(Robert Malone) — What is the role of science?
If science has “matured” to the point where it “can” change nature, should it?
In the 21st century, society has come to the point where it has allowed the scientific endeavor to operate under the premise that if a scientist can do something, he or she should be able to do that thing. I will say it outright: this is wrong and in some cases it is immoral.
READ: Study finds ‘unexpected’ correlation between number of COVID shots and risk of infection
As an example, let’s take the transgender movement. This group of people believe that they have the right to change the biological reality of gender through the use of science and medicine; that scientists and physicians, working with the transgender movement, have the right to remold society, to the point where gender is considered by many to be a fluid concept.
This movement has found willing partners (and financial beneficiaries) in physicians, bio-tech, hospitals, Big Tech, and Big Pharma who have profited tremendously from this movement by providing drugs, surgeries, and services to the supposedly “transgender” individual.
The concept of gender fluidity has been pushed on societies and nations across the world in a harmonized and coordinated fashion. This has morphed into the idea that it is a government’s duty to teach children, starting as soon as they are able to conceptualize gender, that gender is something that can be changed through the use of surgery, drugs, hormones, education, behavioral training, and conditioning. That it is the “right” of every child to move from one gender to another, regardless of the long-term consequences to individual health, longevity, happiness, and the family structure.
This concept of gender fluidity is tearing apart the very fabric of society without any evaluation of the scientific progress that has made it possible for this new concept to be pushed to the mainstream. Even worse, these globalized efforts are have been highjacked by transnational corporations, which are making billions off of pharmaceutical products to support what are largely scientific experiments being conducted on a massive scale on humanity across the world.
Sound familiar? Where have we seen this mentality and medical (non)ethics before?
This should not ever have been the role of science or medicine to enable this. It is evil, truly evil.
Creating a large minority of the population to look, act, speak and behave as a different gender is an experiment. It involves trying to change the very nature of biology. Physicians who are prescribing drugs to suppress hormones as well as the hormones themselves, to create an illusion of a different gender, are violating a sacred oath to do no harm. Physicians who are performing “cutting edge” surgeries that involve removing and modifying genitalia are harming people. It needs to stop.
In 2002, the results of a large relevant study were reported in a paper entitled “Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial.” The results of this study literally shut down hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in the United States and elsewhere for many years. All it took was a study to highlight the small increases in cardiac, stroke, and cancer rates in women taking HRT to shut down an entire industry.
READ: Christian woman fired after refusing COVID jab sues employer for religious discrimination
It wasn’t until many years later that safer formulations, at decreased dosages, entered the marketplace again. The truth is that even small amounts of excess hormones can negatively impact the body in myriad ways. Yet, without any long-term studies and regardless of consequences, there is a “revolution” in progress which seeks to change men to women and women to men. This is irresponsible and wrong, and the long term medical harm is unknown.
Sound familiar? Where have we seen this mentality and medical (non)ethics before?
A brief analysis of the hormone suppression drugs, hormones, and a multitude of other drugs being administered to gender “fluid” individuals is horrifying. As we all know, these “medications” aren’t just being prescribed to adults, they are also being administered to children.
The Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine: Department of Medicine has published “Practical Guidelines for Transgender Hormone Treatment,” which is frankly shocking. The drugs listed in the guidelines have myriad side effects and adverse events. No one seems to care.
The WHO Pandemic Treaty looks set to be one of the biggest power-grabs in living memory, with unelected globalists seeking the power to declare pandemics, and then control your country's response.
But it's not too late to do something about it.
SIGN and SHARE this special petition telling Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus that the WHO will never usurp your nation's sovereignty.
The past two years have been rife with infringements on personal liberties and civil rights by national governments, but now the World Health Organization is seeking to appropriate those same abusive powers to itself at a global level.
194 member states representing 99% of the world's population are expected to sign pandemic treaties with the WHO that would allow Tedros, or any future Director General, to dictate exactly how your nation would respond to a new disease outbreak which they consider a pandemic.
This attack on national sovereignty will come as no surprise to those who for years have listened to elites like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates discussing their vision for the centralization of power into globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the WHO and the rest of the United Nations.
SIGN this petition against the WHO's Pandemic Treaty, before it's too late.
Ludicrously, 20 world leaders calling for the treaty, including Tedros, Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron, compared the post-Covid world to the post-WWII period, saying similar co-operation is now needed to "dispel the temptations of isolationism and nationalism, and to address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and co-operation - namely peace, prosperity, health and security."
Australian PM Scott Morrison is the latest leader to express support for a “pandemic treaty”.
