Steve Jalsevac Steve Jalsevac Follow Steve

Most threatening year ever!

Steve Jalsevac Steve Jalsevac Follow Steve
By Steve Jalsevac

Today we launch our annual Christmas Campaign with a goal of $150,000 this year.  We realize this seems ambitious, but we are in great need from the many demanding events of this past year. As well, this is the time to raise funds required to keep LifeSiteNews going during the lean early winter months. We appeal for your help to spread our unique pro-life, pro-family, ‘big picture’ news stories around the world.

The past year has been quite an adventure for LifeSiteNews. Since we have not backed down from our mission to boldly report on behalf of life and family issues, our service is under increasing attack from those who want to silence the Truth. This year has been no exception, if not the most threatening of all!

2011 in review:

Last February we announced the shocking news that a lawsuit for $500,000 had been filed against LifeSiteNews and some of its named staff by Fr. Raymond Gravel, a ‘pro-choice’ Catholic priest in Quebec. Just this past week, our editor-in-chief John-Henry Westen traveled to Quebec for a discovery hearing regarding the case.

Our written defense will finally be submitted before Christmas and the trial, now involving a team of three lawyers acting on our behalf, will begin in either 2012 or 2013. We will report much more on the case at a later date when we are free to do so.

Our Summer and Fall campaigns began uncharacteristically slow this year causing real concern that LifeSiteNews would not have the funds necessary to continue our current level of operations. Although our goals were unfortunately not met for either campaign, the response ended up being adequate to at least maintain our services.

As the Development and Peace controversy continues in Canada,  the Catholic ‘social justice’ organization’s members were encouraged to “Occupy LifeSite” by flooding the comments section of news coverage of LifeSiteNews with nasty attacks and distortions about our news service and its reports.

Not only have the enemies of life attempted to silence the message of truth, but we have also witnessed unprecedented threats to the basic freedoms that allow us to spread this message of Truth!

One of our writer/translators, Julio Severo, had his much needed PayPal account privileges removed following complaints to PayPal from a gay-activist group that his pro-family message is hate speech! Severo was told by Paypal that the significant funds in the account at the time would not be released to him for 9 months!

However, all these things mean that we have been having an impact.

Those who oppose the Culture of Life are increasingly seeing LifeSiteNews to be a threat to their agendas. We don’t intend to be a threat to anyone, but we do believe in the great power of truth and the need for that truth.

This past year has also been filled with other more explicitly encouraging events as a result of the work you have helped us to accomplish:

In the time of greatest need in LifeSiteNews history, you made the difference! The outpouring of support we received in response to our announcement of the lawsuit was very encouraging. Though we still have a long way to go to win this battle, your support kept us moving forward with our mission.

Following updates and a fresh look, our website is on track to reach well over 12 million pageviews this year! We have also seen 500,000 unique visitors per month for the past 3 months straight! Our various Facebook pages have accumulated nearly 50,000 “fans” or “likes.”

LifeSiteNews has been incredibly successful this past year in providing pro-life leaders in Latin America with crucial research and information in their battle for life and family.  Our speaking presentations at various events in the Mexico, Brazil, the US and Canada have been so well received that there have been more subsequent conference invitations than we have been able to accept!

As we here at LifeSiteNews reflect on this past year, we are exceptionally grateful for your support which has brought great success in the battle for life and family and has been a source of continual inspiration during the worst assaults.

One struggle that is always with us is obtaining a regular flow of financial resources to keep up our current level of reporting and activities.

In addition, though, no Internet service can maintain a healthy momentum unless it continually improves and keeps up with the latest Internet publishing trends and technologies. For that we need more funds than just an amount to cover our most basic operating costs.

During this Christmas Campaign - our largest and most important of the year - I hope you can be extra generous.

Steve Jalsevac
Managing Director

U.S. and International Donors
Click here to donate online.

Call our office at (888) 678-6008 x. 923 between 9:00 a.m. and 5 p.m. EST.

To donate by mail, print out and fill in one of our Adobe Acrobat PDF format mail-in forms (Click here). Then mail it with your check, money order, or credit card information to the address below. Please note that you can set up an automatic recurring donation using your bank account or credit card by indicating your intention to do so on the check or mail-in form., Inc.
4 Family Life Lane
Front Royal, VA 22630

Canadian donors Click here to donate online.

