The Editors

News,

Where’s the money going? A question for Canada’s bishops as they prepare to meet

The Editors
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Sept. 17, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) - In 2010, the Canadian bishops pledged a reform of their aid organization Development & Peace after it was rocked by scandal over its funding of groups in developing nations that advocated legal abortion, contraception and other policies contrary to Catholic teaching. D&P apparently then did an overhaul of its aid recipients’ list, but the list was never made public.

Three quarters of the way into 2012, Canadian Catholics have no idea exactly who their donations have been funding since 2010 and how much has been given to each group.

Canada’s bishops will meet for their annual general assembly in Quebec on Sept. 24-28. As always, D&P will be on the agenda and D&P reps will be attending as usual, with plenty of opportunity to engage the individual bishops. As the bishops prepare for that meeting, we would respectfully ask them to pose just one simple question: Where’s the money going?

Since the pledge of reform in 2010, the aid organization has run two Share Lent campaigns – its major annual fundraiser in Catholic parishes across the country – without releasing the list of its grantees. We are now approaching the third Share Lent campaign.

Click ‘like’ if you want to END ABORTION!

D&P has apparently been so desperate to keep the list a secret that they went to federal court to block an access to information request.

The page of their website listing grantees has stated for well over a year now:

“We are currently finalizing our new 2011-2016 International Program and will be updating our listing of programs and partners. We invite you to visit our website regularly for new information.”

Canadian Catholics are repeatedly asked to support the Church’s official development agency. It only makes sense: the Church’s relief efforts are crucial to her very mission. But in the face of a funding scandal, how can we possibly trust D&P will use the money responsibly, especially when D&P refuses to reveal where it’s going?

If the Canadian bishops’ official international aid group is serious about reform, why haven’t they increased the transparency about their funding relationships?

We’ve been assured that the bishops expect D&P to partner with groups that are not pro-abortion. Archbishop Richard Smith, president of the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, says the bishops “would not have patience for one minute to be supporting any partner that would in any way be pro-abortion.” If all D&P’s grantees are now thoroughly pro-life as Archbishop Smith says they should be, why not publish the names as had been done in previous years? And why not also publish exactly how much is being given to each group?

How else can D&P possibly win back the trust of Catholic donors and assure the bishops and the faithful of their commitment to Catholic teaching?

Sadly, the evidence suggests D&P is withholding the list because they know it would spark another scandal. Just from the sample of grantees they’ve discussed in recent promotional materials, we know D&P is still funding pro-abortion groups.

It could also be that there is an internal struggle still ongoing among the bishops over D&P’s Catholic identity. Note the following on the D&P website:

“We currently work in 30 countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East on the following themes:

  • Empowering women, indigenous groups and other marginalized people;
  • Building democracy;
  • Promoting peace;
  • Local management of natural resources; and
  • Strengthening respect for human and environmental rights.”

From that it seems D&P is still clinging to its failed and very problematic 1960s model of a purely secular-liberal agenda of social and political reform.  That model is totally out of sync with the Catholic evangelization model presented by Pope Benedict in his 2009 encyclical Caritas in Veritate.

Catholics desperately want to get behind the Church’s development efforts. They want to respond generously to their bishops’ repeated calls to support what should be crucial overseas activities – works that Pope Benedict says have ‘openness to life’ at their centre.

So, for devout Catholics, it’s truly sad that they have to ignore pleas from their shepherds to support Development and Peace. Experience has shown that they simply cannot trust D&P with their money, and nothing substantial has been done yet to win back that trust.  In fact, this complete withholding of information about what is being done with their money has made the situation worse than ever.

Catholics should be calling on the bishops, at their upcoming meeting, to demand that D&P release the names and the dollar amounts. If the reform has been authentic, it shouldn’t be a problem. Real transparency is crucially needed at this time.

Parish priests, when the Share Lent collection comes around in five months, may be forced to tell D&P they will withhold the cheques until a complete list is published – one that does not contain even one group that opposes Catholic moral teachings.

And finally the list should also include woefully underfunded pro-life organizations in the developing nations, who are fighting powerful, massively funded population control groups intent on destroying their family-centered and religious cultures. Supporting these pro-life groups is an essential work of true social justice.

No matter what side of this debate you find yourself on, how can one credibly ask people to support an organization that refuses to tell donors where their money goes?



