(American Thinker) – I’ve lived in California for nearly 50 years, certainly long enough to know the state is wacko. It’s become a self-immolating mess, with policies growing more disastrous as the years go by.
Remember the old adage to “cut off one’s nose to spite one’s face?” That’s us. Our legislature keeps busy dreaming up more and better ways to screw our citizens, easily passing short-sighted laws because there is virtually no real opposition.
If your state wants to pass “ranked-choice voting” and “open primary” laws, run the other way! They are a direct path to one-party rule, especially paired with corruption in the voting process.
When it comes to the current supply chain crisis, our state’s ineptitude is certainly apparent. Here’s why I think that is or, at least, what I’ve been able to ferret out by hunting online and using my ability to put two and two together and come up with four. I will say, I’m an absolute neophyte when it comes to this subject, and perfectly willing to admit it.
A few things, it seems to me, have played a part in the current crisis: Back in 2008, the state passed some onerous air quality legislation, that mandated truck engines be “upgraded” by certain dates. It was a gradual process, but older engines were simply not going to be able to be registered by the year 2020.
If you think about this law’s actual effect on trucking in the state, I’m sure you’ll realize (not that the legislators did) that many companies and independent truckers changed their work patterns because they couldn’t, or didn’t want to, spend the money to change out their trucks’ engines, especially since they operated in multiple states, and could avoid our expensive mandates.
There’s the very recent law about employment, AB5, that basically eliminated independent truckers. You need to be a salaried employee to drive in California unless you fit some pretty impossible criteria. I’m not an expert here, either, but I can imagine the entanglements. Again, since long-haul truckers work in multiple states, California has rules different than anywhere else, so why not avoid it?
Then, of course, there’s the newest regulation (don’t laugh!) that requires transitioning to zero-emission trucks. This starts taking effect in 2024.
If you don’t currently have a truck, no matter the possibility of making some money in the short term, are you going to invest in one when you won’t be able to use it after a few years? And, given that currently available zero-emission semi-trucks have a range of (cough cough) 250 miles between charges, exactly how are you going to do long-haul trucking in such a truck?
That zero-emission fantasy is about as absurd as our newest law, eliminating small gas-powered engines, including generators and chain saws. I’m sure that rechargeable chain saw will work for at least 10 minutes and the solar generator will run your refrigerator for that long if it’s during a storm. See what I mean about short-sighted rules?
PETITION UPDATE (9/27/21) -
United has agreed to put off its threatened COVID vaccine mandate for another 2 weeks, as proceedings came to a screeching halt in federal court last Friday.
Mark Paoletta, a partner at Schaerr Jaffe representing the plaintiffs, was quoted by Breitbart as saying:
"Now everyone can follow the court’s decision to take the time and care needed to carefully consider the legitimate claims our clients have as we seek a solution that allows United to take necessary steps to combat COVID-19 while respecting the civil rights of valuable employees who have sincere religious objections or medical conditions that make them unable to take the vaccine."
While this appears to be a lessening of tensions and possibly a step in the right direction, we must wait till the case resumes on October 15 to see if United will scrap their draconian mandate.
In the meantime, we must continue to apply pressure on United.
So, please continue to SIGN and SHARE this pledge to boycott the airline giant for threatening to impose harsh measures - including forced unpaid leave - in order to coerce employees with religious or medical objections to the vaccine to take the jab.
Thank you for continuing to SIGN and SHARE!
United Airlines is accused of not respecting the religious and medical COVID vaccine exemptions which the company offered to employees who cannot, in good conscience or health, take the vaccine.
2,000 employees of the industry giant are represented in two court cases which have been initiated to stop United from laying-off or indefinitely furloughing workers who have sought COVID vaccine exemptions.
Please SIGN this BOYCOTT of United and send the airline a stong message that you will not support the implementation of these draconian measures.
Many United Airlines employees have sincerely held religious objections to taking the COVID vaccines, while other employees have been told by their doctors not to take the vaccine due to health concerns.
The religious and medical rights of these employees must be respected, and, will hopefully be vindicated by the courts.
But, airlines are for-profit businesses, and apart from the legal incentives, there must also be financial incentives for them to respect their employees' religious and medical rights, and, indeed, the same rights of all Americans.
And, that's why we are calling for a boycott.
The CEO of United Airlines, Scott Kirby, and HR Manager, Kate Gebo, need to understand that the American public will not support businesses who force their employees or customers to violate their religious beliefs or their doctors' recommendations.
Of course, this is totally unnecessary.
United could simply make reasonable accommodations for their employees who are claiming either a religious or medical exemption.
But, until United adopts that policy, we are asking you to consider boycotting the "unfriendly skies" and find another airline for your travel needs. By doing so, you will meaningfully stand shoulder-to-shoulder with these aggrieved United employees.
Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition to boycott United Airlines over the company's failure to respect religious and medical COVID vaccine exemptions for its employees.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
'Pilots seek restraining order against United Airlines’ ‘unlawful, life-threatening, vaccine-mandate’' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pilots-seek-restraining-order-against-united-airlines-unlawful-life-threatening-vaccine-mandate/
'United Airlines will put employees with religious, medical COVID vaccine exemptions on unpaid leave' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/739949/
**Photo Credit: EQRoy / Shutterstock.com
Add the fact that there are state and city vaccination requirements for truckers. As this article points out, that’s going to preclude anyone not vaccinated from trucking in the state. Moreover, if one is on the road, it’s not practical to do the testing that’s offered as an alternative, not to mention that 20% of the truckers polled didn’t want the jab.
I suspect the same problems exist for longshoremen. They can’t get enough workers. Why? Although I’ve had a hard time finding exact requirements, I have ascertained that the Port of Long Beach, for one, hires employees through the city’s civil service department.
And I know city workers must be vaccinated, just like firemen, police, and hospital workers, I’m guessing there is not much they can do to convince people who don’t want the jab or have had COVID already, to take it. I know if I were strong-armed that way, I’d resist on principle.
That same problem of too few workers affects the ports that can’t do the offloading and, with the missing trucks, there’s no place to store anything that’s offloaded. It all seems like the perfect storm.
Reprinted with permission from American Thinker