Featured Image
 Michael Hogan / LifeSiteNews

March 3, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – This past weekend’s annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) featured a lively panel on sanctity of life issues. This panel, entitled “Hard Questions for the Hard Cases: How to Defend Life” featured four articulate pro-life women. The panelists included Alison Centofante, the Director of Strategic Communications at Live Action, Emily Berning, the President and Co-Founder of Let them Live, and Congresswoman Michelle Fischbach, a newly elected Republican Congresswoman who represents the 7th district of Minnesota. The panel was moderated by Kelly Jane Torrance, the Associate Editorial Page Editor of the New York Post.

As the title indicated, the panel intended to give CPAC attendees information about how to best defend unborn children – particularly those conceived in difficult circumstances. The first question involved how to best engage people who were not religious. Congresswoman Fischbach commented on developments in ultrasound technology. She stated that “science is showing us so much about the humanity of the unborn.” Berning, whose non-profit provides financial assistance to pregnant women in need, emphasized that they make it a point support all women. “We wanted to switch up the narrative and make sure we were reaching beyond the church,” she said.

The next question dealt with pregnancies that threaten the life of the mother. Centofante stated that, “Abortion is the direct killing of that baby. It is violent. It is terrible.” Regarding specific situations where a pregnancy poses a risk to the life of the mother, Centofante said that the world’s leading OB-GYNs, including some former abortionists, state that the goal should always to save both mother and child. She added that either an early delivery or an emergency C-section are better options for a woman facing a life-threatening pregnancy. Congresswoman Fischbach also warned attendees to be wary of pro-life legislation that contains “health” exemptions. This is because health can be “defined broadly” and limit the ability of pro-life laws to protect preborn children.

Torrance then asked the panelists about unborn children diagnosed with serious disabilities. Here the panelists emphasized that these children are human beings worthy of legal protection. Centofante related a story about two pregnant sisters whose unborn children were both diagnosed with disabilities. One chose perinatal and palliative care and one chose abortion. In the aftermath “one has memories and other has a secret,” she said. 

“Abortion is traumatizing,” added Behring. “It is not an easy solution.” Centofante also added that is “not one person’s job to decide if another person’s life is fulfilled.” She added that “90 percent of children diagnosed with Down Syndrome are aborted. These are amazing children!” She urged pro-lifers to “step up and defend this demographic.”

The final question posed by Torrance asked the panelists how to respond to the argument that pro-life laws do not result in fewer abortions, but more abortions in unsafe circumstances.  In their responses, the panelists emphasized that legal abortions are often unsafe. Congresswoman Fischbach stated that abortions are not safe for either the baby or the woman. She added that many women who obtain abortions have complications including perforated uteruses. She complained that supporters of legal abortion opposed a bill she introduced in the Minnesota State Senate that would license abortion clinics like other medical facilities. “The media refuses to cover instances where the abortion industry fails.”

Added Centofante, “Tanya Reeves died!”

Toward the end of the panel, the panelists emphasized the support that was available for pregnant women in need. “Circumstances are temporary. Abortion is permanent,” said Berning, “Circumstances do not define you as a mother or define you as a person.” Berning added that pro-lifers can give women more options and can help with finances and emotional support. Centofante echoed these comments saying that “Pro-aborts are the only ones saying that you cannot do it all.” She also mentioned the resources available to pregnant women stating that “All the things we do, we do for free.”

— Article continues below Petition —
URGENT PETITION: Tell the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade
  Show Petition Text
61373 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 70000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

PETITION UPDATE (9/26/2020):

With President Trump's nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court left by the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, we are closer than we have been in decades to seeing Roe vs. Wade overturned.

We now encourage the Senate to confirm Barrett as the next Associate Justice of the Supreme Court.

Judge Barrett has a fantastic track recond on sanctity of life issues, has seven children, and is a devout believer. She is the perfect remedy for Ruth Bader Ginsburg's radical pro-abortionism.

Please READ the full story here: 'BREAKING: Trump nominates Catholic mom of 7 Judge Amy Coney Barrett to Supreme Court'

And then, please SIGN this petition telling the High Court that it's now time to end the activist Roe vs. Wade judgment. Thank you!


PETITION UPDATE (6/29/2020):

In a decision which has imperiled more abortion-minded women, sentenced more preborn to death, and upset pro-lifers across the nation,the United States Supreme Court decided 5-4 to strike down a Louisiana law requiring basic medical precautions in the event of abortion complications, with Chief Justice John Roberts reversing his own past decision to uphold a similar Texas law.

Liberal Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the majority opinion, which held that the Louisiana law was unconstitutional for the simple fact that it was “almost word-for-word identical” to the Texas one the court already struck down in 2016.

In his concurring opinion, Chief Justice Roberts acknowledged that he had “joined the dissent in Whole Woman’s Health and continue to believe that the case was wrongly decided. The question today however is not whether Whole Woman’s Health was right or wrong, but whether to adhere to it in deciding the present case.”

We call on the Supreme Court to stop supporting the culture of death and overturn Roe vs Wade, now.

PETITION UPDATE (1/20/2020):

Hundreds of thousands of people will gather in Washington, D.C., this coming Friday, January 24th, for the March for Life. They will be praying for an end to Roe vs Wade, as the Supreme Court will hear a crucial, abortion-related case later this year in March. United our voices can change the course of history. Sign this petition TODAY! (LEARN MORE BELOW)


In advance of the Supreme Court's hearing arguments in an important abortion case later this year in March, 207 U.S. Senators and Representatives have signed amicus briefs supporting a Louisiana law requiring abortionists to have admitting privileges at a hospital nearby an abortion center.

Some of these supporting briefs also suggest that now is the time to reconsider Roe vs Wade as sound law.

Please SIGN this petition, calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down Roe vs Wade.


More than 60 million Americans have been slaughtered in their mother's wombs as a result of Roe v. Wade. This activist, unconstitutional ruling in 1973 has left countless women emotionally and psychologically scarred. 

It was believed by many that Roe would be overturned in 1992 with Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Despite having eight Republican-appointed judges at the time, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to uphold it. 

Since then, major gains have been made in the fight for life, and many lives have been saved. 

However, Roe v. Wade remains the law of the land, leaving millions of defenseless pre-born children vulnerable to murder.

According to a 2016 study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 35% of aborted babies are African American, despite black women only making up six percent of the U.S. population. 19% of aborted babies are Hispanic.

We thus again call on the court to do everything they can to end Roe vs Wade.

Now is the time for pro-lifers to join together and ensure that all of God's children have a right to life.

Roe v. Wade must come to an end!





  Hide Petition Text

The moderator Kelly Jane Torrance concluded the panel by commending the panelists. She stated that “You lovely ladies answered every question with aplomb.”  Because of the strong and insightful comments of all the panelists, Torrance felt that “minds were changed.”

Michael J. New is a Visiting Assistant Professor at the Busch School of Business at The Catholic University of America and an Associate Scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute. Follow him on Twitter @Michael_J_New.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.