Share this article

Advertisement
Featured Image
Jonathon van Maren Jonathon van Maren Follow Jonathon

Blogs,

Please, enough with the cult of pop stars. Our kids need real heroes.

Jonathon van Maren Jonathon van Maren Follow Jonathon

April 29, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – Two things happen each time a significant pop culture figure dies: Christians attempt to dredge up some moderately conservative or traditional thing that figure said at some point during his long career, and mainstream media attempts to convince a society thoroughly bored with such things that the person in question was a ground-breaking radical. The two most recent examples are the androgynous David Bowie—a cringe-worthy and possibly blasphemous video of him dropping to his knees during a rock performance and uttering the Lord’s Prayer circulated just following his death--and the pop star Prince.

I’ve had to suppress my gag reflexes many times as I saw my Facebook newsfeed fill up with memes sporting quotes from Prince about his faith and articles announcing that the musician who “embraced gender fluidity before his time,” according to Slate and “will always be a gay icon” according to The Atlantic, was against gay marriage. Sure, maybe he was. But only a Christian community so shell-shocked by the rapid spread of the rainbow blitzkrieg and the catastrophic erosion of religious liberty would find this remarkable. After all, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton said the same thing barely one election cycle ago. As one obituary celebrating Prince’s paradigm-smashing sexual performances written by Dodai Stewart put it:

Dig, if you will, a picture: The year is 1980. Many states still have sodomy laws. The radio is playing feel-good ear candy like Captain and Tennille and KC and the Sunshine Band. TV hits include the sunny, toothy blond shows Three’s Company and Happy Days. There’s no real word for “gender non-conforming.” But here’s what you see: A man. Clearly a man. Hairy, mostly naked body…a satiny bikini bottom. But those eyes. Rimmed in black, like a fantasy belly dancer. The full, pouty lips of a pin-up girl. Long hair. A tiny, svelte thing. Ethnically ambiguous, radiating lust. What is this? A man. Clearly a man. No. Not just a man. A Prince.

Right. So let’s not get too carried away, shall we? I know Christians are desperate to justify their addictions to the pop culture trash that did so much to sweep away Christian values in the first place and I know that latching on to the occasional stray conservative belief that may manifest itself in pop culture figures makes many feel as if perhaps we are not so weird and countercultural, but this bad habit we have of claiming these figures upon their passing is downright damaging.

After all, parents should be teaching their children about real heroes, titans of the faith who changed the world. Heroes of the early church who stood down tyrants, halted gladiatorial combat, and crusaded against injustice in a world where death was all the rage. These men and women were real rebels who stood for real values. If we want to point our children to people they should emulate, we should be handing them books like Seven Men: And the Secret of Their Greatness by the brilliant writer Eric Metaxas rather than the pop albums Purple Rain or Lovesexy by Prince. If parents spend their time glorifying the predecessors of Lady Gaga and Miley Cyrus instead of highlighting heroes like William Wilberforce, they can hardly be surprised when their children choose to emulate the former rather than the latter.

The mainstream media’s adulation of these pop stars is equally irritating. The unspoken truth of these obituaries is that the flamboyant antics of Prince and the rest of the so-called rebellious drag queens populating the rock n’ roll scene have been mainstream for a long time already. Want to see dozens of bizarre body piercings? Weird hairdos? Purple mohawks? Dudes with nail polish? Strange tattoos? Easy. Just go onto any university campus, or any public high school without a dress code. With headphones wedged firmly in their ear canals, they can pump the cleverly commercialized “counterculture” straight into their skulls 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

More than that, some of these courageous rebels have actually sued their employers to ensure that they can let their establishment-smashing freak flag fly at work, too. An Edmonton woman with 22 visible body piercings complained that her employer was unfair because apparently she was being discriminated against “based on body modifications.” Yeah! The Man must be told, after all. And if he doesn’t agree, we will lawyer up. I wonder what the shrieking rebels of the early days would think about the snivelling children of the current grievance culture.

So these days, the media’s eulogizing about aging culture warriors who went mainstream a long time ago rings a bit hollow. After all, most rock n’ roll stars these days look tame compared to what shows up in the children’s section at Pride Week. Freaky is normal now. Normal is radical. Welcome to 2016.

When Christians are posting nostalgic tributes to the rebels who helped inoculate their children against the radical views of Christianity in the first place, you know that the victories of the counterculture are complete and Stockholm syndrome has set in.



