Opinion
Featured Image
 Felipe Caparros/Shutterstock

(Campaign Life Coalition) – A new book in Canada is marketing assisted suicide to young children, promoting the idea of killing grandma as an act of love and compassion instead of the murder that it is.

Bill Richardson’s new book, Last Week, published in April 2022, has been described by critics as “sensitive” and “compelling.” It presents the killing of the sick and elderly – euphemistically called here in Canada “medical aid in dying” (MAiD) – through the eyes of a young child who must say goodbye to his grandmother, Flippa.

The book mentions Flippa’s daily habit of walking to the beach and swimming in the ocean. However, as she gets older and weaker, Flippa is no longer able to swim in the ocean or do the things she loves. Because of this, life no longer seems worth living. This leads to Flippa’s choice of assisted suicide over a natural death.

With one week until Flippa’s death, the young child faces a variety of emotions, counting down every precious second until the last goodbye. Richardson describes scenes of comradery, as family and friends gather together to laugh, cry, and reminisce over the past as they share fond memories of Flippa’s life.

Through this glimpse into these last moments with a loved one, Richardson attempts to portray euthanasia as a route which allows people to come to grips with a loved one’s death, free from the uncertainty surrounding a natural death.

Richardson, previously a broadcaster with the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), said that he was inspired to write the book because of euthanasia’s growing prevalence in today’s society. He said that because of more and more people viewing euthanasia as a legitimate option, it was an issue that children would increasingly have to deal and cope with.

Richardson, who identifies as “a gay man,” wanted to write a book that would help children come to grips with their emotions, while at the same time helping them to understand the concept of someone choosing their own death.

“Are you sure?” the child asks his grandmother, in one emotional scene. “Very sure,” she answers confidently.

Euthanasia or “physician-assisted suicide” was legalized in Canada in 2016 with Bill C-14. While the original bill legalized euthanasia for only the terminally ill or for cases where death was “reasonably foreseeable,” new and ambiguous legislation makes MAiD available to a much wider group throughout Canada. In 2021, Bill C-7 was passed which allows euthanasia for people whose deaths are not “reasonably foreseeable,” including those with mental illness.

Alex Schadenberg, executive director of Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, told Campaign Life Coalition that a book such as Richardson’s is part of a massive campaign in Canada to try and normalize euthanasia.

“The movement from legalization to all-out killing has come very quickly,” he said. Schadenberg added that, traditionally, family and friends would journey with a sick person as they approached death, but that today, this journey is “replaced with the planned death by lethal injection.” He noted that since euthanasia is “caused by someone, and not a natural death,” it, therefore, “counters the normal response to dying.”

When asked about his thoughts on Richardson’s new book, Schadenberg said that children see the world in a straightforward manner, and “a book which normalizes the concept of killing grandma is designed to change the cultural view of living.” He said that Canada has quickly gone down the road of killing its own citizens, highlighting that, while euthanasia originally began as an option for people already dying, it quickly extended to those who were not terminally ill. From there, it included people with mental illness, those with disabilities, and is currently moving towards the possibility of euthanasia for children.

In conclusion, Schadenberg said that Canada is a prime example of why euthanasia must never be legalized.

— Article continues below Petition —
Tell Dave Rubin: Aborting disabled babies is cruel.
  Show Petition Text
5456 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 6000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Dave Rubin (left) hosts one of the most popular conservative chat-shows on YouTube, but we now know his views are as extreme as many on the left.

Not only are Rubin and his homosexual partner using surrogate mothers to bear two babies, thus deliberately depriving the children of their true mothers' care once born, but he also admitted those babies would have been aborted if found to have severe disabilities. 

SIGN the petition telling Dave Rubin that true conservatives protect life and uphold the right of children to be raised by their mothers.

Mr. Rubin recently said he also supports abortion up until 12 weeks, compounding the regrettable pro-eugenics stance he has taken towards unborn babies with severe disabilities. 

There are few things more tragic in our world today than the disposable attitude of many people towards innocent human life, but that is exactly what Rubin thinks is acceptable.

