Opinion
Featured Image
EuthanasiaShutterstock

(Euthanasia Prevention Coalition) – In a new interview conducted by Lee Harding, published on November 14 by the Epoch Times, I joined Amy Hasbrouck from Toujour Vivant – Not Dead Yet, and Angelina Ireland from the Delta Hospice Society to discuss the direction of euthanasia (MAiD) in Canada.

Harding began by noting that the Québec euthanasia data released on October 20, showed that the number of MAiD deaths increased by 37% to 2426 (April 1, 2020 – March 31, 2021) representing 3.3% of all deaths. Harding asked why the numbers of euthanasia deaths is increasing so quickly.

Among other things, I told Harding how “in the discussion leading up to Bill C-7, all of the cultural taboos about killing people with disabilities or extending this (MAiD) to people with mental health issues and things like that, it was breaking down the negativity or the concept of maybe it’s not a good idea to do this to anyone for any reason.”

“The more we talk about it, the more it will happen. The more people will promote it, the more people will think it’s fine and the more people will die this way. … In a sense, death is becoming an industry. The fact is that all these things have moved our social mores.”

I then spoke about a call that I received from a woman who was upset her husband had asked to die by euthanasia.

“She’s calling me up all upset, saying, ‘My husband would have never supported this, never. What’s happening?’ And we had a long discussion. She found out that the one nurse in palliative care had spoken to him for two hours in the middle of the night, convincing him that it was the right thing to do.

They say this is all about freedom and choice and autonomy, and yet you’re getting calls like this.”

Harding also interviewed Angelina Ireland, the President of the Delta Hospice Society, an organization that lost government funding after it refused to participate in euthanasia. Ireland commented on the effect of euthanasia laws in the country:

“They can kill you at your home, the hospital, long-term care facility, hospice, and now the funeral home. But if one actually wants to live — that’s a lot more difficult.”

Continuing, she noted how, due to additional impact which came from “the firing of thousands of health-care workers across Canada, we cannot so easily access even routine surgeries and tests for our own well-being. Where are the priorities?”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Urge the Quebec Knights of Columbus to REVERSE draconian vaccination requirements
  Show Petition Text
2958 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 4000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The Knights of Columbus in Quebec have apparently begun to pressurize and bully unvaccinated council members and officers who decline to take the COVID jab.

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition to the Quebec Knights of Columbus, urging the Catholic men's fraternal organization to reverse course and stop penalizing Knights who refuse these unethical, untested and unsafe vaccines.

According to a letter obtained by LifeSiteNews, the leaders of the Quebec State Council of the Knights have seemingly implemented the following restrictions on unvaccinated members: 1) Effective immediately, unvaccinated knights shall be refused access to meeting and social venues; and, 2) Effective November 15th, any officer not "fully vaccinated" shall be relieved of his duties.

If true (and, there is no reason to believe it is not accurate), this Quebec Knights' policy is not only deeply flawed, but also deeply disturbing.

Indeed, the Catholic Church teaches that a Catholic may use his or her conscience to decide to licitly refuse vaccination.

And, while the Church is allowing Catholics to take these unethical vaccines because of the lack of an ethically produced and tested vaccine, it must noted that the Church IS AGAINST FORCED VACCINATION and vaccine mandates.

Therefore, it is difficult to fathom how a Catholic organization can penalize (and, in effect, try to coerce) Catholics to accept vaccines which have many morally and medically troubling aspects.

To start with, all COVID vaccines available to Knights Quebecois were either developed or tested using aborted fetal cell lines! This very fact should militate against penalizing Knights who cannot accept these jabs, in good conscience, as morally repugnant per se.

And, there are at least three other serious issues with the vaccines, namely:

  1. The vaccines are, themselves, unsafe. The WHO has already reported over 2.1M injuries related to COVID jabs, worldwide.
  2. The vaccines do not effectively stop transmission, and, in fact, probably facilitate transmission by allowing a vaccinated person to carry a large viral load which they can then spread to vaccinated and unvaccinated, alike.
  3. It is unwise to take and promote vaccines which have not undergone sufficient testing (animal, and otherwise), and which have no track record for possible long-term negative complications. Whereas most vaccines have taken between six and ten years to be fully tested and approved, these COVID jabs have only been given for less than a year -- and so, we do not know what the long-term effects will be.

With these issues in mind, please SIGN and SHARE this petition which calls on the Quebec Knights of Columbus State Council to reverse the draconian restrictions being placed against unvaccinated Knights.

The Quebec Knights of Columbus should be prepared to make reasonable accommodations for those members and officers who have decided to refuse these unethical, untested and unsafe vaccines.

After signing, please take a few minutes to contact the Quebec Knights of Columbus to politely, but firmly, ask them to reverse this decision which could seriously impinge on their fellow Knights' ability to follow their consciences in relation to taking a COVID vaccine.

Quebec Knights of Columbus Telephone Numbers: 450-768-0616 or 1866-893-3681

Quebec Knights of Columbus Email: [email protected]

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 

**Photo Credit: Joseph Sohm / Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

Speaking to Amy Hasbrouck, a disability leader in Canada, Harding asked her about the 2019 Truchon decision, which legalized euthanasia for the disabled across Canada. Such a decision, Hasbrouck believes, did more to devalue people with disabling health conditions than empower them.

“The judge, basically, instead of saying, ‘You’re right. That’s the problem of our public policies and the way we treat disabled people. We need to do things differently,’ she said, ‘Oh, yes. You’re right. You should have the right to be killed by the state because, of course, you wouldn’t want to go into a nursing home,” said Hasbrouck.

“So the judge’s solution was, they would be better off dead,” Hasbrouck added.

Hasbrouck mentioned Jonathon Marchand, a Quebec City man with muscular dystrophy, who camped outside the Legislative assembly in a make-shift cage to protest his confinement to a nursing home, rather than being assisted to live independently with supports.

“Quebec resisted and dragged their feet,” Habrouck said. “And ultimately, they allowed Jonathan to create a program for himself, but they refused to extend the pilot project to other people. … [Yet] it costs less for somebody to live in the community than for the person that lives in an institution.”

“It became much more apparent during the COVID pandemic that society in general considered disabled people [and the elderly in nursing homes] as a disposable population. Those are trends that we have seen most recently that are very worrisome,” she added.

Hasbrouck decried the fact that people are not being offered choices to live, but they are being told that they have a choice to die. In other words, people are considered better off dead.

Reprinted with permission from Euthanasia Prevention Coalition

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.