Share this article

Advertisement
Featured Image
Paul McKinnon / Shutterstock.com
Claire Chretien Claire Chretien

News,

Target boycott climbs to over 1 million

Claire Chretien Claire Chretien

April 29, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – Over 1 million people have signed a pledge to boycott Target over its new policy allowing men to access women’s bathrooms. 

The American Family Association’s Boycott Target petition gained traction immediately, reaching the one million mark in only nine days.

“Corporate America must stop bullying people who disagree with the radical left agenda to remake society into their progressive image,” said AFA President Tim Wildmon. “#BoycottTarget has resonated with Americans.  Target’s harmful policy poses a danger to women and children; nearly everyone has a mother, wife, daughter or friend who is put in jeopardy by this policy.  Predators and voyeurs would take advantage of the policy to prey on those who are vulnerable.  And it’s clear now that over one million customers agree.”

Target defended its policy in a statement saying that it believes everyone “deserves to be protected from discrimination, and treated equally” and earlier this week, a Target spokeswoman defended the policy as “inclusive.” 

The AFA said that unisex bathrooms are a common-sense alternative to allowing men unfettered access to women’s bathrooms.

“Target should keep separate facilities for men and women, but for the trans community and for those who simply like using the bathroom alone, a single occupancy unisex option should be provided,” the petition says. 

The AFA warned that Target’s new policy benefits sexual predators and poses a danger to women and children. 

“With Target publicly boasting that men can enter women's bathrooms, where do you think predators are going to go?” the petition asked. 

There have been numerous instances of predatory men accessing women’s bathrooms and intimate facilities in the wake of “transgender” bathroom policies allowing them to do so. 

“We want to make it very clear that AFA does not believe the transgender community poses this danger to the wider public,” said Wildmon. “Rather, this misguided and reckless policy provides a possible gateway for predators who are out there.”



Share this article

Advertisement
Featured Image
Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben

News,

Amazing new video captures the flash of light the moment life begins

Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben

CHICAGO, April 29, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – Life begins with a spark – literally.

Researchers at Northwestern University have documented the striking event in a new video that accompanies a study published this week.

At the moment of conception, the egg releases massive amounts of zinc, which creates a spark that can be seen with the aid of a microscope.

“It was remarkable,” said Teresa Woodruff, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Northwestern University's medical school. “To see the zinc radiate out in a burst from each human egg was breathtaking.”

The research team had noted the zinc sparks before in mice eggs but had never observed the process in human beings.

“All of biology starts at the time of fertilization,” Woodruff said, “yet we know next to nothing about the events that occur in the human.”

One of the researchers, Northwestern chemistry professor Thomas O'Halloran, explained the science behind the process in 2014.

“The egg first has to stockpile zinc and then must release some of the zinc to successfully navigate maturation, fertilization and the start of embryogenesis,” he said. “On cue, at the time of fertilization, we see the egg release thousands of packages, each dumping a million zinc atoms, and then it's quiet.”

“Each egg has four or five of these periodic sparks,” O'Halloran said. “It is beautiful to see, orchestrated much like a symphony.”

Since the amount of zinc in an egg correlates with successful implantation and birth, the Northwestern researchers are highlighting that their research may be used to assist in vitro fertilization.

But that raises concerns given the grave moral issues with IVF, which involves creating numerous embryos that are either killed or frozen. Moral theologians also emphasize that IVF is an injustice even for the children who are born as a result, as they are created in a lab rather than in the union of man and woman.

The study may have far-reaching consequences the research team did not intend, such as strengthening public belief in the longstanding scientific consensus that life begins at the moment of conception/fertilization.

Many of those who saw the Northwestern video said it testifies to the beauty of life and the shallow lies that buttress the argument of abortion-on-demand.

“I saw this, and I was blown away by it,” said Rush Limbaugh on his nationally syndicated radio program Thursday afternoon. “For anybody in the mainstream media to openly admit that life begins at conception” defies arguments that an unborn child is only “tissue mass.”

Researchers released a separate video of the zinc spark taking place in a mammalian egg more than a year ago:

The paper, which is entitled “The Zinc Spark is an Inorganic Signature of Human Egg Activation,” was published by Scientific Reports on April 26.



Advertisement

Customize your experience.

Login with Facebook