This must be called out - it's simply abhorrent to treat the disabled, the unwanted, and the vulnerable with such callous disregard. 

Tell Dave Rubin that his pro-eugenics views have no place in a humane society.

Can you imagine finding out your parents would have aborted you if you had a severe disability? 

Well, that's unfortunately what will happen to the children Rubin raises if they someday read his latest book, "Don't Burn This Country".

There he shares that he and his family's decision would have been to "terminate the pregnancy" if a severe disability was found in one of the babies now being borne by their surrogate mothers. 

Rubin must understand how cruel this entire situation is, not only for the mothers and their children who will be taken away, but also for disabled people to know they are essentially thought of as "lives unworthy of life."

Real conservatives must speak up now and tell Rubin that his pro-abortion views are abhorrent.

Mr. Rubin's public split with the left is to be welcomed, but "conservative" leaders like him will do much more harm than good if they continue using their platform to undermine the family and the right of children to be born.

If we let these cornerstones of society be attacked from within, what hope have we of building a culture we can be proud to hand on?

Make a stand today for unborn children and their mothers - tell Dave Rubin that he's wrong.

True conservatives cannot afford to take the easy shortcut of ignoring Rubin's cruel position, lest we continue to be shunted further left, becoming radical liberals in everything but name.

So, please SIGN and SHARE this petition today,

MORE INFORMATION:

Why are leading conservatives congratulating Dave Rubin and his 'husband'? - LifeSiteNews

Dave Rubin says he'd ask his surrogate to abort any disabled child - The Bridgehead

**Main Image: YouTube screenshot of Dave Rubin talking to Donald Trump Jr.**

  Hide Petition Text

Seth Dillon, CEO of the U.S.-based satire site The Babylon Bee also commented on Richardson’s new book, calling it “deeply disturbing.”

“They want to normalize this stuff so that children grow up thinking it’s normal and healthy and good,” he told pro-life activists at a gala dinner following the Canadian National March for Life on May 12. “There’s a reason they’re writing books from a child’s view on this. It’s to get into the heads and hearts of children and normalize this stuff.”

Dillon said he could not believe that, instead of focusing on improving care systems and the quality of life for people, leftist elites prepare children for the reality of the old and the sick getting “put down” by doctors who should be helping them. “It’s depressing,” he said.

Not too many years ago, doctors still recognized the sanctity of life and swore to treat each patient with the respect and dignity that they deserved. In acceptance and acknowledgement of the sanctity of life, doctors swore to uphold the value of human life from conception to its natural end when they took the Hippocratic Oath: “I will not give a lethal drug to anyone if I am asked, nor will I advise such a plan; and similarly, I will not give women a pessary to cause an abortion.”

Sadly, medical professionals today are no longer committed to upholding and protecting the sanctity of life. Instead of encouraging patients to embrace the life they were given and reminding them of their inherent value, doctors are trained to accept and even promote a patient’s request to be murdered.

Instead of giving such individuals the help and comfort they deserve, euthanasia tells people that life is not worth fighting for. There is no hopefulness or charity in the message of euthanasia. There is no encouragement or reminder that each individual is uniquely valuable. Instead, euthanasia sends the unethical and immoral message that assisted suicide is a legitimate solution to the problem of suffering.

Not only does Richardson’s book normalize assisted suicide, but it also promotes euthanasia as an act of compassion. By marketing it as such to young children, books such as Last Week normalize and desensitize a whole generation to ideas that were previously acknowledged as evil, allowing them to be widely accepted and embraced by society at large. Euphemisms such as “medical assistance in dying” replace previous terminology such as “assisted suicide” in an attempt to further soften the graphic reality of murder and make it appear comfortable, compassionate, and ethical.

In a world that continuously pushes various ideological agendas on young and easily influenced audiences through books, social media, and education itself, it is crucial that parents remain aware of the increasingly common threats made to their children’s innocence in order that they can guard their children against such indoctrination and know how to respond to it.

Reprinted with permission from Campaign Life Coalition.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

4 Comments

    Loading...