News
Featured Image
Dr. Naomi WolfRobin Marchant / Stringer / Getty

(LifeSiteNews) – Outspoken lockdown and vaccine passport critic Dr. Naomi Wolf has had her Daily Clout YouTube channel restored by the social media giant less than a week after taking it down over apparent “claims about COVID-19 vaccinations that contradict expert consensus” made in the interview.

Wolf, an author, political commentator and self-described “life-long Democrat,” originally saw her political discussion channel removed by YouTube on August 24, with the Big Tech firm claiming that a video featuring Wolf and mass-vaccination critic Leslie Manookian violated the company’s “medical misinformation policy.”

Manookian is the founder and president of Health Freedom Defense Fund, “a non-profit which seeks to rectify health injustice through education, advocacy, and legal challenges to unjust mandates, laws, and policies that undermine our health freedoms and human rights.”

During the interview, Wolf and Manookian discussed the possible conflicts of interest found in the fact that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diease (NIAID), run by Chief Medical Adviser to the President Dr. Anthony Fauci, holds patents for the experimental COVID-19 vaccines, yet is part of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) which has been actively encouraging the shots, The Epoch Times reported.

The NIAID is also under the umbrella of the National Institutes for Health (NIH), which allows its employees to receive up to $150,000 per year for each patent under their name.

Though the information discussed throughout the interview is publicly available, YouTube determined that either Wolf or Manookian had made “claims about COVID-19 vaccinations that contradict expert consensus from local health authorities or the World Health Organization (WHO),” which the company does not allow on its platform.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: No to mandatory vaccination for the coronavirus
  Show Petition Text
1073487 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 1100000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

People of goodwill can disagree about the safety, efficacy and religious implications of a new vaccine for the coronavirus.

But, everyone should agree on this point:

No government can force anyone who has reached legal adulthood to be vaccinated for the coronavirus. Equally, no government can vaccinate minors for the coronavirus against the will of their parents or guardians.

Please SIGN this urgent petition which urges policymakers at every level of government to reject calls for mandatory coronavirus vaccination.

Fear of a disease - which we know very little about, relative to other similar diseases - must not lead to knee-jerk reactions regarding public health, nor can it justify supporting the hidden agenda of governmental as well as non-governmental bodies that have apparent conflicts of interest in plans to restrict personal freedoms. 

The so-called "public health experts" have gotten it wrong many times during the current crisis. We should not, therefore, allow their opinions to rush decision-makers into policies regarding vaccination.

And, while some people, like Bill Gates, may have a lot of money, his opinion and that of his NGO (the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) - namely, that life will not return to normal till people are widely vaccinated - should not be permitted to influence policy decisions on a coronavirus vaccination program.

Finally, we must also not allow the rush by pharmaceutical companies to produce a new coronavirus vaccine to, itself, become an imperative for vaccination.

Unwitting citizens must not be used as guinea pigs for New World Order ideologues, or Big Pharma, in pursuit of a vaccine (and, profits) which may not even protect against future mutated strains of the coronavirus.

And it goes without saying that the production of vaccines using aborted babies for cell replication is a total non-starter, as the technique is gravely immoral.

However, if after sufficient study of the issue, a person who has reached the age of majority wishes to be vaccinated with a morally produced vaccine, along with his children, that is his business.

But we cannot and will not permit the government to make that decision for us.

Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition, urging policymakers at all levels of government to reject mandatory coronavirus vaccination.

