Friday July 30, 2010
Why Rush Limbaugh is Wrong to Support Homosexual Civil Unions
Editorial by John-Henry Westen
July 30, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Speaking on his radio show yesterday, famed conservative talk show personality Rush Limbaugh said that he supports same-sex civil unions. Reacting to critics of musician Elton John, who performed at Limbaugh’s recent wedding, Limbaugh stated: “Elton John is on the same page as I am, as is Obama on gay marriage. He’s for civil unions, but he’s not for marriage.”
Limbaugh’s stance is common among conservatives, but is nonetheless misguided and will inevitably lead to the redefinition of marriage.
The question is not so much about marriage, but about homosexual acts. The acts are harmful to the individuals who engage in them. They are harmful physically, emotionally and spiritually.
Suggesting that one would oppose same-sex ‘marriage’ but support same-sex civil unions sends the wrong message to those engaging in the destructive behavior. Such a compromise undermines the central issue in that it would demonstrate a lack of concern for those participating in homosexual activity.
Moving from tolerance of homosexual activity to legal recognition is a serious matter. Laws teach people what is right and wrong and thus homosexual acts will implicitly be given the stamp of approval where such legal recognition is granted. The young will be given the false impression that this behavior is safe and acceptable, or even good.
Society has a duty to legally recognize and support married couples since they are, through procreation, the source for the continuation of human life and thus society itself. Homosexual couples cannot properly procreate and thus have no such claim to societal recognition.
Then comes the common objection: “But what about IVF? Can’t homosexual couples procreate that way?” IVF is, however, in addition to being destructive of human life with countless human embryos lost in the process, unhealthy for the egg donor and the child conceived. Moreover, it deprives the child the right to be conceived in the loving sexual union of a husband and wife. Most poignantly, it deprives the child of the experience of either fatherhood or motherhood.
In the final analysis, Limbaugh and all conservatives who advocate for homosexual civil unions are themselves dealing the death-knell for the true definition of marriage. Legal recognition of homosexual civil unions will inevitably (and has in many jurisdictions) lead to homosexual ‘marriage.’
The only way to preserve marriage is to confront the struggle at its root – to warn of the dangers of homosexual acts: their dangers to society and to children, but especially to those engaged in such behaviors.
With regard to persons engaged in such behavior or identifying with it, there must never be unjust discrimination. All gay bashing, name-calling and the like should be condemned. However, there must be discrimination on this front, a just discrimination, to preserve societal recognition for marriage between one man and one woman.