News
Featured Image
 Sonia Bonet/Shutterstock

Help Jenny Porter recover from her vaccine injury: LifeFunder

(LifeSiteNews) — The World Health Organization (WHO) has shared a video suggesting that a COVID-19 “vaccine” helped a woman to conceive a child, despite large amounts of data linking the jab to fertility problems. 

On July 27, in order to back up the WHO’s claim that COVID-19 “vaccines” cannot prevent pregnancy, the WHO African Region tweeted a video featuring a Guinea woman who said she became pregnant after receiving the COVID shot.

“Some people think #COVID19 vaccines cause infertility. This is false. ‘Getting vaccinated against #COVID19 cannot prevent a woman from getting pregnant.’ A statement reinforced by the story of Marie Ouendeno in #Guinea,” WHO African Region wrote in their tweet post.

In the video, Ouendeno says, according to the translation captions, “COVID vaccination will not prevent pregnancy, having children, or marriage.”

Ouendeno’s story, however, goes even further than attempting to show that COVID jabs do not hinder conception. It suggests that the jab actually helped her to conceive a child.

“I tried to have a child for five years and after I received the vaccines, I conceived,” shared Ouendeno, before the video cut to footage showing her with her baby boy.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Stop Tedros' WHO Pandemic Treaty
  Show Petition Text
100166 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 125000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The WHO Pandemic Treaty looks set to be one of the biggest power-grabs in living memory, with unelected globalists seeking the power to declare pandemics, and then control your country's response. 

But it's not too late to do something about it. 

SIGN and SHARE this special petition telling Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus that the WHO will never usurp your nation's sovereignty.

The past two years have been rife with infringements on personal liberties and civil rights by national governments, but now the World Health Organization is seeking to appropriate those same abusive powers to itself at a global level. 

194 member states representing 99% of the world's population are expected to sign pandemic treaties with the WHO that would allow Tedros, or any future Director General, to dictate exactly how your nation would respond to a new disease outbreak which they consider a pandemic.

This attack on national sovereignty will come as no surprise to those who for years have listened to elites like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates discussing their vision for the centralization of power into globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the WHO and the rest of the United Nations. 

SIGN this petition against the WHO's Pandemic Treaty, before it's too late.

Ludicrously, 20 world leaders calling for the treaty, including Tedros, Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron, compared the post-Covid world to the post-WWII period, saying similar co-operation is now needed to "dispel the temptations of isolationism and nationalism, and to address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and co-operation - namely peace, prosperity, health and security."

Australian PM Scott Morrison is the latest leader to express support for a “pandemic treaty”.

The stated intention of the WHO is to “kickstart a global process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.”

The wheels are already in motion, with the Biden administration officially proposing the initial steps towards handing global pandemic control to the WHO. 

Biden's representatives have submitted amendments to the WHO's International Health Regulations (IHR), which would give the Director General the right to declare health emergencies in any nation, even when disputed by the country in question.

These amendments, which would be legally binding under international law, will be voted on by the World Health Assembly (the governing body of the WHO) at a special convention running from May 22-28 and set the stage for a fully-fledged pandemic treaty to be passed. 

SIGN and SHARE the petition telling the WHO that you won't accept any pandemic treaty

The ball has been rolling since the last World Health Assembly meeting in December, where the United States launched negotiations "on a new international health instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response," a U.S. statement read. 

"This momentous step represents our collective responsibility to work together to advance health security and to make the global health system stronger and more responsive. 

"We look forward to broad and deep negotiations using a whole-of-society and whole-of-government approach that will strengthen the international legal framework for public health/pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response and enable us to address issues of equity, accountability, and multisectoral collaboration evident in the COVID-19 pandemic. 

"We know it will take all of us working together across governments, private sector, philanthropy, academia, and civil society to make rapid progress towards a long-term solution for these complex problems," the U.S. statement added.

SIGN the petition today to show the WHO that you won't accept this attack on national sovereignty.

These are precarious times in which freedom and self-determination must be defended from those who would ride rough-shod over your civil rights. 

We do not want to go back to global lockdowns, vaccine mandates and propoganda.

Sign the petition - speak up now!

For More Information:

Biden hands over American sovereignty with proposed WHO treaty - LifeSiteNews

Pandemic Treaty is a backdoor to global governance - LifeSiteNews

Dr. Robert Malone on the WHO's power-grab - LifeSiteNews

**Photo: YouTube Screenshot**

  Hide Petition Text

“I got the vaccine to protect myself, my family, and my community,” she continued. “And today, my baby is born and he is perfectly healthy.”

There is ample data to show that the COVID jabs are far more likely to hurt than help a woman’s ability to conceive or give birth to a child. From the beginning of the COVID shot rollout, healthcare professionals were warning that pregnant women should not risk the jab, since they were excluded from preauthorization clinical trials. Only limited data on the jabs’ safety for the demographic was available by the time of their emergency use authorization (EUA).

In fact, documents that were later released by the FDA, due to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, showed that in post-Pfizer jab rollout data, a staggering 238 of the 270 of the pregnant women did not report the outcomes of their pregnancies following reception of the jab.

Of the women who did report outcomes, however, 23 of them reportedly lost their babies via spontaneous abortion, 2 had premature births with neonatal death, 2 had spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death, one spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and one pregnancy with “normal outcome.” That means that of 32 pregnancies with known outcome, 28 resulted in fetal death – an 87.5% pregnancy loss rate.

The Open Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has documented 4,889 miscarriage reports following COVID “vaccination”  through July 22, 2022. VAERS is estimated to report only a small percentage of actual adverse events, since historically, fewer than 1% of adverse events have ever been reported to it. 

Many women have given painful testimony about how their babies died in the womb shortly following their reception of a COVID shot, such as an Australian mother who shared in January that five days after she received a second dose of the Pfizer shot, her full-term unborn baby girl died from a brain hemorrhage.

READ: FOIA docs reveal Pfizer shot caused avalanche of miscarriages, stillborn babies

Dr. Mercola recently pointed out that many countries are now reporting sudden declines in live birth rates. “In the five countries with the highest COVID jab uptake, fertility has dropped by an average of 15.2 percent, whereas the five countries with the lowest COVID jab uptake have seen an average decline of just 4.66 percent,” Mercola noted.

Mercola highlighted a report shared in a July 5, 2022 Counter Signal article sharing concerns expressed by Hungarian MP Dúró Dóra during a Parliamentary speech:

In January this year, something happened that has not happened for decades. The birth rate fell by 20% compared to the same period last year. And what is even more worrying is that the fertility has also fallen – something not seen since 2011 …

[A] researcher at the KRTK Institute of Economics points out that this drastic decline came just nine months after the COVID mass vaccinations began in Hungary.

In fact, research from as early as 2012 shows that the mRNA technology behind the experimental COVID-19 shots can lead to critical problems with fertility and pregnancy, as Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet noted during an August, 2021 “Stop the Shot” conference

Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former VP at Pfizer, pointed to research on lipid nanoparticles that “surround the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines,” which shows that these particles “accumulate in the ovaries of rats,” according to a report released by Pfizer in response to a freedom-of-information request.

The report “shows very clearly that the lipid nanoparticles accumulate at least twenty-fold [in the ovaries] compared with other tissues,” Yeadon said during the “Stop the Shot” conference. “No one has evaluated what the consequences of that are.”

Help Jenny Porter recover from her vaccine injury: LifeFunder

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

3 Comments

    Loading...