Opinion
Featured Image
 Allison C Bailey/Shutterstock

(LifeSiteNews) — The headline of a document created by Jane’s Army — a group dedicated to electing pro-abortion politicians in Illinois — reads “The Top 10 Worst Things about the Anti-Choice Movement.” It was brought to my attention that American Life League was specifically mentioned, so of course I had to read it to see what this group had to say.

What I found was a document riddled with misleading statements, misinformation, and bizarre arguments that barely even make sense.

As one of the important goals of American Life League (ALL) is to help teach the truth while building a culture of life, I think it’s extremely important to address each of the 10 “worst things” listed by Jane’s Army. In this two-part series, we will unpack some of what Jane’s Army stated (in bold) and then explain the truth in simple terms.

1. ‘The anti-choice movement [including ALL] doesn’t just want to ban abortion, they want to ban birth control’

ALL and other organizations that oppose birth control oppose it for many reasons. It can act an as abortifacient and kill a very young preborn baby.

In addition, we know the detrimental effects of birth control on a woman’s body. Because we love both moms and babies, we want women to know the truth about what the pill can do to her health, especially since the International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified the pill as a Group 1 carcinogen.

Finally, we oppose birth control because it is contrary to Catholic Church teaching, as it thwarts one of the two purposes of marriage. A marriage is meant to be both unitive and procreative. The use of birth control thwarts the procreative aspect. But despite all the evidence that the pill harms women, it does not seem likely that birth control will ever be banned. This is not something that legislators are even voting on at this time; nor are they planning to do so in the near future. So speaking of hypotheticals only fuels anger and resentment, which seems to be the group’s intention.

2. ‘The anti-choice movement demands choice when it comes to COVID vaccines, but opposes choice when it comes to reproductive health care decisions.’

Healthcare is something done proactively to take care of a person’s health. According to Merriam Webster, it is an “effort made to maintain or restore physical, mental, or emotional well-being especially by trained and licensed professionals.” Abortion is not healthcare. Abortion kills a child every single time. Inflicting death is the exact opposite of healthcare.

While we agree that a woman has a choice when it comes to just her own body, we disagree that she should be able to make the choice to kill an innocent baby who resides within her body. Refusal to receive a vaccine does not result in a dead baby. By its nature, a vaccine is considered healthcare, but we should all have a choice regarding what we put into our bodies. People’s reasoning for not wanting to receive the COVID vaccine vary, but the two most popular reasons are that the vaccines were derived from a cell line from an aborted baby and that the vaccine was rushed. Both of these are very compelling reasons.

But in reality, when you come right down to it, comparing abortion to receiving a vaccine is like comparing apples and shoes. They are not the same, and there’s no point in this comparison.

3. ‘There is a strong tie between anti-choice extremists and white supremacists. Many of those who participated in the January 6th insurrection have track records of violently protesting at medical centers that provide abortion care’

Simply claiming that a “strong tie” exists does not actually mean that one exists. The document links to a biased article full of speculation and hearsay that seems to have the same agenda as Jane’s Army. Further, the organization presents no hard facts or data in its document, nor does it define what it means by “violently protesting.”

Had some of the people at the Capitol on January 6 also protested at abortion clinics at some point in their lives? Quite possibly. But the people who entered the Capitol are not representative of the pro-life movement. At ALL, we do not condone violence of any sort. Further, we love all moms and babies—regardless of race. We don’t see color; we see human beings. Sadly, we know that abortion itself is a violent act, as are many abortion activists. This is a verifiable fact, and this violence has increased exponentially in the last several months, undoubtedly fueled by organizations such as Jane’s Army.

To see the lengths some people will go to in order to ensure that women and their babies are not helped by organizations that care about them, simply read through this list of pregnancy resource centers that have been firebombed, graffitied, threatened, or even destroyed.

4. ‘The anti-choice movement is full of hypocrisy. Anti-choice extremists are not only against abortion, but are also working to do away with initiatives that would help prevent the number of unintended pregnancies like informed sex education, access to birth control, and the morning after pill.’

Let’s break this one down.

A) At American Life League, we do not oppose sex education. We just don’t believe that the place for it is in schools. These are discussions that should be had in the home so that the parents can talk with their children about the reasoning for their beliefs and field any questions.

B) We have already touched on birth control in number 1 above.

C) And as the morning-after pill works in essentially the same way that the pill does (just in higher doses), the same reasoning for birth control applies here as well. Wanting to protect the smallest of babies is not an example of hypocrisy. It’s actually a desire for the equal protection of all human beings.

— Article continues below Petition —
Send prayers for Archie and his parents after 12-year-old's life is ended
  Show Petition Text
13180 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 15000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

UPDATE (8/6/22): We are heartbroken to tell you that Archie's life-support was switched off on Saturday 6 August.

We ask you to add your name to the prayerful message we are sending Archie's parents, Hollie and Paul, who are suffering the most devastating time of their lives. 

Both the European Court of Human Rights and a UK High Court turned down respective applications by Archie's parents to halt the withdrawal of life-support and allow them to transfer their son to hospice care.