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Bill Gates: Life won’t go back to ‘normal’ until population 'widely vaccinated' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bill-gates-life-wont-go-back-to-normal-until-population-widely-vaccinated

COVID-19 scare leads to more digital surveillance, talk of mandatory vaccine 'tattoos' for kids' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-19-scare-leads-to-more-digital-surveillance-talk-of-mandatory-vaccine-tattoos-for-kids

Trudeau says no return to ‘normal’ without vaccine: 'Could take 12 to 18 months' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-says-no-return-to-normal-without-vaccine-could-take-12-to-18-months

Trudeau mulls making coronavirus vaccine mandatory for Canadians - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-mulls-making-coronavirus-vaccine-mandatory-for-canadians

US bishop vows to ‘refuse’ COVID-19 vaccine if made from ‘aborted fetal tissue' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-bishop-vows-to-refuse-covid-19-vaccine-if-made-from-aborted-fetal-tissue

** While LifeSite opposes immorally-produced vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines, we do not have a position on any particular coronavirus vaccines produced without such moral problems. We realize many have general concerns about vaccines, but also recognize that millions of lives have been saved due to vaccines.

*** Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

Wolf expressed her shock at the time of the YouTube ban, defending her actions as simply “reporting on successful legal efforts or legislative efforts to ban vaccine passports, to ban vaccine discrimination, or to change policy around mask mandates.”

Despite belonging to the political Left, Wolf acknowledged that “many credible important voices are being de-platformed, a good proportion on the right – I happen to be on the left.”

The author blasted the government for what she sees as collaboration with Big Tech to silence opposing voices: “I believe that government is not allowed to use private industry to go around the First Amendment … so if there’s any coordination there, that is unlawful and that’s what [the legal process of] discovery is for.”

“I think something very serious indeed is happening if a channel devoted to educating people from all walks of life, all political persuasions, every age, about democracy in America is closed down,” she continued. “That’s really serious.”

Just days after the ban was first imposed, on August 26 YouTube delivered another email to Wolf, who co-founded the Daily Clout channel, informing her that it had made a mistaken judgement, and that the account would be re-opened and the video reinstated.

“We’re pleased to let you know that we’ve recently reviewed your YouTube account, and after taking another look, we can confirm that it is not in violation of our Terms of Service. We have lifted the suspension of your account, and it is once again active and operational,” YouTube’s communication read.

Wolf subsequently told The Epoch Times that the restoration of her channel was incomplete, with thousands of subscribers having been removed and hundreds of thousands of views vanishing from the video with which YouTube took umbrage.

“[A]ny small business owner, or any news outlet, or any reporter” can be silenced by powerful outlets such as YouTube, Wolf lamented. She added that “damage can be done to their business or their reputation at any time … it’s not just about me, but it’s about Daily Clout, the community, and the people who count on us to keep them informed.”

Wolf strongly criticized the ease with which companies like YouTube can cancel individual voices, calling the growing media censorship “unsustainable if we want to survive as a democracy.”

Wolf suggested that “proposals to regulate social media platforms as utilities makes sense conceptually,” given that it is “not American to police speech in this way.”

She also raised concern over the “warp speed” at which the Chinese-style social credit system appears to be being implemented in the U.S.

Wolf was among the earlier voices to raise red flags about so-called vaccine passport schemes, calling the system “bio-fascism … of a bio-security state in which the freedoms and liberties of the West will be suspended.”

“Once the vaccine passport is accepted, unless we can stop it, as we’ve seen from Israel, it’s a matter of months before you no longer have freedom of assembly, freedom of speech, freedom to pray, freedom to run your business, privacy of your medical records — it will all be gone unless we can stop this,” Wolf said in an April interview.

Regarding the implementation of a social credit system, she admitted to being “day and night terrified about it,” adding that she may be particularly prone to being targeted by the system as she was “one of the first voices to really raise the alarm about vaccine passports.”

Prior to her YouTube ban, Wolf had already been cancelled by Twitter in June for her criticism of COVID passports, with the company claiming, much like YouTube, that she violated their rules on COVID-19 information.

At the time, Wolf warned that the Chinese social credit system could be implemented through vaccine passports, telling Fox News that “[i]t is not about the vaccine, it’s not about the virus, it’s about your data. Once this rolls out, you don’t have a choice about being part of the system.”

“How does [the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)] keep a billion people under the thumb of a totalitarian regime?” she asked. “The CCP can find any dissident within five minutes, and that can happen here literally within months.”

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here. 

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.