Opinion
Featured Image
 Shutterstock.com

(Alex Schadenburg) – The Final Report of the Expert Panel on MAiD and Mental Illness was submitted to Canada’s Minister of Health, Jean-Yves Duclos and Justice Minsiter, David Lametti on May 6, 2022. Similar to previous “expert” reports the Expert Panel offers recommendations but few clear guidelines.

Canada legalized euthanasia and assisted suicide under the term Medical Aid in Dying (MAiD) when the government passed Bill C-14 in June 2016. Previous to that, the Supreme Court of Canada struck down protections in Canadian law that prohibited euthanasia and assisted suicide in its Carter decision, and euthanasia became legal in Québec in December 2015 with the implementation of Bill 52.

In March 2021, the Canadian government passed Bill C-7 which expanded the MAiD law by permitting euthanasia for people who are not dying, eliminating the 10 day waiting period for people who are terminally ill, and by permitting euthanasia for incompetent people who were previously approved for MAiD. At the last minute, Bill C-7 was amended to permit euthanasia for people with mental illness.

READ: Colombia becomes first Latin American country to legalize assisted suicide for non-terminal patients

When passing Bill C-7 the government acknowledged that euthanasia for mental illness was different than other forms of MAiD, so they stated that there would be a two year moratorium on MAiD for mental illness providing time to develop guidelines around the killing. I believe the two-year moratorium is unenforceable making euthanasia for mental illness legal already.

The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition opposes MAiD. We oppose giving doctors and nurses the right in law to kill people. But considering that the recommentations from the “Expert” Panel on MAiD and Mental Illness concern guidelines for killing people with mental illness, one would think that the guidelines would offer fixed rules. Yet the 19 recommendations for implementing MAiD for mental illness lack clarity on key recommendations.
For instance, recommendation 2 concerning “Establishing Incurability,” states:

MAiD assessors should establish incurability with reference to treatment attempts made up to that point, outcomes of those treatments, and severity and duration of illness, disease or disability.

It is not possible to provide fixed rules for how many treatment attempts, how many kinds of treatments, and over what period of time as this will vary according to the nature and severity of medical conditions the person has and their overall health status. This must be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

The Panel is of the view that the requester and assessors must come to a shared understanding that the person has a serious and incurable illness, disease or disability. As with many chronic conditions, the incurability of a mental disorder cannot be established in the absence of multiple attempts at interventions with therapeutic aims.

Incurability is a requirement in Canada’s MAiD law, and yet the Expert Panel has stated that it is not possible to provide fixed rules concerning treatment.

In the Netherlands, a person requesting euthanasia for mental illness must be willing to try effective treatment. This is not an onerous request considering that the person is requesting to be killed.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Tell the CPC to reinstate conservative leadership candidates!
  Show Petition Text
5355 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 6000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Is the Conservative Party of Canada giving pro-life candidates the cold shoulder in this year's leadership race?

That's what many Canadians have been left to wonder after the CPC recently announced that two conservative, pro-life candidates, Grant Abraham and Joseph Bourgault, would not be eligible to have their names officially placed on the ballot for party leader, even after seemingly meeting all requirements to do so.

Could this be a case of the CPC establishment arbitrarily picking winners and losers in the ongoing leadership election? And, if so, are true conservatives like Abraham and Bourgault the ones being unfairly targeted?

We must ask ourselves -- and the CPC -- these questions.

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition calling on the Leadership Election Organizing Committee (LEOC) of the Conservative Party to immediately reinstate Grant Abraham and Joseph Borgault onto the ballot for party leader in this year's election immediately.

While Grant Abraham, an attorney from British Columbia and Joseph Bourgault, a businessman from Saskatchewan, may not be as well-known as some of their opponents running for Conservative Party Leader, they still managed, with hard work, determination, and grassroots support, to meet all of the stated requirements for their names to be faithfully added to the official CPC leadership ballot for this year's election on September 10th.

According to the CPC, these requirements are for candidates to raise $300,000 and obtain 500 petition signatures -- both of which Abraham and Bourgault actually achieved.

Abraham actually had raised $300,000 for the entry fee, in addition to submitting 598 petition signatures, and, likewise, Bourgault raised nearly $400,000, and submitted over 1,000 petition signatures.

SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition to the CPC now!