Call our office at (888) 678-6008 x. 923 between 9:00 a.m. and 5 p.m. EST.

To donate by mail, print out and fill in one of our Adobe Acrobat PDF format mail-in forms (Click here). Then mail it with your check, money order, or credit card information to the address below. Please note that you can set up an automatic recurring donation using your bank account or credit card by indicating your intention to do so on the check or mail-in form.
104 Bond St.
Toronto, ON
M5B 1X9

*If the donation is towards a certain promotion or campaign, (i.e. Christmas Campaign 2011) please indicate this on the mail-in form and check.

Share this article

Steve Jalsevac Steve Jalsevac Follow Steve

Today’s chuckle: Rubio, Fiorina and Carson pardon a Thanksgiving turkey

Steve Jalsevac Steve Jalsevac Follow Steve
By Steve Jalsevac

A little bit of humour now and then is a good thing.

Happy Thanksgiving to all our American readers.

Share this article

Featured Image
Building of the European Court of Human Rights.
Lianne Laurence


BREAKING: Europe’s top human rights court slaps down German ban on pro-life leafletting

Lianne Laurence
By Lianne Laurence

STRASBOURG, France, November 26, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) – The European Court of Human Rights ruled Thursday that a German regional court violated a pro-life activist’s freedom of expression when it barred him from leafleting in front of an abortion center.

It further ruled the German court’s order that Klaus Gunter Annen not list the names of two abortion doctors on his website likewise violated the 64-year-old pro-life advocate’s right to freedom of expression.

The court’s November 26 decision is “a real moral victory,” says Gregor Puppinck, director of the Strasbourg-based European Center for Law and Justice, which intervened in Annen’s case. “It really upholds the freedom of speech for pro-life activists in Europe.”

Annen, a father of two from Weinam, a mid-sized city in the Rhine-Neckar triangle, has appealed to the Strasbourg-based European Court of Human Rights at least two times before, Puppinck told LifeSiteNews.

“This is the first time he made it,” he said, noting that this time around, Annen had support from the ECLJ and Alliance Defense Fund and the German Pro-life Federation (BVL). “I think he got more support, better arguments and so I think this helped.”

The court also ordered the German government to pay Annen costs of 13,696.87 EUR, or 14,530 USD.

Annen started distributing pamphlets outside a German abortion center ten years ago, ECLJ stated in a press release.

His leaflets contained the names and addresses of the two abortionists at the center, declared they were doing “unlawful abortions,” and stated in smaller print that, “the abortions were allowed by the German legislators and were not subject to criminal liability.”

Annen’s leaflets also stated that, “The murder of human beings in Auschwitz was unlawful, but the morally degraded NS State allowed the murder of innocent people and did not make it subject to criminal liability.” They referred to Annen’s website,, which listed a number of abortionists, including the two at the site he was leafleting.

In 2007, a German regional court barred Annen from pamphleteering in the vicinity of the abortion center, and ordered him to drop the name of the two abortion doctors from his website.

But the European Court of Human Rights ruled Thursday that the German courts had "failed to strike a fair balance between [Annen’s] right to freedom of expression and the doctor’s personality rights.”

The Court stated that, “there can be no doubt as to the acute sensitivity of the moral and ethical issues raised by the question of abortion or as to the importance of the public interest at stake.”

That means, stated ECLJ, that “freedom of expression in regard to abortion shall enjoy a full protection.”

ECLJ stated that the court noted Annen’s leaflets “made clear that the abortions performed in the clinic were not subject to criminal liability. Therefore, the statement that ‘unlawful abortions’ were being performed in the clinic was correct from a legal point of view.”

As for the Holocaust reference, the court stated that, “the applicant did not – at least not explicitly – equate abortion with the Holocaust.”  Rather, the reference was “a way of creating awareness of the more general fact that law might diverge from morality.”

The November 26 decision “is a quite good level of protection of freedom of speech for pro-life people,” observed Puppinck.

First, the European Court of Human Rights has permitted leafleting “in the direct proximate vicinity of the clinic, so there is no issue of zoning,” he told LifeSiteNews. “And second, the leaflets were mentioning the names of the doctors, and moreover, were mentioning the issue of the Holocaust, which made them quite strong leaflets.”

“And the court protected that.”

Annen has persevered in his pro-life awareness campaign through the years despite the restraints on his freedom.

