren Hobart 

 

Goldman Sachs – David Solomon 

 

Hewlett-Packard – Enrique Lores 

 

JPMorgan Chase – Jamie Dimon 

 

Kroger – Rodney McMullen 

 

New York Times – Meredith Kopit Levien 

 

Lyft – Logan Green 

 

MasterCard – Michael Miebach 

 

Meta/Facebook - Mark Zuckerberg 

 

Microsoft – Satya Nadella 

 

Paramount – Brian Robbins 

 

Patagonia – Jenna Johnson 

 

PayPal – Dan Schulman 

 

Procter & Gamble – Jon Moeller 

 

Salesforce – Marc Benioff 

 

Starbucks – Kevin Johnson 

 

Target – Brian Cornell 

 

Tesla, Inc. – Elon Musk 

 

Uber – Dara Khosrowshahi  

 

Vox Media – Jim Bankoff 

 

Disney – Bob Chapek 

 

Yelp – Jeremy Stoppelman 

 

Zillow – Rich Barton 

 

*** SIGN NOW AND MAKE YOUR PRO-LIFE AND PRO-FAMILY VOICE HEARD AT THE WORLD'S LARGEST CORPORATIONS! TELL THESE CEOs TO STOP SUPPORTING ABORTION TODAY! *** 

_____ 

Image Logos: Wikipedia 

  Hide Petition Text

The state’s old law was reactivated after the Supreme Court overturned Roe in June. Last month, however, a circuit judge blocked the measure, declaring it would be “inequitable” to allow the old law to be enforced until it is amended.

READ: Judge blocks West Virginia’s 1849 abortion ban from taking effect

Sen. Rucker told LifeSite that lawmakers had planned to clarify elements of the law, including ensuring that criminal prosecution for abortion would apply to abortionists but not to mothers.

However, she said that’s not how the bill turned out.

A bevy of amendments from both the House of Delegates and the Senate have not only rendered the bill’s pro-life protections largely toothless, but broadened legal protections for abortion access by authorizing exceptions and failing to implement a coherent verification mechanism.

Amendments included the House’s Wednesday addition of exceptions in cases of rape or incest, along with the Senate’s Friday removal of criminal penalties for medical providers who conduct abortions.

Rucker said the amended bill would also allow “the reporting mechanism” regarding cases of rape or incest “to be so loose” that abortion-seeking women who claim to have been raped wouldn’t need to provide proof that they reported that rape to police.

“To me, all that does is protect the rapist,” Rucker said.

According to Rucker, what began as an effort to merely update a pre-Civil War law has instead “created so many loopholes” that it would actually serve to expand access to legal abortion at the state’s last remaining abortion facility.

RELATED: Group to build pro-life park across from West Virginia’s last abortion mill

Sen. Rucker said she will not vote for the legislation as it stands, explaining, “I must follow my conscience and do what I can to protect babies.”

West Virginia Republican Sen. Robert Karnes also told LifeSite in a phone interview Monday that he also will not support the legislation in its current form.

Karnes argued that by adding exceptions and failing to ensure that claims of rape or incest are verified, the legislation has become pro-abortion, not pro-life.

“It’s been watered down so much I really don’t think you can call it a pro-life bill,” he said.

Sen. Karnes told LifeSite that at this stage it’s unlikely a more robust bill will emerge in the legislature, since “the votes aren’t going to change.”

However, he expressed optimism in future legislative efforts after the 2022 midterms, predicting a substantial increase in conservative lawmakers.

“After November, we’ll be in a much better position,” he said.

Karnes also pointed out that it’s possible the West Virginia Supreme Court could remove the temporary injunction on the state’s 1849 abortion ban, making additional legislative efforts less urgent.

Meanwhile, Sen. Rucker told LifeSite she doesn’t have a clear idea whether or not the bill as it stands will ultimately become law. CNN noted it’s currently in a state of “legislative limbo” as the House and Senate clash over the measure’s details.

“I don’t know whether there’s going to be enough legislators who have the courage and fortitude to admit that this law can be fixed and are willing to start over again,” Sen. Rucker told LifeSite. “I can only hope.”

Noting that West Virginia “is very pro-life,” Rucker said she hopes voters “do their due diligence” in the midterms, ensuring they vote for authentically pro-life candidates who will fight for real legal protections for the unborn.

Build a memorial park for the unborn in West Virginia: LifeFunder

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

0 Comments

    Loading...