Yet even so, the CPC confirmed to the candidates late last weekend that neither had made the final cut because they added a 15% "administration fee" in addition to the $300,000 -- making the actual total they would have needed to raise closer to $350,000 (which, remarkably, still wouldn't explain why at least Bourgault was denied access to the ballot).

Abraham has gone on record declaring that this was false advertising by the party, and that the additional administration fee was never actually communicated to them by the CPC prior to their rejection.

Only four pro-life candidates entered the race for CPC leader this year, and two of them were Abraham and Bourgault.

A third, MP Marc Dalton, failed to meet the fundraising requirements set forth by the party, and a fourth, former leadership candidate and current MP Leslyn Lewis, made it onto the ballot.

So, is the CPC squeezing out conservative, pro-life candidates wherever possible? Are they breaking their own rules to suit the party's establishment, instead of the Canadian people?

It seems that fake conservatives in the CPC establishment are guilty of the same corrupt, power-hungry tendencies they often criticize Liberals for embracing.

Conservatives must demand justice: SIGN and SHARE this petition demanding that members of the Conservative Party's LEOC take immediate action to reinstate Abraham and Bourgault onto the official ballot for CPC Leader.

Both Abraham and Bourgault intend to appeal this grossly unethical and ideologically-discriminatory decision themselves, but they also need support from Canadians like YOU to get the message across!

Thank you!

P.S.  You can support LIFE by attending this year's National March for Life in Ottawa on May 12th! Learn more HERE.


FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'Two pro-life candidates for Conservative Party leadership were disqualified despite raising enough money' (LifeSiteNews)

'Canadian MP Leslyn Lewis becomes only remaining pro-life candidate for Conservative Party leadership' (LifeSiteNews)

**Photo Credit:  Shutterstock

  Hide Petition Text

Similarily, the Expert Panel deals with recommendation 3 concerning “Establishing Irreversibility” in the same manner. It states:

MAiD assessors should establish irreversibility with reference to interventions tried that are designed to improve function, including: recognized rehabilitative and supportive measures that have been tried up to that point, outcomes of those interventions, and the duration of decline.

It is not possible to provide fixed rules for how many attempts at interventions, how many types of interventions, and over how much time, as this will vary according to a requester’s baseline function as well as life goals. Therefore, this must be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

The Panel is of the view that the requester and assessors must come to a shared understanding that the person is in an advanced state of irreversible decline in capability.

Once again, Canada’s MAiD law requires that the person’s condition be irreversible and yet the Expert Panel states that it is not possible to provide fixed rules.

READ: Disabled Canadian woman pursues medically-assisted death after being unable to secure housing

I am concerned that the current Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying will also follow the same direction of this Expert Panel, by offering recommendations but few clear lines.

The Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying (AMAD) is composed of Senators and MPs who are to study and make recommendations concerning:

  1. MAiD for mature minors,
  2. Advance directives for MAiD,
  3. Regulations for Psychiatric MAiD once the C7 sunset clause is lifted March 2023,
  4. The state of palliative care in Canada (was required as part of the 5 year review after C-14 but never completed),
  5. Protections for persons with disabilities.

The mandate of the Special Joint Committee appears oriented to expanding MAiD in Canada.

The Expert Panel made some good recommendations, such as suggesting that assessments be done by independent experts, increasing the reporting requirements, providing income or housing support where necessary, having consultations with First Nations, Métis, and Inuit peoples, but nonetheless, some of these recommendations are too little or too late a response.

People have been lethally injected for loneliness, depression, poverty, fear of isolation and more.

The Expert Panel appears to be attempting to improve Canada’s MAiD law while in reality the fundamental recommendations include no fixed rules.

Remember, the law only requires that a physician or nurse be of the opinion that the person fits the criteria of the law. Therefore, the Report of the Expert Panel on MAiD for Mental illness does not provide any assurances that people who are living with suicidal ideation will not die by euthanasia.

Sadly, Canada legalized euthanasia by giving doctors and nurses the right in law to kill their patients. It only requires that the assessors and the practitioner who lethally injects their patient be only of the opinion that the person, who they killed fit the criteria of the law.

Canada has now expanded the killing to people with mental illness alone and this “Expert Panel” suggests that the killing be done without clear rules. When will people wake up and realize that killing people is not a solution?

Reprinted with permission from Alex Schadenburg

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

0 Comments

    Loading...