“He did continue, and he did adapt,” Puppinck told LifeSiteNews. “He kept his freedom of speech as much as he could, but he continued to be sanctioned by the German authorities, and each time he went to the court of human rights. And this time, he won.”

ECLJ’s statement notes that “any party” has three months to appeal the November 26 decision.

However, as it stands, the European Court of Human Rights’s ruling affects “all the national courts,” noted Puppinck, and these will now “have to protect freedom of speech, recognize the freedom of speech for pro-lifers.”

“In the past, the courts have not always been very supportive of the freedom of speech of pro-life,” he said, so the ruling is “significant.”

As for Annen’s pro-life ministry, Pubbinck added: “He can continue to go and do, and I’m sure that he does, because he always did.”  

Share this article

Featured Image
A vibrant church in Africa. Pierre-Yves Babelon /
Pete Baklinski Pete Baklinski Follow Pete

, ,

‘Soft racism’: German Bishops’ website attributes African Catholics’ strong faith to simplemindedness

Pete Baklinski Pete Baklinski Follow Pete
By Pete Baklinski

GERMANY, November 26, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) --  The only reason the Catholic Church is growing in Africa is because the people have a “rather low level” of education and accept “simple answers to difficult questions” involving marriage and sexuality, posited an article on the official website of the German Bishops' Conference posted yesterday. The article targeted particularly Cardinal Robert Sarah of Guinea, the Vatican's prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and ardent defender of Catholic tradition.

First Things blogger Leroy Huizenga, who translated a portion of the article, criticized the article's view as “soft racism.”

In his article, titled “The Romantic, Poor Church,” editor Björn Odendahl writes: 

So also in Africa. Of course the Church is growing there. It grows because the people are socially dependent and often have nothing else but their faith. It grows because the educational situation there is on average at a rather low level and the people accept simple answers to difficult questions (of faith) [sic]. Answers like those that Cardinal Sarah of Guinea provides. And even the growing number of priests is a result not only of missionary power but also a result of the fact that the priesthood is one of the few possibilities for social security on the dark continent.

Huizenga said that such an article has no place on a bishops’ conference website. 

“We all know that the German Bishops' Conference is one of the most progressive in the world. But it nevertheless beggars belief that such a statement would appear on the Conference's official website, with its lazy slander of African Christians and priests as poor and uneducated (Odendahl might as well have added ‘easy to command’) and its gratuitous swipe at Cardinal Sarah,” he wrote. 

“Natürlich progressives could never be guilty of such a sin and crime, but these words sure do suggest soft racism, the racism of elite white Western paternalism,” he added. 

African prelates have gained a solid reputation for being strong defenders of Catholic sexual morality because of their unwavering orthodox input into the recently concluded Synod on the Family in Rome. 

At one point during the Synod, Cardinal Robert Sarah urged Catholic leaders to recognize as the greatest modern enemies of the family what he called the twin “demonic” “apocalyptic beasts” of “the idolatry of Western freedom” and “Islamic fundamentalism.”

STORY: Cardinal Danneels warns African bishops to avoid ‘triumphalism’

“What Nazi-Fascism and Communism were in the 20th century, Western homosexual and abortion ideologies and Islamic fanaticism are today,” he said during his speech at the Synod last month. 

But African prelates’ adherence to orthodoxy has earned them enemies, especially from the camp of Western prelates bent on forming the Catholic Church in their own image and likeness, not according to Scripture, tradition, and the teaching magisterium of the Church. 

During last year’s Synod, German Cardinal Walter Kasper went as far as stating that the voice of African Catholics in the area of Church teaching on homosexuality should simply be dismissed.

African cardinals “should not tell us too much what we have to do,” he said in an October 2014 interview with ZENIT, adding that African countries are "very different, especially about gays.” 

Earlier this month Belgian Cardinal Godfried Danneels, instead of praising Africa for its vibrant and flourishing Catholicism, said that African prelates will one day have to look to Europe to get what he called “useful tips” on how to deal with “secularization” and “individualism.” 

The statement was criticized by one pro-family advocate as “patronizing of the worst kind” in light of the facts that numerous European churches are practically empty, vocations to the priesthood and religious life are stagnant, and the Catholic faith in Europe, especially in Belgium, is overall in decline.

Share this article


Customize your experience.

Login with Facebook