This cruel betrayal by the legal and medical establishment, who even denied Archie the right to travel abroad where treatment was being offered to him, represents another blow to the notion that human rights and parents' wishes really matter.

We can only hold Archie and the entire family in our prayers now.

Thank you for your support.

May God have mercy on them all.

-----

Archie Battersbee (12) is on life-support in a UK hospital following a tragic accident, but doctors now want to end his treatment despite his distraught parents begging medics to let God decide when he dies.

Archie's heartbroken mother has submitted an application to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) that prevented the hospital turning off her son's life-support earlier today. 

SIGN this urgent petition in support of Archie and his family - tell the ECHR to Let Archie Live.

Lawyers for the hospital last night told Archie's family that he cannot be moved to a hospice, and that if an application to the ECHR was not received by 9am on 3 August, life support would be withdrawn at 11am.

Thankfully the family's lawyers submitted the ECHR application, or Archie would now be dead.

Archie’s mother Hollie Dance said: “We are very relieved (that Archie's machine was not turned off), we are having to battle every decision with the hospital. We now hope and pray that the ECHR will look favorably on the application."

"We will not give up on Archie until the end. Heartbreakingly, the hospital Trust have told us that we cannot move Archie to a hospice....This is cruel and we are absolutely appalled,” she added.

The family are also receiving offers from doctors abroad to treat Archie, but they are not allowed to transfer their son from the hospital.

On Tuesday government lawyers also convinced the UK's Supreme Court to dismiss the interim measures injunction issued by the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN CRPD), which said Archie’s treatment should not be removed.

Archie's life is on the line - he needs us to raise the alarm throughout the world today.

SIGN AND SHARE this urgent petition today.

It is unspeakably cruel to drag Archie's mother through the courts when her son is in such a devastating condition - she should be allowed to spend this precious time with him, not having to fight tooth and nail to prevent doctors from withdrawing treatment.

While Archie's doctors claim he is "brain-stem dead", not one medic would testify before the courts that this is definitely the case. 

In fact, Archie's parents have footage of their son gripping their fingers, contrary to the doctors' claim he is "brain-stem dead".

Instead, Archie's mom is insisting that God should decide when her son passes, not doctors, lawyers, judges and politicians. 

Archie's dad, Paul Battersbee, fell ill outside the Court of Appeals on 25 July as he awaited a ruling that upheld the hospital's right to withdraw life-support treatment. 

Such is the stress, anxiety and pain that is being inflicted on these poor parents.

Please stand with this sorrowful mother and father today as they fight for their beloved son. 

Sign The Petition: Let Archie Live.

And please say a prayer for Archie and his family - this was the scene before lawyers managed to submit the ECHR application:

 

MORE INFORMATION: 
UK Supreme Court refuses more time for Archie's parents to appeal to UN court - LifeSiteNews

"We will not give up on Archie" - UK mother vows to fight court order - LifeSiteNews

  Hide Petition Text

5. ‘The anti-choice movement claims to be ‘pro-life,’ yet it actively attacks life-affirming programs. . . Nearly all elected anti-choice members of Congress and state legislatures vote against programs to assist pregnant people and mothers, including access to prenatal care, early childhood education, child care, affordable health care, and other initiatives to enhance the lives of children and women.’

Nearly all? That is a bit of hyperbole. We will not speak to the voting records or intentions of all members of all state and national elected bodies, as that would take volumes. But we can say this: If we in the pro-life movement attacked life-affirming programs, would we have over 3,000 pro-life pregnancy centers in the US? Would we have elected leaderspushing for more programs and for recognition of existing ones? These programs, which help millions of people annually, assist moms and babies by offering material assistance, financial assistance, and even shelter.

Pregnancy help centers are located in poor neighborhoods and sometimes near abortion clinics so that those women who feel scared and trapped have someone they can talk to. These facilities, which are often staffed by volunteers, run on donations—the donations of caring pro-life people who choose to give their hard-earned money to help women. Yes, we absolutely need more of these. We need more programs that empower not enable parents after the birth of their child. And we need education programs that teach the dignity of all human beings so that mothers truly understand the humanity of the baby she’s carrying. But to state that pro-life people actively attack life-affirming programs is just blatantly false.

Pro-lifers dedicate their lives to helping women and their babies. We do it out of love, respect, and a belief in the dignity of all human beings. It’s often a difficult job, but unlike the abortion industry, it’s one that does not result in a dead baby or a maimed mother.

There’s much more to unpack! Come back next week to see the rebuttal of the last five arguments presented by Jane’s Army.

Susan Ciancio is a graduate of the University of Notre Dame and has worked as a writer and editor for nearly 19 years; 13 of those years have been in the pro-life sector. Currently, she is the editor of American Life League’s Celebrate Life Magazine—the nation’s premier Catholic pro-life magazine. She is also the executive editor of ALL’s Culture of Life Studies Program—a pre-K-12 Catholic pro-life education organization.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

3 Comments

    Loading...