Featured Image

SASKATOON, Saskatchewan, July 23, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – A Canadian widow says she has “no doubt” in her mind that a COVID-19 jab is responsible for her husband's death. 

Saskatoon resident Leo van Dam, 64, died on June 12 of a cardiac event, three days after taking a second dose of the Pfizer vaccine.   

His widow Kathryn van Dam told Western Standard earlier this week that Leo had complained of a shooting pain in his back after his first Pfizer inoculation and that she blames the second for his death. 

“I believe that this is from the second vaccination,” Kathryn said. 

“And there’s no doubt in my mind that’s what has happened.” 

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Say 'No' to COVID 'Vaccine Passports'!
  Show Petition Text
217276 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 225000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Powerful nations of the world, including China, the UK, and Canada are discussing plans to require so-called 'vaccine passports' as a condition for travel, and possibly to restrict entry to shopping and entertainment venues.

Israel has already put in place a system to discriminate against those who choose not to take the COVID vaccine, and, in the United States, Joe Biden has signed a new executive order which could pave the way for the implementation of a 'vaccine passport' system. [See more below.]

This kind of medical dictatorship must be resisted, and therefore, we must act quickly before these authoritarian notions take root and spread!

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition to SAY NO to government 'vaccine passports.' Tell your legislators to respect your freedom not to vaccinate without fear of repercussion.

People should not have to live in fear of government retribution for refusing a vaccine which is being rushed to market by Big Pharma and their fellow-travelers in NGOs, like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

It would be intolerable and immoral for the government to coerce someone, and their family, to take a COVID vaccine against their will just so they can do their weekly grocery shopping, go to a high school soccer game, travel on public transport, or visit their relatives who live in a different part of the country, or overseas.

Medical freedom must be respected in principle and also in practice.

So, it is now time that our policy-makers listen to all voices involved in this vital conversation, and start to represent those who will not tolerate being punished, restricted, or tracked for refusing an experimental vaccine.

Simply put, legislatures must begin to act as legislatures again.

Questions must be asked. Hearings and investigations must be held. And, the legislatures of each state and country must return to the business of representing the people who voted for them, assuming their rightful place as the originator of legislation.

We will no longer accept the dictates of executive branches without question. And, neither can we accept the dictates of some doctors who seem detached from reality and from science.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition which asks national political leaders (as well as state and provincial legislators in the U.S. and Canada) to pledge to respect the rights of those who refuse a COVID vaccine, and NOT introduce 'vaccine passports,' or any other system which would discriminate on the basis of taking the COVID vaccine.


'Biden executive order directs government to evaluate ‘feasibility’ of vaccine passports' -

'China lobbies WHO to develop COVID vaccine passports for all nations' -

'UK advances plans for vaccine passports to travel, enter stores' -

'Canada’s health minister: Gov’t ‘working on the idea of vaccine passports’' -

'European Commission president plans to introduce vaccine passports' -

'Israel’s ‘Green Passport’ vaccination program has created a ‘medical Apartheid,’ distraught citizens say' -

'LA schools to track every kid using Microsoft’s ‘Daily Pass’ COVID app' -

  Hide Petition Text

Kathryn had tried to convince her husband to not take his second COVID-19 jab about two weeks before his appointment. However, she said her husband was “adamant,” telling her that the jab was the only way to get the Canadian economy back on course and to return to them their freedom to travel. 

“And he followed mainstream media and fell for it hook, line, and sinker,” Kathryn said.  

She and Leo had been worried he would be at risk for contracting COVID-19 due to him having a heart condition. Leo had suffered a serious heart attack in 2015. 

“We went to great lengths to make sure that we weren’t mixing with anyone. And he said that to me, too, ‘If I get COVID, Kathryn, it's unlikely that I will survive’,” the widow related.  

However, Kathryn herself had reservations about the COVID-19 jab, and the couple had argued about it. Leo had asked her how many people had to get vaccinated before she would believe the vaccines were safe, and she had said the issue wasn’t just about numbers, but also time.  

“We don’t know what the long-term effects of this experimental emergency usage inoculation is,” she told the Western Standard.  

Kathryn would show her husband alternative news, and he would question the sources. Eventually she stopped showing Leo what she was reading, but she continued to voice her doubts in the popular narrative about the vaccines.  

“… I was like, ‘I know that mainstream media is lying to us. Some of these far-fetched conspiracy theories – I don’t believe those either,’” Kathryn recalled.  

“And I thought, ‘The truth is somewhere in the middle of all of this, but I don’t know what the truth is.’” 

Kathryn told both the coroner and the police that her husband had died because of his second COVID-19 jab.  

“When I spoke to the coroner, I asked for an autopsy to be done if … they could determine that it was the vaccination,” she said.  

They said it would be impossible to be able to tell. And so then I said if that’s [true], then there is no point in an autopsy.” 

Kathryn then turned to her family doctor, who spoke to an infectious disease specialist about the possibility that Leo had died of the vaccine. The widow lost faith in the medical profession when she heard the answer. 

But [the specialist] said to [our doctor] that, again, it would be impossible to determine if it had been the vaccination,” she told the Western Standard.  

And he hasn’t heard of any deaths. So when she said they hadn’t heard of any deaths, then I thought, ‘There’s no point in that avenue, they’re all lying.’” 

Health Canada has authorized four COVID-19 injections for adults, all of which are connected to abortion. All of them have also been associated with severe side effects such as blood clots, rashes, miscarriages, and even heart attacks in young healthy men. 

After announcing last year vaccine makers would be shielded from liability regarding COVID-19 jab-related injuries, the Canadian federal government launched the nation’s first-ever program designed to financially compensate those who have suffered adverse side effects from any type of vaccine, the Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP)

According to official Canadian government statistics, as of July 16, there have been a total of 9,615 COVID-19 vaccine-related “adverse events” since the first shots were issued back in late 2020, of which 2,222 were deemed serious. In Canada, 41,526,682 COVID-19 jabs have been administered. 

Despite the number of serious adverse events, the government says, “The benefits of vaccines authorized in Canada continue to outweigh the risks.” 

Last week Canadian doctor Charles Hoffe warned that the worst is yet to come” regarding potential blood clotting effects he said are caused by COVID-19 injections. He stated that he has seen blood clots in most of his patients who have been jabbed. 

According to a report posted on LifeSiteNews by Dr. Joseph Mercola, in June the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) “had posted 358,379 adverse events, including 5,993 deaths and 29,871 serious injuries.”  


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.