The stated intention of the WHO is to “kickstart a global process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.”
The wheels are already in motion, with the Biden administration officially proposing the initial steps towards handing global pandemic control to the WHO.
Biden's representatives have submitted amendments to the WHO's International Health Regulations (IHR), which would give the Director General the right to declare health emergencies in any nation, even when disputed by the country in question.
These amendments, which would be legally binding under international law, will be voted on by the World Health Assembly (the governing body of the WHO) at a special convention running from May 22-28 and set the stage for a fully-fledged pandemic treaty to be passed.
SIGN and SHARE the petition telling the WHO that you won't accept any pandemic treaty
The ball has been rolling since the last World Health Assembly meeting in December, where the United States launched negotiations "on a new international health instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response," a U.S. statement read.
"This momentous step represents our collective responsibility to work together to advance health security and to make the global health system stronger and more responsive.
"We look forward to broad and deep negotiations using a whole-of-society and whole-of-government approach that will strengthen the international legal framework for public health/pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response and enable us to address issues of equity, accountability, and multisectoral collaboration evident in the COVID-19 pandemic.
"We know it will take all of us working together across governments, private sector, philanthropy, academia, and civil society to make rapid progress towards a long-term solution for these complex problems," the U.S. statement added.
SIGN the petition today to show the WHO that you won't accept this attack on national sovereignty.
These are precarious times in which freedom and self-determination must be defended from those who would ride rough-shod over your civil rights.
We do not want to go back to global lockdowns, vaccine mandates and propoganda.
Sign the petition - speak up now!
For More Information:
Biden hands over American sovereignty with proposed WHO treaty - LifeSiteNews
Pandemic Treaty is a backdoor to global governance - LifeSiteNews
Dr. Robert Malone on the WHO's power-grab - LifeSiteNews
**Photo: YouTube Screenshot**
READ: ‘We are not slaves’: Medical freedom activists protest outside Pfizer’s global headquarters in NYC
But this is just one example. Other examples include:
- The injections of baby blood products into a wealthy elite population, so that they can live longer is occurring across the world
- Gain-of-function research to create new and different viruses continues throughout the world at a break-neck pace.
- Bioweapons development programs continue, with almost no oversight.
- The agricultural science of factory farming, which has created breeding grounds for new viruses and toxic bacterial strains, has become normalized.
- Then there are the weather modification programs, which governments are utilizing with increasing frequencies.
- There is even “talk” that head transplant research in humans continues to be conducted in China.
Science knows no bounds. Literally, it has no bounds. No moral or ethical guardrails.
Is a lack of morality in science an immorality? I believe resoundingly, the answer is yes.
There is no Hippocratic Oath for scientists or science. Yet, science has radically changed culture, society, nature, biology, even the world. Science and scientists act as if the practice and practitioners of “Science” were a Godlike entity, free of moral constraints. The ethics of “Science” (or scientism) have all too often been twisted to seek to replace the role of God in society.
READ: German doctor says none of patients’ COVID jab injuries have been offically recognized by gov’t
Science and scientists need a declaration of appropriate behavior and guidance.
A code of ethics. A tradition of “do no harm.” I fully understand that this oath has not stopped some physicians from doing harm, but at least it is something and it acts as a partial barrier between good and evil, that has stood the test of time.
READ: Belgian soccer goalie Arne Espeel dies suddenly at 25 after collapsing on field
Just because something can be done, that does not mean that it should be done. Pandora opened a jar left in her care containing sickness, death, and many other unspecified evils which were then released into the world. In the absence of clear accepted boundaries between the possible and the ethical, once Pandora’s box has been opened, it becomes impossible to reverse the consequences.
Scientific endeavors designed to describe and illuminate the amazingly intricate complexity of the physical world, and to define and describe the truth therein, are essential to comprehending and interacting with that world in a responsible manner.
Scientific endeavors seeking to enable modification of man and the natural world, to enable a transhuman fourth industrial revolution where man and machine become one, where man assumes control of his own evolution via synthetic means, these types of activities must have guardrails. Man is not God. Those who advocate for a second bite of the apple demonstrate a profound, narcissistic lack of wisdom and perspective.
It only takes one Pandora to destroy paradise. As both Robert Oppenheimer and Robert Malone have learned, once the genie has left the bottle, the Jinn travels on the wind and can never be returned. The consequences cannot be predicted.
READ: CDC knew about link between COVID jab, myocarditis as early as May 2021, emails suggest
Reprinted with permission from Robert Malone.