Featured Image
Woman holding an ultrasound scan of her unborn babyShutterstock.com

TORONTO, Ontario (Campaign Life Coalition) – Pro-life free speech is once again under attack in Ontario.

On November 2, the New Democratic Party (NDP) reintroduced a bill at Queen’s Park that, if passed, would ban the practice of pro-life groups freely distributing images of aborted victims that highlight the massacre of some 100,000 babies who are aborted annually in Canada.

Bill 41, an “Act to regulate the mailing of images of fetuses,” states that “no one shall send a graphic image of an aborted or otherwise non-viable fetus by mail or otherwise distribute such an image” unless certain conditions are first satisfied, such as the image being first placed in a non-see-through envelope.

The bill, titled the “Viewer Discretion Act,” directly targets the work of pro-life groups that use photographic images to expose the violent horror of abortion. The bill, formerly titled 259, passed first reading in March, but then stalled. It was reintroduced yesterday by NDP MP Terrance Kernaghan (London North Centre).

The bill may be dead on arrival. Discrimination based on content opposes the Charter right to freedom of expression. This freedom applies to pro-life advocates as much as anyone else.

Critics say that the images are too graphic to be left in the mailboxes or on the doorsteps of family homes. Even some in the pro-life movement don’t agree with using these images as an educational tool. But, the pro-life groups who deliver the images say that they do change people’s hearts and minds on abortion and save lives. How?

One of the traits that make us human is that when we see the pain and suffering of other humans, we seek to alleviate it. When we see injustice suffered by others, we want to bring them justice. When we see cruel oppression, we want to aid the oppressed. What these images accurately show is the suffering, injustice, and oppression inflicted upon the smallest members of the human family.

These are images of victims with whom we share a common humanity. These victims have suffered the worst kind of injustice by having their lives, their futures, their pursuit of happiness, violently stripped from them. The human response to seeing these images should be to fight the evil and end the barbaric practice of abortion.

Graphic imagery is not used in the pro-life movement alone. It’s worthwhile noting how graphic imagery has been used in practically every major social justice campaign since the invention of the camera to help draw attention to the injustice, and so help combat it.

You may have encountered such graphic imagery in the photos of starving children in the developing world to help fight poverty and hunger, of a drowned Syrian boy to help show the tragic plight of refugees, of an open-casket funeral of a murdered black teenager to help fight racial injustice.

Victim images certainly have a place in our country. They are constantly used to help rouse people to get involved in fighting social injustices.

— Article continues below Petition —
Canada's Health Minister: Make abortion pill reversal information available
  Show Petition Text
2567 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 4000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Many women who choose to undergo a medical abortion procedure (Mifegymiso in Canada) change their minds having taken the first pill.

And now, a safe and effective procedure called abortion pill reversal has been developed to assist these women in an attempt to help them save their pre-born child from the effects of this first pill (Mifepristone).

Abortion advocates are currently engaged in a campaign to silence the message that Alliance for Life Ontario is providing women undergoing a medical abortion in Canada, including even calling facts “mis-information”.

Our message is that there is a safe, effective (64%-68%) method that may save their child if they have second thoughts after starting the Mifegymiso process.

That's why Alliance for Life Ontario and LifeSiteNews are now partnering on this petition: To give Canadian women a second chance at choice!

Abortion Pill Reversal is being offered around the world with 2,000 little ones saved to-date.

But, in Canada, abortion advocates do not want women to have a second chance at choice! Alliance for Life Ontario's Facebook page has been taken down after erroneous complaints, and now their website abortionpillreversal.ca is being attacked.

Women deserve to know the truth about this second chance at choice and to know there are physicians trained and willing to help them try and save their child, if that is their choice.

We need your help to let the Minister of Health know that Canadian women do not give up their right to the truth when they choose induced abortion.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition today! Thank you.


Abortion Pill Reversal - A Second Chance: https://abortionpillreversal.ca/

  Hide Petition Text

Why are so many people up in arms against the use of abortion victim photography?

While there may be many concerns (the main ones are outlined and answered here), I think the main reason people don’t like these images is that they really do show something absolutely terrifying and horrific: the slaughter of babies.

People in our nation, many of whom identify as “pro-choice,” don’t want to be confronted with the truth that abortion is horrific, that this procedure gruesomely ends the life of a little human person by crushing, breaking, and ripping apart his or her little human body.

If someone’s been fed the lie that it’s a pregnant woman’s choice to “decide what she does with her own body,” it’s pretty shocking to see that there is another body here that is different from the mother’s body. It’s shocking to see that this little body has arms and legs, fingers and toes, a mouth and lips, ears and eyes, a human face. It’s shocking to discover that this body can bleed when violence is inflicted upon it.

Such images should cause us to weep for what we as a nation have allowed to happen to so many of our precious children.

In a move akin to shooting the messenger while ignoring the message, this bill seeks to censor images of the horror of abortion while ignoring that such horror takes place about 300 times daily in hospitals and abortion mills across our nation.

Instead of lawmakers trying to ban these graphic images, shouldn’t they rather seek to ban the death-dealing abortion procedures from which these horrifying images arise?

Reprinted with permission from Campaign Life Coalition


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.